Abstract
An experimental study was conducted during 2019-20 at the Research Farm of AICRP on Agroforestry, Dr. BSKKV, Dapoli, Maharashtra. The results indicated that, significantly high soil fertility of Asana based agroforestry was recorded by T6>T5>T7 than other. The soil fertility status was noted slightly improvement in pH (5.94 to 5.97) and EC (0.232 to 0.254 dSm-1) by T6 during the years of 2019 and 2020. The maximum organic carbon (2.18 to 2.27 %), N (343.66 kg ha-1), and (351.33 kg ha-1), available P2O5 (22.30 to
25.20 kg ha-1) and available K2O (439.08 to 455.84 kg ha-1) was recorded in T6 in the year of 2019 and 2020, respectively. Overall, it can be concluded that the improving soil fertility were recorded significantly by T6>T5>T7 than other, it may be due to presence of high amount biomass contribution and addition organic matter in the soil. Thus, T6 –Asana + Jam is the best treatment under asana based agroforestry systems seem to be increased the soil fertility in lateritic soils of Konkan.
The full text of this article is available as a PDF.
Download PDF- 1. Alfaia, S. S., Ribeiro, G. A., Nobre, A. D., Luizão, R. C., & Luizão, F. J. (2003). Evaluation of soil fertility in smallholder agroforestry systems and pastures in western Amazonia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 102, 409–414.
- 2. Basak, N., Kumar, P., Mishra, A. K., Chaudhari, S. K., Rai, P., Singh, K., Singh, R., Pandey, C. B., & Sharma, D. K. (2018). Carbon pools and nutrient dynamics under Eucalyptus-based agroforestry system in semi-arid region of north-west India. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, 66(2), 188–199.
- 3. Bhavya, V. P., Anil Kumar, S., Shiva Kumar, K. M., Alur, A., & Shivanna, M. (2017). Land use systems to improve carbon sequestration in soil for mitigation of climate change. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 5(4), 2019–2021.
- 4. Blake, G. R., & Hartge, K. H. (1986). Bulk density. In A. Klute (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods (Agronomy Monograph No. 9, pp. 363–375). American Society of Agronomy.
- 5. Bray, R. H., & Kurtz, L. T. (1945). Determination of total, organic, and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Science, 59, 39–45.
- 6. Chakravarty, S., Koul, D. N., Shukla, G., & Panwar, P. (2011). Status of soil carbon sequestration under different land use systems in Terai zone of West Bengal. Environment and Ecology, 6, 95–100.
- 7. Choudhury, B. U., Mohapatra, K. P., Das, A., Das, P. T., Nongkhlaw, L., Fiyaz, A. R., Ngachan, S. V., Rajkhowa, D. J., & Munda, G. C. (2013). Spatial variability in distribution of organic carbon stocks in the soils of north-east India. Current Science, 104(5), 604–614.
- 8. Ekhuya, N., Wesonga, J., Muriuki, J., & Mowo, J. (2015). Influence of selected tree species on soil characteristics, growth and yield of maize in Western Kenya. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 10, 2399–2406.
- 9. Emma, J. S. (2005). Using experimental manipulation to assess the roles of leaf litter. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 80, 1–31.
- 10. Finzi, A. C., Allen, A. S., DeLucia, E. H., Ellsworth, D. S., & Schlesinger, W. H. (2001). Forest litter production, chemistry, and decomposition following two years of free-air CO₂ enrichment. Indian Journal of Ecology, 82, 470–484.
- 11. Hirmas, D. R., & Furquim, S. A. C. (2006). Simple modification of the clod method for determining bulk density of very gravelly soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 37, 899–906.
- 12. Jackson, M. L. (1973). Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India.
- 13. Kumar, M., Kumar, V., Kumar, R., & Pratap, R. (2017). Correlation between soil nutrient and plant nutrient concentration in mustard. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 6(4), 751–754.
- 14. Makundi, W. R., & Sathaye, J. A. (2004). GHG mitigation potential and cost in tropical forestry—Relative role for agroforestry. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 6, 235–260.
- 15. Meshram, N. A., Dalvi, V. V., Pinjari, S. S., Rathod, R. R., & Narkhade, S. S. (2020). Litter's effect on soil physicochemical and biological processes. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 90(6), 1166–1169.
- 16. Panse, V. G., & Sukhatme, P. V. (1985). Statistical methods for agricultural workers. Indian Council of Agricultural Research.
- 17. Piper, C. S. (1966). Soil and plant analysis. Hans's Publications.
- 18. Ramesh, P., Panwar, N. R., Singh, A. B., & Ramana, S. (2009). Effect of organic nutrient management practices on production potential, nutrient uptake, soil quality, input use efficiency and economics of mustard (Brassica juncea). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 79(1), 40–44.
- 19. Sankaram, A. (1966). Laboratory manual for agricultural chemistry (pp. 144–146). Asia Publishing House.
- 20. Shibu, J., & Sougata, B. (2012). Agroforestry for biomass production and carbon sequestration: An overview. Agroforestry Systems, 86, 105–111.
- 21. Singh, B., Gill, R. I. S., & Singh, [initials unavailable]., & Gill, P. (2010). Soil fertility under various tree species and poplar-based agroforestry system. Journal of Research, Punjab Agricultural University, 47, 160–164.
- 22. Singh, Y. P., Singh, G. B., Sharma, D. K., & Arora, S. (2017). Evaluation of different agroforestry systems for their effect on alkali soil. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, 65, 42–47.
- 23. Subbiah, B. V., & Asija, G. L. (1956). A rapid procedure for the estimation of nitrogen in soil. Current Science, 25, 259–260.
- 24. Tiessen, H., & Moir, J. O. (1993). Total and organic carbon. In Soil sampling and methods of analysis (pp. 187–211).
- 25. Zeng, D.-H., Mao, R., Chang, S. X., Li, L.-J., & Yang, D. (2010). Carbon mineralization of tree leaf litter and crop residues from poplar-based agroforestry systems in Northeast China: A laboratory study. Applied Soil Ecology, 44, 133–137.
- 26. Zou, S. Y., Zhang, J. L., & Feng, Z. F. (2001). Desertified land analysis in Horqin sandy land. Journal of Desert Research, 21, 76–78.
Looking up citing articles…
Copyright © 2026 Indian Journal of Agroforestry