Skip to content
Home▶ Journals▶ Indian Journal of Agroforestry▶Archive▶Vol. 27 No. 2 (2025)▶Sorghum-wheat Productivity and Soil Nutrient Status Under…
Indian Journal of Agroforestry ›
Print ISSN 0972-0715 · Online ISSN 2456-6489
Submit your paper About the journal
Articles

Sorghum-wheat Productivity and Soil Nutrient Status Under Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus Tereticornis) Boundary Plantation in Semi-arid Region

, , , , , ,
Chhavi Sirohi
Parvinder Kumar
R.S. Dhillon
K.K. Bhardwaj
K.S. Ahlawat
A.K. Handa
A. Arunachalam
Published 23 Oct 2026 Vol. 27 No. 2 (2025), pp. 126-132 ● Open access
❝ How to cite 🔗 https://doi.org/10.48165/ija.2025.27.02.15
Formats:Full text (HTML)JATS XMLPDF ● Open access
Download PDF

Abstract

Fast-growing trees, such as eucalyptus (Eucalyptus tereticornis), can be included into agricultural systems to offer a number of advantages over agriculture without trees. In semi-arid regions, windbreaks are typically utilized as a type of agroforestry (AF) to lower the wind speeds for sustainable agricultural production and other ecosystem services. Selecting appropriate crop to reduce competitive interactions in the tree interaction zone is crucial to the sustainability of windbreak agroforestry systems (AFS). It is recommended that well-modified tree-crop integration be established by reducing resource competition and leveraging coactions in order to increase AFS efficiency. A field experiment was carried out with the objective to assess the green fodder yield of sorghum and grain yield of wheat at varying distances (0-3 m, 3-6 m, 6-9 m, 9-12 m, 12-15 m, and 15-18 m) from tree line as affected by six year old eucalyptus boundary plantation in East-West and North-South directions (E-W tree line divide farmlands into two aspects i.e. Northern and Southern and N-S tree line divide into Eastern and western aspects). The green fodder yield of sorghum and grain yield of wheat declined significantly up to 9 and 3 m distance from eucalyptus tree line, respectively in all the four aspects during the study period. The maximum green fodder yield of sorghum and grain yield of wheat (36.2 and 3.33 t/ha) was recorded in north-south row direction of eucalyptus bund plantation. The variable influence of tree line directions on yield in different aspects might be attributed to micro-site enrichment caused by favourable environment due to shade and leaf litter addition. We also quantified the soil pH, EC, available nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) under six year old eucalyptus boundary plantation at varying distances (0-3 m, 3-6 m, 6-9 m, 9-12 m, 12-15 m, and 15-18 m) in East-West and North-South directions. The organic carbon showed a decreasing trend for SOC from 0-3m to 15-18m and higher organic carbon was recorded in western aspect followed by southern aspect. The available N, P and K also showed decreasing trends for N, Pand K from tree line to 15-18m of eucalyptus windbreaks AFS

KeywordsEucalyptus tereticornisBoundary plantation,Soil nutrientsGreen fodder yieldSorghumWheat grain yield
  1. 1. Bargali, S. S., Bargali, K., Singh, L., Ghosh, L., & Lakhera, M. L. (2009). Acacia nilotica-based traditional agroforestry system: Effect on paddy crop and management. Current Science, 96, 581–587.
  2. 2. Berenji, J., & Dahlberg, J. (2004). Perspectives of sorghum in Europe. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 190, 332–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2004.00102.x
  3. 3. Bhardwaj, K. K., Dhillon, R. S., Kumari, S., Johar, V., Dalal, V., & Chavan, S. B. (2017). Effect of eucalyptus bund plantation on yield of agricultural crops and soil properties in semi-arid region of India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6, 2059–2065. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.610.245
  4. 4. Chavan, S. B., Dhillon, R. S., Sirohi, C., Keerthika, A., Kumari, S., Bhardwaj, K. K., Jinger, D., Kakade, V., Chichaghare, A. R., Zin El-Abedin, T. K., Mahmou, E. A., Casini, R., Sharma, H., Elansary, H. O., & Yessoufou, K. (2022). Enhancing farm income through boundary plantation of poplar (Populus deltoides): An economic analysis. Sustainability, 14(14), Article 8663. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148663
  5. 5. Chavan, S. B., Dhillon, R. S., Sirohi, C., Saleh, I. A., Uthappa, A. R., Keerthika, A., Jinger, D., Halli, H. M., Pradhan, A., Kakade, V., Morade, A., Chichaghare, A. R., Rawale, G. B., Okla, M. K., Alaraidh, I. A., AbdElgawad, H., Fahad, S., Nandgude, S., & Singh, R. (2024). Optimizing planting geometries in eucalyptus-based food production systems for enhanced yield and carbon sequestration. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 8, Article 1386035. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1386035
  6. 6. Deng, B., Tammeorg, P., Luukkanen, O., Helenius, J., & Starr, M. (2017). Effects of Acacia seyal and biochar on soil properties and sorghum yield in agroforestry systems in South Sudan. Agroforestry Systems, 91, 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9914-2
  7. 7. Duff, J., Bice, D., Hoeffner, I., & Weinheimer, J. (2019). The sorghum industry and its market perspective. In I. A. Cimpilli & P. V. V. Prasad (Eds.), Sorghum: A state of the art and future perspectives (pp. 503–514).
  8. 8. Dupraz, C. (2013). Adaptation of plurispecific systems to climate change. In M. Pijnappels & P. Dietl (Eds.), Climate change adaptation inspiration book (pp. 134–139). Circle 2 ERA-NET.
  9. 9. Dupraz, C., Blitz-Frayret, C., Lecomte, I., Molto, Q., Reyes, F., & Gosme, M. (2018). Influence of latitude on the light availability for intercrops in an agroforestry alley-cropping system. Agroforestry Systems, 92, 1019–1033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0214-x
  10. 10. Flumignan, D. L., Silva, S. C. R. R., Salton, J. C., & Comunello, E. (2023). Diameter growth of eucalyptus trees in agroforestry systems and its relation to air temperature and precipitation. Agroforestry Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00936-x
  11. 11. Gagné, G., Lorenzetti, F., Cogliastro, A., & Rivest, D. (2022). Soybean performance under moisture limitation in a temperate tree-based intercropping system. Agroforestry Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103460
  12. 12. Gao, L., Xu, H., Bi, H., Xi, W., Bao, B., Wang, X., Bi, C., & Chang, Y. (2013). Intercropping competition between apple trees and crops in agroforestry systems on the Loess Plateau of China. PLOS ONE, 8, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070739
  13. 13. Gosh, P. K., Palsaniya, D. R., & Srinivasan, R. (2016). Forage research in India: Issues and strategies. Agricultural Research Journal, 53(1), 1–12.
  14. 14. Gosme, M., Dufour, L., Inurreta-Aguirre, H. D., & Dupraz, C. (2016). Microclimatic effect of agroforestry on diurnal temperature cycle. In European Agroforestry Conference: EURAF—Celebrating 20 years of innovations in European agroforestry (pp. 183–186).
  15. 15. Hildreth, L. A. (2008). The economic impacts of agroforestry in the Northern Plains of China. Agroforestry Systems, 72, 119–126.
  16. 16. Jackson, M. L. (1973). Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India.
  17. 17. Kaur, J., & Singh, B. (2022). Role of phosphorus and potassium nutrition in enhancing yield, nutrient use efficiency and quality of wheat under variable aged poplar (Populus deltoides Bartr.) plantations in India. Agroforestry Systems, 96, 1065–1075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-022-00766-3
  18. 18. Khalili, M., Naghavi, M. R., Aboughadareh, A. P., & Rad, H. N. (2013). Effects of drought stress on yield and yield components in maize cultivars (Zea mays L.). International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production, 4, 809–812.
  19. 19. Kulkarni, H. D. (2014). Industrial agroforestry: An ITC initiative. Indian Farming, 63(11), 42–44.
  20. 20. Mantino, A., Pecchioni, G., Tozzini, C., Mele, M., & Ragaglini, G. (2010). Agronomic performance of soybean and sorghum in a short rotation poplar coppice alley-cropping system under Mediterranean conditions. Agroforestry Systems, 97, 1025–1039.
  21. 21. Meena, L. R., Kochewad, S. A., Kumar, V., Malik, S., Kumar, S., Meena, L. K., Meena, A. L., & Panwar, A. S. (2018). Status of fodder production in the existing farming systems in Muzaffarnagar district of Uttar Pradesh. Range Management and Agroforestry, 39(2), 313–331.
  22. 22. Meijer, S. S., Catacutan, D., Ajayi, O. C., Sileshi, G. W., & Nieuwenhuis, M. (2015). The role of knowledge, attitudes and perceptions in the uptake of agricultural and agroforestry innovations among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 13, 40–54.
  23. 23. Nair, P., & Toth, G. G. (2016). Measuring agricultural sustainability in agroforestry systems. In Climate change and multi-dimensional sustainability in African agriculture (pp. 365–394). Springer.
  24. 24. Olsen, S. R., Cole, C. V., & Watanabe, F. S. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate (USDA Circular No. 939). United States Department of Agriculture.
  25. 25. Patel, A. D., Jadeja, H. R., & Pandey, A. N. (2010). Effect of soil salinity on growth, water status and nutrient accumulation in seedlings of Acacia auriculiformis (Fabaceae). Journal of Plant Nutrition, 33, 914–932.
  26. 26. Peichl, M., Thevathasan, N. V., Gordon, A. M., Huss, J., & Abohassanm, R. A. (2006). Carbon sequestration potentials in temperate tree-based intercropping systems, southern Ontario, Canada. Agroforestry Systems, 66, 243–257.
  27. 27. Righi, C. A., & Foltran, D. E. (2018). Broomcorn [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] responses to shade: An agroforestry system interface simulation. Agroforestry Systems, 92, 693–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-0036-7
  28. 28. Salunkhe, S., Nandgude, S., Tiwari, M., Bhange, H., & Chavan, S. B. (2023). Land suitability planning for sustainable mango production in vulnerable region using geospatial multi-criteria decision model. Sustainability, 15, Article 2619. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032619
  29. 29. Sirohi, C., & Bangarwa, K. S. (2017). Effect of different spacings of poplar-based agroforestry system on soil chemical properties and nutrient status in Haryana, India. Current Science, 113(7), 1403–1407.
  30. 30. Sirohi, C., Dhillon, R. S., Chavan, S. B., Handa, A. K., Balyan, P., Bhardwaj, K. K., Kumari, S., & Ahlawat, K. S. (2022a). Development of poplar-based alley crop system for fodder production and soil improvements in semi-arid tropics. Agroforestry Systems, 96, 731–745.
  31. 31. Sirohi, C., Bangarwa, K. S., Dhillon, R. S., Chavan, S. B., & Handa, A. K. (2022b). Productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and soil fertility with poplar (Populus deltoides) agroforestry system in the semi-arid ecosystem of Haryana, India. Current Science, 122(9), 1072–1080.
  32. 32. Smethurst, P. J., Huth, N. I., Masikati, P., Sileshi, G. W., Akinnifesi, F. K., Wilson, J., & Sinclair, F. (2017). Accurate crop yield predictions from modelling tree-crop interactions in gliricidia-maize agroforestry. Agroforestry Systems, 155, 70–77.
  33. 33. Subbiah, B. V., & Asija, G. L. (1956). A rapid procedure for the estimation of the available nitrogen in soils. Current Science, 25, 259–260.
  34. 34. Sudmeyer, R. A., & Speijers, J. (2007). Influence of windbreak orientation, shade and rainfall interception on wheat and lupin growth in the absence of below-ground competition. Agroforestry Systems, 71, 201–214.
  35. 35. Tenywa, M. M., Nyamwaro, S. O., Kalibwani, R., Mogabo, J., Buruchara, R., & Fatunbi, A. O. (2018). Innovation opportunities in sorghum production in Uganda. FARA Research Reports, 2(18), 20.
  36. 36. Walkley, A., & Black, I. A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37, 29–37.
  37. 37. Zhang, W., Wang, B. J., Gan, Y. W., Duan, Z. P., Hao, X. D., Xu, W. L., & Li, L. H. (2017). Different tree age affects light competition and yield in wheat grown as a companion crop in jujube-wheat agroforestry. Agroforestry Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0160-z

Looking up citing articles…

    Copyright © 2026 Indian Journal of Agroforestry