Skip to content
Home▶ Journals▶ Journal of Eco-friendly Agriculture▶Archive▶Vol. 21 No. 2 (2026)▶Comparison of additives for enhancing shelf life of…
Journal of Eco-friendly Agriculture
Print ISSN 2229-628X · Online ISSN 2582-2683
Research Article

Comparison of additives for enhancing shelf life of Azospirillum brasilense NAIMCC B 00896 biofertilizer

,
S Garcha — Department of Microbiology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana- 141 001, Punjab, India
N Kaur — Department of Microbiology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana- 141 001, Punjab, India
Published 27 Jul 2026 Vol. 21 No. 2 (2026), pp. 316-322
Formats:PDF 🔒 Subscription
🔒 PDF

Abstract

Global food security faces challenges from population growth and climate change, demanding sustainable biofertilizers. This study optimized liquid Azospirillum brasilense NAIMCC B 00896 formulations with additives. Trehalose (15 mM) + PVP (5%) best preserved Azospirillum viability (8.90 log CFU ml⁻¹ at 56 weeks), compliant to FCO limits. Post-storage plant growth promoting traits remained robust: N-fixation (25 mg N/g), IAA (38.93 μg/ml), ACC deaminase (18.71 μmol mg⁻¹ h⁻¹), siderophore (42.36%), P-solubilization (SI 2.67). Field trials of PR 126 enhanced rice yield 9.86% (81 q/ha), height (106 cm), tillers (310 m⁻²) compared to untreated control. These results validate a scalable, eco-friendly solutions.

KeywordsAzospirillum brasilensechemical additivesliquid biofertilizersshelf lifecell viability
🔒 Full text available to subscribers
  • PDF — print-ready version
  1. Ahemad, M. and Kibret, M. 2014. Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: current perspective. J. King Saud Univ. Sci., 26: 1-20.
  2. Ahmad, T.; Rahim, A.A.; Bilal, R.M.H.; Noor, A.; Maab, H.; Naveed, M.A. and Saeed, M.A. 2022. Ultrawideband cross-polarization converter using anisotropic reflective metasurface. Electronics, 11: 487.
  3. Alam, J.; Rahman, W.; Mazid, R.A. and Khan, M.R. 2015. Gamma-irradiated gelatin-based films modified by HEMA for medical application. Int. J. Polym. Anal. Charact., 20: 426-434.
  4. Bano, S.; Wu, X. and Zhang, X. 2021. Towards sustainable agriculture: rhizosphere microbiome engineering. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 105: 7141-7160.
  5. Bardi, L. and Malusà, E. 2012. Drought and nutritional stresses in plant: alleviating role of rhizospheric microorganisms. In Abiotic Stress: New Research, Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp. 1-57.
  6. Basu, A.; Prasad, P.; Das, S.N.; Kalam, S.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Reddy, M.S. and El Enshasy, H. 2021. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) as green bioinoculants: recent developments, constraints and prospects. Sustainability, 13: 1140.
  7. Bhardwaj, D.; Ansari, M.W.; Sahoo, R.K. and Tuteja, N. 2014. Biofertilizers function as key player in sustainable agriculture by improving soil fertility, plant tolerance and crop productivity. Microb. Cell Fact., 13: 66.
  8. El Sabagh, A.; Islam, M.S.; Hossain, A.; Iqbal, M.A.; Mubeen, M.; Waleed, M. and Abdelhamid, M.T. 2022. Phytohormones as growth regulators during abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Front. Agron., 4: 765068.
  9. El-Ramady, H.; Abdalla, N.; Alshaal, T.; El-Henawy, A.; Elmahrouk, M.; Bayoumi, Y. and Schnug, E. 2018. Plant nano-nutrition: perspectives and challenges. In Nanotechnology, Food Security and Water Treatment, Elsevier, pp. 129-161.
  10. Esbelin, J.; Santos, T. and Hébraud, M. 2018. Desiccation: an environmental and food industry stress that bacteria commonly face. Food Microbiol., 69: 82-88.
  11. Gordon, S.A. and Weber, R.P. 1951. Colorimetric estimation of indoleacetic acid. Plant Physiology, 26: 192-195.
  12. Gu, Y.; Qin, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, C. and Guo, S. 2021. Global justice index report 2020. Chin. Polit. Sci. Rev., 6: 322-486.
  13. Honma, M.; Shimomura, T. 1978. Metabolism of 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, 42: 1825-1831.
  14. Hu, H.W.; Chen, Q.L. and He, J.Z. 2022. The end of hunger: fertilizers, microbes and plant productivity. Microb. Biotechnol., 15: 1050-1054.
  15. Jaiswal, A.; Kumari, G.; Upadhyay, V.K.; Pradhan, J. and Pramanik, H.S.K. 2023. A methodology to develop liquid formulation of biofertilizer technology. Pharma Innov. J., 12: 875-881.
  16. Kuczyńska-Wiśnik, D.; Stojowska-Swędrzyńska, K. and Laskowska, E. 2024. Intracellular protective functions and therapeutical potential of trehalose. Molecules, 29: 2088.
  17. Li, Z.; Li, J.; Liu, G.; Li, Y.; Wu, X.; Liang, J. and Peng, F. 2025. Isolation, characterization and growth-promoting properties of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria derived from peach tree rhizosphere. Microorganisms, 13: 718.
  18. Mahanty, T.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Goswami, M.; Bhattacharyya, P.; Das, B.; Ghosh, A. and Tribedi, P. 2017. Biofertilizers: a potential approach for sustainable agriculture development. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 24: 3315-3335.
  19. Malusà, E. and Vassilev, N. 2014. A contribution to set a legal framework for biofertilisers. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 98: 6599-6607.
  20. Méndez-Zambrano, P.V.; Tierra Pérez, L.P.; Ureta Valdez, R.E. and Flores Orozco, Á.P. 2023. Technological innovations for agricultural production from an environmental perspective: a review. Sustainability, 15: 16100.
  21. Mishra, A.; Rajput, S.; Gupta, P.S.; Goyal, V.; Singh, S.; Sharma, S. and Varma, A. 2021. Role of cyanobacteria in rhizospheric nitrogen fixation. In Soil Nitrogen Ecology, Springer, Cham, pp. 497-519.
  22. Mohanty, P.; Singh, P.K.; Chakraborty, D.; Mishra, S. and Pattnaik, R. 2021. Insight into the role of PGPR in sustainable agriculture and environment. Front. Sustain. Food Syst., 5: 667150.
  23. Nagarajan, R.; Krishnamoorthy, Y.; Basavarachar, V. and Dakshinamoorthy, R. 2022. Prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder among survivors of severe COVID-19 infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Affect. Disord., 299: 52-59.
  24. Olaniyan, F.T.; Alori, E.T.; Adekiya, A.O.; Ayorinde, B.B.; Daramola, F.Y.; Osemwegie, O.O. and Babalola, O.O. 2022. The use of soil microbial potassium solubilizers in potassium nutrient availability in soil and its dynamics. Ann. Microbiol., 72: 45.
  25. Ortiz-Bobea, A.; Ault, T.R.; Carrillo, C.M.; Chambers, R.G. and Lobell, D.B. 2021. Anthropogenic climate change has slowed global agricultural productivity growth. Nat. Clim. Change, 11: 306-312.
  26. Pahalvi, H.N.; Rafiya, L.; Rashid, S.; Nisar, B. and Kamili, A.N. 2021. Chemical fertilizers and their impact on soil health. In Microbiota and Biofertilizers, Vol. 2: Ecofriendly Tools for Reclamation of Degraded Soil Environs, Springer, Cham, pp. 1-20.
  27. Rawat, P.; Das, S.; Shankhdhar, D. and Shankhdhar, S.C. 2021. Phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms: mechanism and their role in phosphate solubilization and uptake. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 21: 49-68.
  28. Rónavári, A.; Bélteky, P.; Boka, E.; Zakupszky, D.; Igaz, N.; Szerencsés, B. and Kiricsi, M. 2021. Polyvinyl-pyrrolidone-coated silver nanoparticles: colloidal, chemical and biological consequences of steric stabilization under biorelevant conditions. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 22: 8673.
  29. Santhosh, G.P. 2015. Formulation and shelf life of liquid biofertilizer inoculants using cell protectants. Int. J. Res. Biosci. Agric. Technol., II: 7.
  30. Tian, Z.; Zhao, H.; Peter, K.T.; Gonzalez, M.; Wetzel, J.; Wu, C. and Kolodziej, E.P. 2021. A ubiquitous tire rubber–derived chemical induces acute mortality in coho salmon. Science, 371: 185-189.
  31. Usharani, K.V.; Roopashree, K.M. and Naik, D. 2019. Role of soil physical, chemical and biological properties for soil health improvement and sustainable agriculture. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem., 8: 1256-1267.
  32. Verma, K.K.; Joshi, A.; Song, X.P.; Singh, S.; Kumari, A.; Arora, J. and Li, Y.R. 2024. Synergistic interactions of nanoparticles and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria enhancing soil–plant systems: a multigenerational perspective. Front. Plant Sci., 15: 1376214.
  33. Verma, T.; Wei, X.; Lau, S.K.; Bianchini, A.; Eskridge, K.M. and Subbiah, J. 2018. Evaluation of Enterococcus faecium NRRL B-2354 as a surrogate for Salmonella during extrusion of low-moisture food. J. Food Sci., 83: 1063-1072.
  34. Xiang, T.; Malik, T.H.; Hou, J.W. and Ma, J. 2022. The impact of climate change on agricultural total factor productivity: a cross-country panel data analysis, 1961–2013. Agriculture, 12: 2123.
  35. Xing, Y.; Jiang, W.; He, X.; Fiaz, S.; Ahmad, S.; Lei, X. and Wang, X. 2019. A review of nitrogen translocation and nitrogen-use efficiency. J. Plant Nutr., 42: 2624-2641.
  36. Zhang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Zhao, D.; Tang, Z.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, K. and Zhang, H. 2023. Genetic regulation of lateral root development. Plant Signal. Behav., 18: 2081397.
  37. Zuñiga, R.A.A.; Lima, G.N. and Villoria, A.M.G. 2021. Impact of slow-onset events related to climate change on food security in Latin America and the Caribbean. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 50: 215-224.

Looking up citing articles…

    Copyright © 2026 Dr Seema Garcha, Navkiran Kaur