Morphometric and Qualitative Response of Onion Varieties in Poplar-vegetable Based Agroforestry System

Ankita k; Rishi I S Gill; Navneet Kaur; Harmandeep Kaur

doi:10.48165/ija.2025.27.02.01

Abstract

Vegetable-based agroforestry has prompted deep interest, considering the dietary, economic, and multifarious utility of onion (Allium cepa L.) which is an important vegetable crop; the present study was conducted at Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India for two years, 2018-19 and 2019-20 under split-split plot design. The six onion varieties (POH-1, PRO-6, PRO-7, PWO-2, PYO-1 and Punjab Naroya) were planted in two environments (poplar and open) at three planting times (mid-December, end-December and mid-January). The morphological and qualitative performance of onion varied significantly with transplanting time and amongst the varieties. With the advancement of planting time, the height no. of leaves and neck thickness showed a declining trend. The mid-December planted seedlings, shown taller plants (64.69 and 65.18 cm) with maximum leaves (7.41 and 6.08) and neck thickness (1.25 cm and 1.56 cm) followed by end December. Among the six onion varieties, PRO-7 was significantly taller (65.71cm and 61.37cm) with maximum no. of leaves (7.28 and 6.16) and took minimum number of days to bulb initiation (68) and maturity (122). PYO-1 recorded significantly more neck thickness than other varieties but at par with Pb. Naroya. Nevertheless, PWO-2 produced significantly higher mean dry matter content (15.14%) as well as total soluble solids, (13.11%) thus better variety in quality in both the years. Conversely, the variety PYO-1 performed poorly both in terms of growth and quality (DMC-9.8% and TSS- 10.02%) indicating it may not be the most suitable choice for cultivation under poplar. The mean performance of the three planting times showed that maximum DMC was produced in mid-December planted crop and decreased towards mid-January planting time while TSS remained insignificant for transplanting times. Henceforth, variety PWO-2 performed better with poplar for nutritional value while variety PRO-7 has proved better in terms of substantial growth rate.

KeywordsAgroforestryOnionPlanting timesQualityVarietiesVegetable

1. Bardisi, S. A., El-Ghamriny, E. A., Gad, A. A., & Nawar, D. A. S. (2013). Bulbing ratio and dry weight of onion plant grown in sandy soil as affected by planting date, planting distance and potassium fertilizer rate. Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research, 40, 399–410.
2. Bhardwaj, A., Kaur, N., Dhat, A. S., & Gill, R. I. S. (2021). Optimization of onion planting time and variety under Populus deltoides-based agroforestry system in North-Western India. Agroforestry Systems, 95, 533–546.
3. Brewster, J. L. (1982). Growth, dry matter production and radiation interception in an over wintered bulb onion (Allium cepa L.) crop. Annals of Botany, 49, 609–617.
4. Caruso, G., Conti, S., Villari, G., Borrelli, C., Melchionna, G., Minutolo, M., Russo, G., & Amalfitano, C. (2014). Effect of transplanting time and plant density on yield, quality and antioxidant content of onion (Allium cepa L.) in southern Italy. Scientia Horticulturae, 166, 111–120.
5. Chattopadhyay, A., Sharangi, A. B., Dutta, S., Das, S., & Denre, M. (2013). Genetic relatedness between quantitative and qualitative parameters in onion (Allium cepa L.). Vegetos, 26(1), 151–157.
6. Gouda, G. P., Ramachandra, C. T., Mareppa, Ramya, V., & Lavanya. (2016). Physico-chemical and functional properties of different onion varieties. Environment and Ecology, 34, 2621–2623.
7. Hamma, I. L. (2013). Growth and yield of onion as influenced by planting dates and mulching types in Samaru, Zaria. International Journal of Advanced Agricultural Research, 1, 23–26.
8. Jilani, M. S., Khan, M. Q., & Rahman, S. (2009). Planting densities effect on yield and yield components of onion (Allium cepa L.). Journal of Scientific and Agricultural Research, 47, 397–404.
9. Khokhar, K. M. (2008). Effect of set-size and planting time on the incidence of bolting, bulbing, and seed yield in two onion cultivars. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 83, 481–487.
10. Kimani, P. M., Kariuki, J. W., Peters, P., & Rabinowitch, H. D. (1993). Influence of the environment on the performance of some onion cultivars in Kenya. African Crop Science Journal, 1(1).
11. Lancaster, J. E., Triggs, C. M., De Ruiter, J. M., & Gandar, P. W. (1996). Bulbing in onions: Photoperiod and temperature requirements and prediction of bulb size and maturity. Annals of Botany, 78, 423–430.
12. Mahantesh, B., Ravi, P. S. M., Harshavardhan, M., Vishnuvardhana, M., & Janardhan, G. (2008). Evaluation of different onion genotypes for yield and processing quality parameters in kharif season under irrigated conditions. The Asian Journal of Horticulture, 3(1), 5–9.
13. Mahanthesh, B., Venkatesha, J., Thippesha, D., Harshavarddhan, M., & Umesha, K. (2005). Bulb size and other characters of onion bulbs as influenced by onion cultivars in rainy season. Karnataka Journal of Horticulture, 1, 1–6.
14. Maw, B. M., & Mullinix, B. G. (2005). Moisture loss of sweet onions during curing. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 35, 223–227.
15. Misra, A. D. D., Kumar, A., & Meitei, W. I. (2014). Effect of spacing and planting time on growth and yield of onion var. N-53 under Manipur Himalayas. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 71, 207–210.
16. Nesmith, D. S. (1993). Transplant age influences summer squash growth and yield. HortScience, 28, 618–620.
17. Ram, R. B., Bharti, N., Meena, M. L., Lata, R., & Babu, M. (2011). Genetic variability and correlation in onion (Allium cepa L.). Vegetos, 24, 152–156.
18. Sharma, A. K. (2009). Evaluation of onion varieties in kharif season under submontane low hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh. Annals of Horticulture, 2, 191–193.
19. Sharma, D., Banyal, S. K., & Chauhan, A. (n.d.). Kharif onion cultivation—a boon for the farmers of Northern India. Indian Horticulture, 65(2).
20. Shrestha, J., Kandel, M., & Chaudhary, A. (2018). Effects of planting time on growth, development and productivity of maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 1(1), 43–50.

Looking up citing articles…