Skip to content
Home▶ Journals▶ International Journal of Rehabilitation and Special Education (IJRSE) ▶Archive▶Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025)▶Universal Design for Learning in Action: Exploring…
International Journal of Rehabilitation and Special Education (IJRSE)
Research Article

Universal Design for Learning in Action: Exploring Strategies, Outcomes,  and Challenges in Inclusive Education

Bryan V Catama — School of Teacher Education and Liberal Arts, Saint Louis University, Baguio City 2600, Philippines
Published 10 May 2025 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025), pp. 6-12
Download PDF

Abstract

Despite strong global advocacy for inclusive education, a gap persists between policy  and classroom practice. Universal Design for Learning (UDL) offers a proactive  framework to address learner diversity, but its implementation remains uneven.  This narrative review examined UDL applications in inclusive education from  2014 to 2024, focusing on instructional strategies, academic and social outcomes,  and implementation challenges. A structured search of Consensus and Researcher. Life databases identified empirical studies published in English during the review  period. Studies were included if they presented original data on UDL strategies,  outcomes, or barriers within formal school or university settings. Eight studies met  the inclusion criteria. Findings show that UDL-based instruction frequently applies  multiple modes of engagement, representation, and expression. Digital platforms  often support access and personalization. Reported outcomes include improved  motivation, academic engagement, and social inclusion, although impact varies  based on implementation quality and institutional support. Key challenges involve  limited training, inadequate resources, and inconsistent understanding of UDL  principles. This review affirms UDL’s potential as an equity-driven framework  for inclusive education. However, its success depends on sustained investment  in professional development, strong leadership, and policy alignment to enable  systemic adoption. 

KeywordsUniversal Design for Learning (UDL)inclusive educationinstructional designaccessibility in educationdifferentiated instructioneducational equityteacher professional developmentinclusive pedagogy

The full text of this article is available as a PDF.

Download PDF
  1. Almeqdad, Q. I., Alodat, A. M., Alquraan, M. F., Mohaidat, M. A., & Al-Makhzoomy, A. K. (2023). The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.10
  2. 80/2331186x.2023.2218191
  3. Black, R. D., Weinberg, L. A., & Brodwin, M. G. (2015). Universal design for learning and instruction: Perspectives of students with disabilities in higher education. Exceptionality Education International, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v25i2.7723
  4. CAST. (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2. UDL: The UDL Guidelines. https://udlguidelines.cast.org Chawla, N. (2021). Universal design for learning: Implications for
  5. RTLB. Kairaranga, 22(1), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.54322/ kairaranga.v22i1.358
  6. Espada-Chavarria, R. M., Gallego Condoy, M. B., & Gonzalez Montesino, R. H. (2019). Diseño universal del aprendizaje e inclusión en la educación básica en Ecuador. Alteridad, 14(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.17163/alt.v14n2.2019.05
  7. Espada-Chavarria, R., González-Montesino, R. H., López Bastías, J. L., & Díaz-Vega, M. (2023). Universal design for learning and instruction: Effective strategies for inclusive higher education. Education Sciences, 13(6), 620. https://doi. org/10.3390/educsci13060620 Ewe, L., & Galvin, T. (2023). Universal design for learning across formal school structures in Europe—A systematic review. Education Sciences, 13(9), 867. https://doi.org/10.3390/ educsci13090867
  8. Fovet, F. (2020). Universal design for learning as a tool for inclusion in the higher education classroom: Tips for the next decade of implementation. Education Journal, 9(6), 163. https://doi. org/10.11648/j.edu.20200906.13
  9. Griful-Freixenet, J., Struyven, K., Verstichele, M., & Andries, C. (2017). Higher education students with disabilities speaking out: Perceived barriers and opportunities of the universal design for learning framework. Disability & Society, 32(10), 1627–1649. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1365695
  10. Guailla, Y. (2024). Implementación del diseño universal para el aprendizaje (DUA) en la educación superior: Retos y oportunidades. https://doi.org/10.62059/latarxiv. preprints.254
  11. Hollingshead, A., Lowrey, K. A., & Howery, K. (2020). Universal design for learning: When policy changes before evidence. Educational Policy, 36(5), 1135–1161. https://doi. org/10.1177/0895904820951120
  12. Ismailov, M., & Chiu, T. K. (2022). Catering to inclusion and diversity with universal design for learning in asynchronous online education: A self-determination theory perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/
  13. fpsyg.2022.819884
  14. Karisa, A. (2022). Universal design for learning: Not another slogan on the street of inclusive education. Disability & Society, 38(1), 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2022.2125792
  15. Katz, J. (2014). Implementing the three block model of universal design for learning: Effects on teachers’ self-efficacy, stress, and job satisfaction in inclusive classrooms K–12. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.
  16. 1080/13603116.2014.881569
  17. Kirsch, B., & Luo, T. (2023). Universal design for learning implementation in higher education: Survey of faculty and
  18. instructional designers. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design. https://doi.org/10.59668/806.13414
  19. McKenzie, J. A., & Dalton, E. M. (2020). Universal design for learning in inclusive education policy in South Africa. African Journal of Disability, 9. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v9i0.776
  20. Roski, M., Sebastian, R., Ewerth, R., Hoppe, A., & Nehring, A. (2024). Learning analytics and the universal design for learning (UDL): A clustering approach. Computers & Education, 214, 105028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105028
  21. Rossi, M. (2022). Universal design for learning and inclusive teaching: Future perspectives. Elementa. Intersections Between Philosophy, Epistemology and Empirical Perspectives, 1(1–2). https://doi.org/10.7358/elem-2021-0102-ross
  22. Rusconi, L., & Squillaci, M. (2023). Effects of a universal design for learning (UDL) training course on the development teachers’ competences: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 13(5), 466. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050466
  23. Scott, L. A. (2018). Barriers with implementing a universal design for learning framework. Inclusion, 6(4), 274–286. https://doi. org/10.1352/2326-6988-6.4.274
  24. Sewell, A., Kennett, A., & Pugh, V. (2022). Universal design for learning as a theory of inclusive practice for use by educational psychologists. Educational Psychology in Practice, 38(4), 364– 378. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2022.2111677
  25. Sharma, A., Thakur, K., Kapoor, D. S., & Singh, K. J. (2023). Designing inclusive learning environments. In Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design (pp. 24–61). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8208-7.ch002
  26. Sujathamalini, J., Gunasekaran, K., & T. R., V. (2022). Universal design for learning in inclusive classroom to ensure sustainable development goals: Inclusive and equitable quality classroom. International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research, 7(2), 239–243. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijshr.20220434
  27. Wilson, J. D. (2017). Reimagining disability and inclusive education through universal design for learning. Disability Studies Quarterly, 37(2). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v37i2.5417

Looking up citing articles…

    Creative Commons License

    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

    Copyright © 2025 International Journal of Rehabilitation and Special Education (IJRSE)