Histomorphological Organization of the Thoracic Oesophagus  in Siruvidai Chicken

Authors

  • Dharani Karnarayar Department of Veterinary Anatomy, Madras Veterinary College, Vepery, Chennai-600007, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India
  • Sathyamoorthy Ommini Ramamurthy Department of Veterinary Anatomy, Madras Veterinary College, Vepery, Chennai-600007, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India
  • Kannan Thandavan Arthanari Dean, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Orathanadu-614625, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India
  • Nagarajan Kumaresan Department of Veterinary Pathology, Madras Veterinary College, Vepery, Chennai-600007, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/ijvsbt.22.5.20

Keywords:

Histochemistry, Histology, Mucous glands, Siruvidai chicken, Thoracic oesophagus

Abstract

The present work represents the structural characteristics of the thoracic part of oesophagus in Siruvidai chicken (n=24). Tissue samples of  the thoracic oesophagus were collected from four different age groups (2, 6, 12 & 18 weeks old, 6 each) and these samples were subjected  to routine histological and histochemical staining to identify cellular architecture and secretory activity. The thoracic oesophageal wall  was made up of four tunics. The tunica mucosa had three layers and was thrown into folds. Stratified squamous epithelium forms the  lamina epithelial layer. Beneath this, the mucosa was supported by a welldefined lamina propria and lamina muscularis. Oesophageal  mucous glands were present in the lamina proprial layer. The tunica submucosa was primarily composed of loose connective tissue.  An inner thick circular and an outer thin longitudinal layer made the tunica muscularis layer. The outermost layer was tunica serosa.  The presence of acid and neutral mucins were observed in the oesophageal glands and the proteins were observed in the lamina  muscularis and tunica muscularis layers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, H. M., Ali, K. A., & Taha, A. M. (2023). Comparative anatomical, histological, and electron microscopical studies on the cervical region of the esophagus in some birds with different diet habits. Journal of Advanced Veterinary Research, 13(2), 181–187.

Aydin, N., Akbalik, M. E., Topaloglu, U., & Bayram, B. (2022). Histological structure of esophagus and histochemical profile of mucins in glands in partridge (Alectoris chukar). Erciyes University Veterinary Faculty Journal, 19(3), 175–181.

Bancroft, J. D., & Stevens, A. (1996). Theory and practice of histological techniques (4th ed.). Churchill Livingstone.

Banks, W. J. (1981). Applied veterinary histology (1st ed.). Williams & Wilkins.

Churchil, R. R., Vasanthi, B., & Silambarasan, P. (2023). Siruvidai chicken: A lesser known indigenous ecotype of Tamil Nadu. In Proceedings of the 38th Indian Poultry Science Association Conference (IPSACON), Srinagar, India.

Crole, M. R. (2009). A gross anatomical and histological study of the oropharynx and proximal oesophagus of the emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) [Master’s thesis, University of Pretoria]. University of Pretoria Repository

Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying. (2025). Annual report 2024–2025. Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry & Dairying, Government of India.

Getty, R. (1975). Sisson and Grossman’s the anatomy of the domestic animals (5th ed.). W. B. Saunders.

Hodges, R. D. (1974). The histology of the fowl. Academic Press.

Kadhim, K. H., & Mohamed, A. A. (2015). Comparative anatomical and histological study of the esophagus of local adult male and female homing pigeon (Columba livia domestica). Al-Qadisiya Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 14(1), 80–87.

Kausar, R., Qureshi, A. S., Ali, M. Z., Ateeq, M. K., & Usman, M. (2016). Age induced changes in the microscopic anatomy of the digestive system of Japanese quails (Coturnix japonica). Bioscience Research, 13(1), 26–31.

Luna, L. G. (1968). Manual of histologic staining methods of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill Book Co.

Mobini, B. (2014). The effect of age, sex and region on histological structures of the esophagus in broiler chickens. Veterinarija ir Zootechnika, 66(88), 46–49.

Naser, R. A. A., Al-Redah, S. A. A., Ahmed, E. S., Zghair, F. S., & Al-Ezzy, A. I. A. (2024). Comparative anatomy, histology, histochemistry, and immunohistochemistry of the esophagus in ostrich (Struthio camelus) and turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). Advances in Animal & Veterinary Sciences, 12(7), 1341–1347.

Nasrin, M., Siddiqi, M. N. H., Masum, M. A., & Wares, M. A. (2012). Gross and histological studies of digestive tract of broilers during postnatal growth and development. Journal of Bangladesh Agricultural University, 10(1), 69–77.

Pearse, A. G. E. (1960). Histochemistry: Theoretical and applied (2nd ed.). J. & A. Churchill Ltd.

Sagsoz, H., & Liman, N. (2009). Structure of the oesophagus and morphometric, histochemical–immunohistochemical profiles of the oesophageal gland during the post-hatching period of Japanese quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Anatomy, Histology & Embryology, 38(5), 330–340.

Singh, U. B., & Sulochana, S. (1996). Handbook of histological and histochemical techniques (1st ed.). Premier Publishing House.

Vasanthi, B., Churchil, R. R., Omprakash, A. V., Karthickeyan, S. M. K., & Ronald, B. S. M. (2022). A comparative evaluation of fertility, hatchability and embryonic mortality of indigenous Siruvidai chicken ecotype with Indian chicken breeds. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 11(12), 3611–3613.

Verma, D., Malik, M. R., Parmar, M. L., & Taluja, J. S. (2000). Morphohistogenesis of oesophagus in fowl (Gallus domesticus). Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 70(2), 121–125.

Published

2026-09-02

How to Cite

Karnarayar, D., Ommini Ramamurthy, S., Arthanari, K. T., & Kumaresan, N. (2026). Histomorphological Organization of the Thoracic Oesophagus  in Siruvidai Chicken. Indian Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Biotechnology, 22(5), 104-109. https://doi.org/10.48165/ijvsbt.22.5.20