Skip to content
Home▶ Journals▶ Indian Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Biotechnology▶Archive▶Vol. 5 No. 4 (2010)▶COLONIZATION WITH ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANT ORGANISMS IN THE…
Indian Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Biotechnology
Articles

COLONIZATION WITH ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANT ORGANISMS IN THE NASAL TRACT AND CLOACA OF DUCKS

, , ,
D Chhabra — Department Of Veterinary Microbiology College of Veterinary Science and A.H. Mhow- 453446 (M.p.), India
U Majeed — Department Of Veterinary Microbiology College of Veterinary Science and A.H. Mhow- 453446 (M.p.), India
K Kunal — Department Of Veterinary Microbiology College of Veterinary Science and A.H. Mhow- 453446 (M.p.), India
C Singh — Department Of Veterinary Microbiology College of Veterinary Science and A.H. Mhow- 453446 (M.p.), India
Published 10 Oct 2010 Vol. 5 No. 4 (2010), pp. 7-8 ● Open access
Download PDF

Abstract

Ten antibacterial agents belonging to 9 different groups of antibiotics viz. aminoglycosides, cephalosporins, chloramphenicol, fluroquinolones, nitrofurantoin, penicillin, pol mixin tetracyclines and sulphonamides were used for in vitro sensitivity testing. The results indicated that the organisms of nasal passage were 100% resistant to six antibiotic drugs. The organisms showed intermediate sensitivity to four drugs .Similarly, the organisms from cloaca were 100% resistant to Oxytetracycline, Cefuroxime, Ampicillin-cloxacillin, Colistin, Nitrofurantoin and Cotrimoxazole, sensitive to Ciprofloxacin and Ceftriaxone, and intermediate sensitive to Chloramphenicol and Gentamicin. Colonization specifically by antibiotic-resistant organisms followed a similar pattern in both the tracts. The results of nasal swab and cloaca indicate the exact pattern of resistance and very close pattern in sensitivity. Thus, the organisms showed complete resistance towards tetracycline, penicillin, polymixin sulphonamide and nitrofurantoin groups of antibiotics. The results of this study have demonstrated that indiscriminate use of the antibiotics is frequently associated with emergence of resistance in bacteria of ducks. 

KeywordsCOLONIZATIONDUCKSNASAL TRACT

The full text of this article is available as a PDF.

Download PDF
  1. Bauer, AW., W.M.M. Kirby, J.S. Sherris and M. Turck (1966). Am . .J. Clin. Pathol., 45: 493-496. Chandrakanthi, W.H.S., A Pathiratne and G.S. Widanapathirana (2000). Microbiol. Infect. Ois., 28: 9-42. Chang CF, Un WH, Yeh TM, Chiang TS, Chang YF. (2003). J Vet. Diagn. Invest., 15:26-29.
  2. Kaskhedikar, S. (2008). Studies on Bacteriological Quality of Buffalo Meat and Po;k with Special Reference to Escherichia coli and Salmonella. M. V. Sc. Thesis, submitted to Jawaharial Nehru Krishi Vishwa V'idyaiaya lay jablapur, India.
  3. Motyl, M.R., G. Mckinley and J.M. Janda (1985).. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 28: 151-153. Nawaz, M., K. Sung, S.A Khan, AA. Khan and R. Steele (2006). Appl. Environ. Microbial., 72: 6461-6462. Nonga, H. E. and Muhairwa, A. P. (2009).. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 1: 17.
  4. Soliman, Z.1. (1999). Vet. Med. J. Giza, 47: 19-27.
  5. Toltzis P. (2003).Minerva Pediatr., 55:385-93.
  6. Tsai, H.J. and Hsiang, P. H. (2005). J. Vet. Med. Sci., 67:7-12
  7. Vivekanandhan .A., G.K. Savithamani, AAM. Hatha and P. Lakshmanaperumalsamy (2002). Int. J. Food Microbiol., 76: 165-·168.
  8. Wasfy MO, Oyofo BA, David JC, Ismail TF, el-Gendy AM, Mahran ZS, Sultan Y, Peruski LF Jr. (2000). J. Health Popul. Nutr., 18:33-38.

Looking up citing articles…

    Creative Commons License

    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

    Copyright © 2024 Indian Journal of Veterinary Sciences & Biotechnology