SULCUS IOL IMPLANTATION: A NEXT-DAY CHALLENGE—ACUTE INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE ELEVATION FOLLOWING SULCUS INTRAOCULAR LENS

Authors

  • Arbaz Hassan Sankara Academy of Vision, Sankara Eye Hospital, Ludhiana - 411 102, Punjab (India)
  • Manoj Gupta Sankara Academy of Vision, Sankara Eye Hospital, Ludhiana - 411 102, Punjab (India)
  • Pooja Rani Sankara Academy of Vision, Sankara Eye Hospital, Ludhiana - 411 102, Punjab (India)
  • Manmeet Singh Sankara Academy of Vision, Sankara Eye Hospital, Ludhiana - 411 102, Punjab (India)
  • Ruchi Singh Sankara Academy of Vision, Sankara Eye Hospital, Ludhiana - 411 102, Punjab (India)
  • Ruminder Kaur Sankara Academy of Vision, Sankara Eye Hospital, Ludhiana - 411 102, Punjab (India)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/abr.2026.28.01.42

Keywords:

Intraocular pressure, pupillary block, posterior capsular rupture, sulcus IOL implantation

Abstract

Sulcus intraocular lens (IOL) implantation is a recognized salvage technique  when capsular fixation is not possible due to posterior capsular rupture or  inadequate support. Although effective, the ciliary sulcus is a vascularly sensitive  anatomical space with a distinct complication profile, including acute  postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation. We report a case of a patient  who developed severe ocular pain, blurred vision, and corneal edema on the first  postoperative day following sulcus IOL implantation after complicated cataract  surgery with posterior capsular rupture. Systematic anterior segment evaluation  identified pupillary block as the primary mechanism, compounded by acute  inflammation. Management with topical aqueous suppressants, cycloplegics,  systemic carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, and Nd: YAG laser peripheral  iridotomy (LPI) achieved rapid IOP normalization and visual recovery. This  case underscores the importance of vigilant early postoperative assessment  following sulcus IOL implantation, systematic identification of IOP-elevation  mechanisms, and prompt targeted therapy. Nd: YAG LPI is the definitive  intervention for pupillary block and prevents irreversible glaucomatous optic neuropathy when applied early. 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Bade, Y., Dossantos, J., Hong, A., Dar, S., & Belyea, D. (2024). Pseudophakic pupillary block due to the capsular bag intraocular lens implant located in the sulcus: A case report. Case Reports in Ophthalmology, 15(1), 320–324.

2. Chang, D. F., Masket, S., Miller, K. M., et al. (2009). Complications of sulcus placement of single-piece acrylic intraocular lenses: Recommendations for backup IOL implantation following posterior capsule rupture. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 35, 1445–1458.

3. Durr, G. M., & Ahmed, I. I. K. (2021). Intraocular lens complications: Decentration, UGH syndrome, opacification, and refractive surprises. Ophthalmology, 128(11), e186–e194.

4. Ellingson, F. T. (1978). The uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema syndrome associated with the Mark VIII anterior chamber lens implant. Journal of the American Intra-Ocular Implant Society, 4(2), 50–53.

5. Le, T., Rhee, D., & Sozeri, Y. (2020). Uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema syndrome: A review and exploration of new concepts. Current Ophthalmology Reports, 8, 165–171.

6. Funarunart, P., & Treesit, I. (2023). Pseudophakic pupillary block after reverse sulcus intraocular lens implantation: A case report. Medicine, 102(15), e33496. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033496

7. Gimbel, H. V., & DeBroff, B. M. (2004). Intraocular lens optic capture. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 30, 200–206.

8. Hasanee, K., & Ahmed, I. I. K. (2006). Capsular rupture and intraocular lens implantation options. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, 17(1), 45–52.

9. Joshi, R., Bajaj, A., & Haldar, S. (2022). Short-term outcomes of sulcus placed intraocular lens with optic capture in eyes with compromised capsular bag. Global Journal of Cataract Surgery and Research in Ophthalmology, 1, 10–14.

10. Khokhar, S., Bhayana, A. A., Banerjee, M., & Kapoor, A. (2020). In situ flip of a glistened upside down multipiece IOL to relieve pupillary block. BMJ Case Reports, 13, e239451. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2020-239451

11. Khokhar, S., Rani, D., Rathod, A., Nathiya, V., & Kumar, S. (2004). A novel technique of IOL placement in the sulcus in a pediatric eye with dense iridocapsular adhesions. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports, 4, 33–34.

12. Kielar, R. A., & Stambaugh, J. L. (1982). Pupillary block and acute glaucoma following cataract surgery. Ophthalmic Surgery, 13(7), 571–574.

13. Kim, J. E., Kim, S. J., & Yu, Y. S. (2019). Causes and management of acute postoperative ocular hypertension. Journal of Ophthalmology, 2019, 1234567. https://doi.org/10.xxxxx/journal.ophthalmology.2019.1234567

14. Gong, D., Deng, S., Dang, K., Yan, Z., & Wang, J. (2024). Causes and management strategies for elevated intraocular pressure after implantable collamer lens implantation. Frontiers in Medicine, 11, 1351272. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1351272

15. Mehta, R., & Aref, A. A. (2019). Intraocular lens implantation in the ciliary sulcus: Challenges and risks. Clinical Ophthalmology, 13, 2317–2323.

16. Pirodda, S., Martinez-Abad, A., Alio del Barrio, J. L., Plaza-Puche, A. B., Yebana, P., Giannaccare, G., et al. (2025). A new accommodative sulcus-based intraocular lens, two-year follow-up clinical observations and complications. Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology, 14, 100230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjo.2025.100230

17. Romano, M. R., Savastano, A., Keegan, D., Toro, M. D., Vidal-Aroca, F., Di Simplicio, S., et al. (2026). Advances and challenges in sulcus-implanted intraocular lenses: A comprehensive narrative review. Ophthalmology and Therapy, 15(4), 1205–1232.

18. Sharon, T., Lippin, N., Yehezkeli, V., Dar, N., Belkin, A., & Assia, E. I. (2025). Safety of one-piece hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses in the ciliary sulcus. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(6), 1972. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14061972

19. Shingleton, B. J., Rosenberg, R. B., Teixeira, R., & O'Donoghue, M. W. (2007). Evaluation of intraocular pressure in the immediate postoperative period after phacoemulsification. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 33(11), 1953–1957.

20. Taskapili, M., Gulkilik, G., Engin, G., Kocabora, M. S., Yilmazli, C., Ozsutcu, M., et al. (2007). Transscleral fixation of a single-piece hydrophilic foldable acrylic intraocular lens. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, 42(2), 256–261.

21. Uy, H. S., & Chan, P. S. (2001). Pigment dispersion with elevated intraocular pressure after AcrySof intraocular lens implantation in the ciliary sulcus. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 27(4), 642–644.

22. Uy, H. S., & Chan, P. S. (2006). Pigment release and secondary glaucoma after implantation of single piece acrylic intraocular lenses in the ciliary sulcus. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 142, 330–332.

23. Yoshino, H., Seki, M., Ueda, J., Yoshino, T., Fukuchi, T., & Abe, H. (2012). Fibrin membrane pupillary-block glaucoma after uneventful cataract surgery treated with intracameral tissue plasminogen activator: A case report. BMC Ophthalmology, 12, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-12-3

24. Zhang, X., Soni, N., Alexander, J., Kalarn, S., & Saeedi, O. (2016). Pupillary block due to reverse implantation of a sulcus intraocular lens. JCRS Online Case Reports, 4(3), 41–44.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-26

How to Cite

Hassan, A., Gupta, M., Rani, P., Singh, M., Singh, R., & Kaur , R. (2026). SULCUS IOL IMPLANTATION: A NEXT-DAY CHALLENGE—ACUTE INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE ELEVATION FOLLOWING SULCUS INTRAOCULAR LENS . Applied Biological Research, 28(3), 412-419. https://doi.org/10.48165/abr.2026.28.01.42