Abstract
Twenty-eight indigenous and exotic mango (Mangifera indica L.) cultivars were characterized in West Bengal, India, for morphological, physical, physicochemical, sensory and ambient shelf-life traits. Fruits were obtained from a single orchard during one season, and the comparative analyses used cultivar-level summary values (n = 28). Fruit weight ranged from 87 to 535 g and pulp weight from 30 to 365 g; fruit weight and pulp weight were strongly related (r = 0.928; FDR-adjusted q < 0.001). Total soluble solids (TSS) ranged from 5.0 to 22.0 °Brix, titratable acidity from 0.15 to 0.45%, and firmness from 2.5 to 12.0 kg cm⁻². After Benjamini-Hochberg correction across 78 pairwise correlations, the previously noted associations of taste with TSS, aroma and firmness were not all statistically supported. Principal component analysis of 13 standardized traits showed that PC1 and PC2 explained 30.7% and 16.5% of the variance, respectively; five components had eigenvalues >1 and together explained 76.4%. A sensitivity analysis excluding Chitalkhas, which had an unusually low TSS value (5.0 °Brix), preserved the broad PCA structure but weakened the TSS-taste association. Osteen and Dofala had the longest recorded ambient shelf-life ranges (12–15 d), whereas Manjeera, Chiang Mai and BARI-4 were notable for high fruit or pulp weight. Shelf-life values were derived from previously recorded thesis ranges rather than replicate-level measurements with a uniform quantitative endpoint. Accordingly, the results are preliminary cultivar-level comparisons that require replicated, multi-season validation using standardized maturity and shelf-life criteria.
The full text of this article is available as a PDF.
Download PDF- 1. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute. (2006). Descriptors for mango (Mangifera indica L.). International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.
- 2. International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants. (2006). Mango (Mangifera indica L.): Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability (TG/112/4). UPOV.
- 3. Jha, S. K., Sethi, S., Srivastav, M., Dubey, A. K., Sharma, R. R., Samuel, D. V. K., & Singh, A. K. (2010a). Firmness characteristics of mango hybrids under ambient storage. Journal of Food Engineering, 97(2), 208–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.10.011
- 4. Jha, S. N., Narsaiah, K., Sharma, A. D., Singh, M., Bansal, S., & Kumar, R. (2010b). Quality parameters of mango and potential of non-destructive techniques for their measurement: A review. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 47(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-010-0004-6
- 5. Khadivi, A., Mirheidari, F., Saeidifar, A., & Moradi, Y. (2022). Identification of the promising mango (Mangifera indica L.) genotypes based on morphological and pomological characters. Food Science & Nutrition, 10(11), 3638–3650. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2961
- 6. Medlicott, A. P., Bhogal, M., & Reynolds, S. B. (1986). Changes in peel pigmentation during ripening of mango fruit (Mangifera indica var. Tommy Atkins). Annals of Applied Biology, 109(3), 651–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1986.tb03222.x
- 7. Rajan, S., & Yadav, A. (2021). Mango hybrids and improved cultivars. Indian Horticulture, 66(4), 3–8.
- 8. Ranganath, K. G., Shivashankara, K. S., Roy, T. K., Dinesh, M. R., Geetha, G. A., Pavithra, K. C., & Ravishankar, K. V. (2018). Profiling of anthocyanins and carotenoids in fruit peel of different coloured mango cultivars. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 55(11), 4566–4577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-018-3392-7
- 9. Royal Horticultural Society. (2015). RHS colour chart (6th ed.). Royal Horticultural Society.
- 10. Saheda, M. D., Bala Hussaini, M. G., & Balakrishna, M. (2019). Study of physico-chemical characters of mango varieties and hybrids under Kodur agro-climatic conditions. Indian Journal of Pure & Applied Biosciences, 7(4), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.7334
- 11. Saroj, N., & Prasad, K. (2023). Assessment of Himalayan plain mango genotypes for phytochemicals, biochemical-nutraceutical characterisation and quality change during storage life. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 58(7), 3781–3799. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.16480
- 12. Siddiq, M., Brecht, J. K., & Sidhu, J. S. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of mango fruit: Production, postharvest science, processing technology and nutrition. Wiley-Blackwell.
- 13. Singh, H., Chakraborty, I., Singh, B., Panja, P., & Hynniewta, L. L. (2014). Physico-chemical properties of three commercial varieties of mango (Mangifera indica L.) in West Bengal. In Book of abstracts: National seminar on integrated approaches in horticulture for sustainable development (p. 11). Palli Siksha Bhavana, Visva-Bharati.
- 14. Singh, Z., Singh, R. K., Sane, V. A., & Nath, P. (2013). Mango postharvest biology and biotechnology. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 32(4), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2012.743399
- 15. Yashoda, H. M., Prabha, T. N., & Tharanathan, R. N. (2006). Mango ripening: Changes in cell wall constituents in relation to textural softening. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 86(5), 713–721. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2404
Looking up citing articles…
Copyright © 2026 Advances in Applied Biological Research