Skip to content
Home▶ Journals▶ Indian Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Biotechnology▶Archive▶Vol. 22 No. 3 (2026)▶Sperm DNA Extraction in Livestock: Structural Challenges,…
Indian Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Biotechnology
Indian Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Biotechnology ›
Print ISSN 2394-0247 · Online ISSN 2395-1176
Submit your paper About the journal
Review Article

Sperm DNA Extraction in Livestock: Structural Challenges, Methodological Advances, and Applications in Assisted Reproductive Technologies

, , ,
Richa Khirbat — Institute of Para Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (LUVAS), Hisar-125001, India
Dinesh — Department of Animal Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (LUVAS), Hisar-125001, India
Minakshi Virmani — Department of Veterinary Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (LUVAS), Hisar-125001, India
Aman Kumar — Senior Scientist, Department of Animal Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (LUVAS), Hisar-125001, India.
Published 15 Apr 2026 Vol. 22 No. 3 (2026), pp. 1-8 ● Open access
❝ How to cite 🔗 https://doi.org/10.48165/ijvsbt.22.3.01
Download PDF

Abstract

Assisted reproductive technologies (ART), including artificial insemination, in-vitro fertilization, intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection, and embryo transfer, are central to genetic improvement and reproductive management in livestock. Beyond conventional semen parameters, sperm DNA integrity has emerged as a critical determinant of fertilization success, embryo development, pregnancy establishment, and offspring viability. However, the extraction of high-quality DNA from spermatozoa remains technically demanding due to the highly compact chromatin structure formed by protamine-rich DNA packaging and extensive disulfide cross-linking, which renders sperm nuclei resistant to standard lysis procedures. This review synthesizes current knowledge on sperm DNA extraction methodologies across livestock species, with emphasis on the structural and biochemical challenges unique to spermatozoa. Conventional extraction approaches, including organic solvent- and salt-based methods, are evaluated alongside modern and modified techniques incorporating strong reducing agents, optimized enzymatic digestion, chaotropic lysis buffers, and solid-phase purification systems. Recent advances, such as TCEP-based reduction, magnetic bead- and silica column–based platforms, and automated high-throughput workflows, have improved DNA yield, purity, integrity, and reproducibility, making them increasingly suitable for downstream molecular applications. Species-specific differences in chromatin organization among bovine, buffalo, ovine, caprine, porcine, and equine spermatozoa are highlighted, underscoring the need for tailored extraction protocols. The review also emphasizes the importance of rigorous DNA quality assessment for applications in genomic selection, epigenetic profiling, fertility prediction, and ART outcome optimization. Finally, key research gaps are identified, including the need for protocol harmonization, inter-laboratory validation, and integration with high-throughput omics and data-driven analytical approaches to support sustainable livestock breeding.
KeywordsAssisted reproductive technologies, DNA integrity, Genomic selection, Sperm chromatin structure, Sperm DNA extraction

The full text of this article is available as a PDF.

Download PDF
  1. Abah, K. O., Ligocka-Kowalczyk, Z., Itodo, J. I., Ameh, G., Partyka, A., & Nizanski, W. (2025). Association between sperm DNA fragmentation and fertility parameters in farm animals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Veterinary Research, 21(1), 204.
  2. Aitken, R. J., & De Iuliis, G. N. (2007). Origins and consequences of DNA damage in male germ cells. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 14(6), 727–733.
  3. Aitken, R. J., & De Iuliis, G. N. (2009). Origins of DNA damage in human spermatozoa. Molecular Human Reproduction, 16(1), 3–13.
  4. Amidi, F., Pazhohan, A., Shabani Nashtaei, M., Khodarahmian, M., & Nekoonam, S. (2020). The role of antioxidants in sperm freezing: A review. Cell and Tissue Banking, 21, 1–11.
  5. Arakawa, T., Niikura, T., Kita, Y., & Akuta, T. (2024). Sodium dodecyl sulfate analogs as a potential molecular biology reagent. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 46(1), 621–633.
  6. Arévalo, L., Merges, G. E., Schneider, S., & Schorle, H. (2022). Protamines: Lessons learned from mouse models. Reproduction, 164(3), R57–R74.
  7. Barbier, F. F., Chabikwa, T. G., Ahsan, M. U., Cook, S. E., Powell, R., Tanurdzic, M., & Beveridge, C. A. (2019). A phenol/chloroform-free method to extract nucleic acids from recalcitrant woody tropical species for gene expression and sequencing. Plant Methods, 15, 62.
  8. Barratt, C. L. R., Aitken, R. J., Björndahl, L., et al. (2010). Sperm DNA: Organization, protection and vulnerability. Human Reproduction Update, 16, 259–277.
  9. Björndahl, L., & Kvist, U. (2014). Structure of chromatin in spermatozoa. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 791, 1–11.
  10. Blackburn, H. D. (2012). Genetic selection and conservation of diversity. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 47, 249–254.
  11. Bouhadana, D., Godin Pagé, M. H., Montjean, D., Bélanger, M. C., Benkhalifa, M., Miron, P., & Petrella, F. (2025). The role of antioxidants in male fertility: A comprehensive review of mechanisms and clinical applications. Antioxidants, 14(8), 1013.
  12. Cai, Z., Guldbrandtsen, B., Lund, M. S., & Sahana, G. (2019). Prioritizing candidate genes for fertility in dairy cows. BMC Genomics, 20(1), 255.
  13. Champroux, A., Torres-Carreira, J., Gharagozloo, P., Drevet, J. R., & Kocer, A. (2016). Mammalian sperm nuclear organization: Resiliencies and vulnerabilities. Basic and Clinical Andrology, 26(1), 17.
  14. Chandaka, D., Regula, V., Krovvidi, S., Dhulipalla, N., & Kamisetty, A. K. (2024). Comparative assessment of five DNA extraction protocols from frozen buffalo semen. Exploratory Animal and Medical Research, 14(2).
  15. Crowe, M. A., Hostens, M., & Opsomer, G. (2018). Reproductive management in dairy cows—The future. Irish Veterinary Journal, 71, 1.
  16. Denis, E., Grohs, C., Donnadieu, C., & Iampietro, C. (2024). Validated DNA isolation method for cattle semen genome sequencing. PLoS One, 19(8), e0308011.
  17. Diskin, M. G., & Kenny, D. A. (2016). Optimising reproductive performance of beef cows and replacement heifers. Animal, 10, 1–15.
  18. Farani, P. S., Lopez, J., Faier-Pereira, A., Hasslocher-Moreno, A. M., Almeida, I. C., & Moreira, O. C. (2025). Magnetic bead-based DNA extraction in diagnostics. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(3), 937.
  19. Fatehi, A. N., Bevers, M. M., Schoevers, E., Roelen, B. A. J., Colenbrander, B., & Gadella, B. M. (2006). DNA damage in bovine sperm. Journal of Andrology, 27(2), 176–188.
  20. Fjelstrup, S., Andersen, M. B., Thomsen, J., Wang, J., Stougaard, M., Pedersen, F. S., et al. (2017). The effects of dithiothreitol on DNA. Sensors, 17(6), 1201.

Looking up citing articles…

    Creative Commons License

    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

    Copyright © 2026 Indian Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Biotechnology