PREDICTION OF POST-HARVEST SOIL TEST VALUE AFTER SAFFLOWER (Carthamus tinctorius L.) CROP IN VERTISOL OF CHHATTISGARH, INDIA

Authors

  • G K Jatav Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidhyalaya (IGKV), Raipur - 492 012, Chhattisgarh (India)
  • L K Srivastava Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidhyalaya (IGKV), Raipur - 492 012, Chhattisgarh (India)
  • Rakesh Banwasi Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidhyalaya (IGKV), Raipur - 492 012, Chhattisgarh (India)
  • V K Singhal Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidhyalaya (IGKV), Raipur - 492 012, Chhattisgarh (India)
  • R K Bhagat Krishi Vigyan Kendra, IGKV, Jashpur - 496 220, Chhattisgarh (India)
  • Deepika Devdas Rani Awanti Bai Lodhi College of Agriculture and Research Station, IGKV, Chhuikhadan - 491885, Chhattisgarh (India)
  • Sakshi Bajaj R.S.V. College of Agriculture and Research Station, IGKV, Bemetara - 491 335, Chhattisgarh (India)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/abr.2026.28.01.38

Keywords:

Integrated nutrient management, post-harvest soil test value, safflower, soil test crop response

Abstract

Soil fertility management is cornerstone for sustainable crop production,  ensuringnutrient availability for optimal yields.Reliable estimates ofpost-harvest  soil test values (PHSTVs) are crucial for planning nutrient applications for  succeeding crops. Conventional soil testing after each crop cycle is costly and  time-consuming; hence, predictive models based on initial soil fertility status,  applied fertilizer doses, and crop yields provide a practical alternative. The  present study was aimed to assess the relationship between observed and  predicted PHSTVs and to generate prediction equations after safflower  cultivation. Multiple regression analysis was performed, considering PHSTVs as  the dependent variable and initial soil test levels, fertilizer inputs, and grain  yields as independent variables. Equations developed on the basis of yield and  nutrient uptake demonstrated high predictability for KMnO4-N, Olsen’s P, and  NH4+-acetate extractable K. Predicted PHSTVs for N, P, and K were compared  with observed values, yielding considerably large R² values, confirming strong  model performance. Calibration using RMSE and RE showed RMSE values in  the order K > N > P, while RE values followed P > K > N. For safflower, RE  values below 10% indicated excellent prediction accuracy. The generated  equations for PHSTVs offer a reliable tool for estimating soil test values without  repeated laboratory testing. This approach reduces soil testing costs, improves  nutrient management efficiency, and supports sustainable crop production. 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Abishek, R., Santhi, R., Maragatham, S., Venkatachalam, S. R., Uma, D., & Lakshmanan, A. (2022). Post-harvest soil nutrient prediction in hybrid castor (Ricinus communis L.) cropping sequence using a multivariate analysis technique. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 14(3), 946–953.

2. Andualem, A., Wato, T., Asfaw, A., & Urgi, G. (2024). Improving primary nutrients (NPK) use efficiency for the sustainable production and productivity of cereal crops: A comprehensive review. Journal of Agriculture Sustainability and Environment, 3(1), 1–28.

3. Anonymous. (2018). Agricultural statistics at a glance 2018. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation & Farmers Welfare, Government of India.

4. Arbad, B. K., & Ismail, S. (2011). Effect of integrated nutrient management on soybean (Glycine max)–safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) cropping system. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 56(4), 340–345.

5. Arya, A., Singh, S., & Dey, P. (2019). Prediction of post-harvest soil test values and apparent nutrient balance after cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis) in Mollisol. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 7(1), 1626–1629.

6. Bhadhauriya, P. S., Thomas, T., & Rao, P. S. (2019). Soil test crop response fertilizer recommendation for rabi maize (Zea mays L.) in eastern plain zone of Uttar Pradesh, India. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 7(3), 3301–3304.

7. Charishma, D. S., Kuligod, V. B., Gundlur, S. S., Doddamani, M. B., & Potdar, M. P. (2023). Comparative analysis of physical and chemical properties and available nutrient status in Vertisols, Ultisols, and Alfisols of northern Karnataka. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 12(10), 107–111.

8. Coumaravel, K., Santhi, R., & Maragatham, S. (2016). Prediction of post-harvest soil test values and fertiliser calibrations for maize under integrated plant nutrition system on Alfisol. International Journal of Advanced Research and Review, 1(6), 146–155.

9. Dobermann, A., Witt, C., Abdulrachman, S., Gines, H. S., Nagarajan, R., Son, T. T., et al. (2003). Soil fertility and indigenous nutrient supply in irrigated rice domains of Asia. Agronomy Journal, 95(4), 913–923.

10. Hanway, J. J., & Heidel, H. (1952). Soil analysis methods as used in Iowa State College Soil Testing Laboratory. Iowa State College of Agriculture Bulletin, 57, 1–531.

11. Jackson, M. L. (1973). Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India Private Limited.

12. Jamieson, P. D., Porter, J. R., & Wilson, D. R. (1991). A test of the computer simulation model ARC WHEAT1 on wheat crops grown in New Zealand. Field Crops Research, 27(4), 337–350.

13. Jatav, G. K., & Srivastava, L. K. (2023). Prediction of post-harvest soil test value after rice (Oryza sativa L.) crop in Vertisol of Chhattisgarh plain climatic zone. International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, 8(4), 474–477.

14. Kamboj, D., Choudhary, R., Diwakar, A. K., & Maurya, S. (2024). Integrated nutrient management for improving the soil sustainability and crop productivity: A review. Journal of Advances in Biology and Biotechnology, 27(11), 1053–1062.

15. Kirankumar, C., Santhi, R., Srihari, D., & Maragatham, S. (2019). Fertilizer calibrations for hybrid brinjal-based cropping sequence using post-harvest soil test values prediction equations under soil test crop response based integrated plant nutrition system. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 8(7), 2051–2061.

16. Kumar, S., Singh, S., Gautham, P., Gangola, P., & Kumar, V. (2018). Prediction of post-harvest soil test values and apparent nutrient balance for turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) in Mollisol of Uttarakhand. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(Special Issue), 4353–5358.

17. Luthra, N., Srivastava, A., Shahi, U. P., Singh, V. K., Dey, P., & Singh, A. (2023). Prediction of post-harvest soil nutrient status through multiple linear regression for targeted yield of hybrid maize. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 68(4), 447–450.

18. Mahajan, G. R., Pandey, R. N., Datta, S. C., Sahoo, R. N., Dinesh, Kumar, Murgaonkar, D., et al. (2019). Predicting post-harvest soil test values in hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L.)–wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cropping sequence using a multivariate analysis technique. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 50(13), 1624–1639.

19. Manikanta, C., Pasala, R., Kaliamoorthy, S., Basavaraj, P. S., Pandey, B. B., Vadlamudi, D. R., et al. (2023). Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) crop adaptation to residual moisture stress: Conserved water use and canopy temperature modulation are better adaptive mechanisms. PeerJ, 11, e15928. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15928

20. Meshram, N. A., Ismail, S., Pinjari, S. S., More, S. S., Wahane, M. R., & Jagtap, D. N. (2020). Impact of long-term fertilization on soil quality and fertility under soybean–safflower cropping sequence in Vertisol. Indian Journal of Soil Conservation, 48(1), 27–34.

21. Mondal, S., Gorai, D., Saha, N., Dasgupta, S., Bhattacharyya, K., & Dey, P. (2020). Integrated fertilizer prescriptions through targeted yield model and prediction of post-harvest soil test values for kharif rice (Oryza sativa). Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, 68(3), 330–336.

22. Murthy, R. K., Nagaraju, B., Govinda, K., Uday Kumar, S. N., Basavaraja, P. K., Saqeebulla, et al. (2024). Soil test crop response nutrient prescription equations for improving soil health and yield sustainability: A long-term study under Alfisols of southern India. Frontiers in Plant Science, 15, 1439523. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1439523

23. Olsen, S. R., Cole, C. V., Watanabe, F. S., & Dean, A. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circular, 939, 1–19.

24. Pandit, N. R., Adhikari, S., Vista, S. P., & Choudhary, D. (2025). Nitrogen management utilizing 4R nutrient stewardship: A sustainable strategy for enhancing NUE, reducing maize yield gap and increasing farm profitability. Nitrogen, 6(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/nitrogen6010007

25. Paramesh, V., Mohan Kumar, R., Rajanna, G. A., Gowda, S., Nath, A. J., Madival, Y., et al. (2023). Integrated nutrient management for improving crop yields, soil properties, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7, 1173258. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1173258

26. Ponakala, P., Garg, K. K., & Anantha, K. H. (2024). Water use and yield response of rainfed safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) in Vertisols with varying soil depths. Agronomy Journal, 116, 1933–1951.

27. Ramamoorthy, B., & Velayutham, M. (1971). Soil test-crop response correlation work in India: Report No. 41. World Soil Resources, FAO.

28. Ramamoorthy, B., Narasimhan, R. L., & Dinesh, R. S. (1967). Fertilizer application for specific yield targets of Sonera-64 wheat. Indian Farming, 17, 43–45.

29. Selvam, R., Santhi, R., Maragatham, S., Chandrasekhar, C. N., & Ganapathi, P. S. (2021). Extrapolation of post-harvest soil test values in barnyard millet-based cropping sequence through multivariate analysis. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 13(4), 1545–1551.

30. Shukla, A. K., Behera, S. K., Chaudhari, S. K., & Singh, G. (2022). Fertilizer use in Indian agriculture and its impact on human health and environment. Indian Journal of Fertilisers, 18(3), 218–237.

31. Singh, V. K., Gautama, P., & Sen, S. (2025). Soil test crop response-based fertilizer application improves soil fertility and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) productivity grown after direct-seeded rice in Mollisols of northern India. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 56(12), 1767–1789.

32. Singh, Y. V., Jatav, S. S., & Bharteey, P. K. (2020). Development of fertilizer prescription targeted yield equation for soya (Anethum graveolens L.) based on soil test values in an Inceptisol. Annals of Plant and Soil Research, 22(3), 249–253.

33. Spoorthishankar, K. S., Krishna Murthy, R., Kadalli, G. G., Vasanthi, B. G., Pushpa, K., & Muthuraju, R. (2025). Comparative study on nutrient recommendation approaches for optimizing greengram productivity in Alfisols. Mysore Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 59(1), 386–397.

34. Subbiah, B. V., & Asija, G. L. (1956). A rapid procedure for estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Current Science, 25, 259–260.

35. Suresh, R., & Santhi, R. (2019). Prediction of post-harvest soil test values and fertilizer calibrations for a maize-based cropping sequence under integrated plant nutrition system. Madras Agricultural Journal, 106(1–3), 63–68.

36. Zhu, Y., Li, Y., Feng, W., Tian, Y., Yao, X., & Cao, W. (2006). Monitoring leaf nitrogen in wheat using canopy reflectance spectra. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 86(4), 1037–1046.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-05

How to Cite

PREDICTION OF POST-HARVEST SOIL TEST VALUE AFTER SAFFLOWER (Carthamus tinctorius L.) CROP IN VERTISOL OF CHHATTISGARH, INDIA. (2026). Applied Biological Research, 28(3), 369-376. https://doi.org/10.48165/abr.2026.28.01.38