Skip to content
Home▶ Journals▶ Indian Journal of Agroforestry▶Archive▶Vol. 27 No. 2 (2025)▶Plantation-based Jhumias Rehabilitation in Tripura:…
Indian Journal of Agroforestry ›
Print ISSN 0972-0715 · Online ISSN 2456-6489
Submit your paper About the journal
Articles

Plantation-based Jhumias Rehabilitation in Tripura: Exploring the Challenges and Traditional Practices in Overcoming Crises

,
Vanlalrema Kuki — Department of Economics, Iswar Chandra Vidyasagar College
Indraneel Bhowmik — Department of Economics, Tripura University, Suryamaninagar
Published 22 Oct 2026 Vol. 27 No. 2 (2025), pp. 27-38 ● Open access
❝ How to cite 🔗 https://doi.org/10.48165/ija.2025.27.02.04
Formats:Full text (HTML)JATS XMLPDF ● Open access
Download PDF

Abstract

Plantation crop cultivation is becoming a significant occupation in Tripura among the Scheduled Tribes owing to its potential economic viability. The state government adopted a plantation model to rehabilitate the jhumias through various agencies while working with the Tribal Welfare Department and the Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District Council. However, the cultivation has threats. The beneficiaries met different challenges during plantation development under various models. The present study revealed that the low quality of saplings was considered the foremost challenge during rehabilitation. Besides, strong wind, poor management, insect menace, lack of storage facilities, infrastructure and institutional challenges are other potential risks and difficulties leading to losses. The most common response strategies adopted by the beneficiaries are marketing-based response and production-related mechanisms. They are also using traditional knowledge to avoid economic and farms related problems.

KeywordsPeopleRehabilitation schemeChallenges and coping strategy
  1. 1. Ayantunde, A. A., Turner, M. D., & Kalilou, A. (2015). Participatory analysis of vulnerability to drought in three agro-pastoral communities in the West African Sahel. Pastoralism: Research, Policy & Practice, 5, Article 13, 1–11.
  2. 2. Bhowmik, I. (2013). Rubber based rehabilitation in Tripura. Development Dynamics, 1(2), 7–18.
  3. 3. Bhowmik, I., & Chattopadhyay, P. K. (2018). Tripura's tryst with rubber. In A. K. Dasgupta (Ed.), Inclusive development: New challenges and opportunities (Working Paper Vol. VII, pp. 53–70). Centre for Planning and Development, Visva-Bharati.
  4. 4. Chouhan, P., Kuki, V., & Bhowmik, I. (2019). A study on the emerging labour relations in the rubber plantations of Tripura. Indian Journal of Economics and Development, 7(4), 1–14.
  5. 5. Devvarman, S. B. K. (1999). A study over the Jhum and Jhumia rehabilitation in the Union Territory of Tripura (Reprint 2, Vol. I, pp. 27–53). Directorate of Research, Department of Welfare for Scheduled Tribes and Scheduled Castes, Government of Tripura.
  6. 6. Food and Agriculture Organization. (1999). From evolution to revolution in agriculture: The FAO field programme and agricultural development in Asia and the Pacific (RAP Publication 1999/28). FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific.
  7. 7. Hassan, S., Ismail, N., Jaafar, W. Y. W., Ghazali, K., Budin, K., Gabda, D., & Samad, A. S. A. (2012). Using factor analysis on survey study of factors affecting students’ learning styles. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Informatics, 6(1), 33–40.
  8. 8. Kalita, B. J., & Bhuyan, A. (2017). An assessment of the problems and prospects of jute farmers in Assam. In R. Mahanta & N. A. Barua (Eds.), Agriculture in North-East India: Present status and the scenario ahead (pp. 17–33). Maliyata Offset Press.
  9. 9. Krishnakumar, A. K., & Meenattoor. (1999). Cultivation in non-traditional areas. In P. J. George & C. Kuruvilla Jacob (Eds.), Natural rubber: Agromanagement and crop processing (pp. 487–500). Rubber Research Institute of India.
  10. 10. Kuki, V., & Bhowmik, I. (2022). Jhumming to tapping: Exploring the economic, social and political linkages. Aitihya: The Heritage, 13(2), 54–67.
  11. 11. Lama, M., & Bordoloi, R. (2017). Potato productivity and its determinants: A case study in Sonitpur District, Assam. Social Change and Development, 14, 70–80.
  12. 12. Molnar, A., Jansen, M., & Campbell, J. G. (1995). Institutional and environmental issues for forest and wasteland development in India. In S. Shen & A. Contreras-Hermosilla (Eds.), Environmental and economic issues in forestry: Selected case studies in Asia (World Bank Technical Paper No. 281, pp. 57–70). The World Bank.
  13. 13. Nigam, A. K., Srivastava, R., Tiwari, P. P., Saxena, R., & Shukla, S. (2014). District level food insecurity in the state of Uttar Pradesh. Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, 63(3), 407–417.
  14. 14. Penot, E., & Trouillard, K. (2002). Diversification of perennial crops to offset market uncertainties: The case of traditional rubber farming systems in West Kalimantan. In Proceedings of the 17th Symposium of the International Farming Systems Association (November 17–20, pp. 1–10). University of Florida.
  15. 15. Pichler, M. (2015). Legal dispossession: State strategies and selectivities in the expansion of Indonesia palm oil and agrofuel production. Development and Change, 46(3), 508–533.
  16. 16. Ray, D. (2014). Development economics. Oxford University Press.
  17. 17. Reang, D. (1999). Jhumia settlement scheme: An evaluation. Tui: A Quarterly Research Journal on Tribal Life & Culture, 7(1), 27–53.
  18. 18. Reddy, R. C. M. (1999). Jhumias in transition. Tui: A Quarterly Research Journal on Tribal Life & Culture, 7(2), 1–19.
  19. 19. Reddy, G. M., & Kumar, A. K. (2010). Political economy of tribal development: A case study of Andhra Pradesh (Working Paper No. 85). Centre for Economic and Social Studies.
  20. 20. Rudra, A. (1989). Field survey methods. In P. Bardhan (Ed.), Conversations between economists and anthropologists: Methodological issues in measuring economic change in rural India (pp. 218–237). Oxford University Press.
  21. 21. Rummel, R. J. (1970). Applied factor analysis. Northwestern University Press.
  22. 22. Sharma, R. (2018). Rural livelihood diversity and its impact on livelihood outcome: An empirical investigation from Jammu and Kashmir. The Indian Economic Journal, 64(1–4), 203–217.
  23. 23. Swain, M., & Patnaik, S. (2016). Performance assessment of crop insurance schemes in Odisha in Eastern India (Working Paper No. 104-16). SANDEE.
  24. 24. Viswanathan, P. K., & Shivakoti, G. P. (2006). Economic integration of tribal societies in the post-reforms era: Perspectives on rubber-based farming systems in North East India. North East India Studies, 1(2), 80–106.
  25. 25. Viswanathan, P. K. (2008). Adoption of rubber-integrated farm-livelihood systems: Controlling empirical evidence from the Indian context. Journal of Forest Research, 13, 1–14.
  26. 26. Viswanathan, P. K., & Shah, A. (2013). Trade reforms and crisis in India's plantation industry: An analysis of tea and rubber plantation sectors. Social Change and Development, 10(2), 31–85.
  27. 27. Viswanathan, P. K., & Bhowmik, I. (2014). Compatibility of institutional architecture for rubber plantation development in North East India from a comparative perspective of Kerala (NRPD Discussion Paper No. 38). Centre for Development Studies.
  28. 28. Watete, P. W., Makau, W. K., Njoka, J. T., Opiyo, L. A., & Mwangi, S. (2016). Are there options outside the livestock economy? Diversification among households of northern Kenya. Pastoralism: Research, Policy & Practice, 6, Article 3, 1–13.
  29. 29. Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2), 79–94.

Looking up citing articles…

    Copyright © 2026 Indian Journal of Agroforestry