Valorisation Of Poultry Byproducts for Complementary Pet Food Production:  A Circular Economy Approach

Authors

  • J Venkateswarlu NTR College of Veterinary Science, SVVU, Gannavaram-521101, A.P
  • Yogesh P Gadekar ICAR-National Meat Research Institute, Hyderabad – 500 092
  • Y R Ambedkar College of Veterinary Science, Garividi, A.P
  • E Nagamallika College of Veterinary Science, Garividi, A.P
  • T Prasada Rao College of Veterinary Science, Garividi, A.P

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/jms.2025.20.02.7

Keywords:

Pet food, Poultry byproducts, Nutrient analysis, Pet nutrition

Abstract

The pet food market is rapidly expanding as pet owners increasingly seek  high-quality diets for their dogs. The pet food industry utilizes approximately  23% of the rendered poultry proteins produced annually. Poultry byproduct  meal (PBM) is derived from poultry slaughter waste, including heads, viscera,  feathers, and other byproducts. The fat in PBM is rendered and repurposed.  For the production of extruded dry pet food for adult dogs, a formulation was  developed. This mixture is processed through a twin-screw extruder at 120°C,  resulting in extruded dry pet food. The pet food was analysed for various  parameters like water activity of 0.41 and in-vitro digestibility of 78.24%. The  calcium, phosphorus, iron, Zinc, magnesium, and manganese levels were  recorded at 0.95%, 0.59%, 610mg, 51mg, 0.0046mg, 20mg/kg, respectively. The  proximate composition of the pet food indicated moisture content at 1.54%,  protein at 23.8%, crude fat at 8.7%, crude fibre at 2.0%, and total ash at 0.98%.  Colour parameters revealed a lightness (L*) of 28.66, redness (a*) of 8.20, and  yellowness (b*) of 17.20 and the amino acid profile was analysed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AAFCO (2014). Association of American Feed Control Officials methods for substantiating nutritional adequacy of dog and cat foods.

Aldrich, G. C., & Koppel, K. (2015). Pet food palatability evaluation: A review of standard assay techniques and interpretation of results with a primary focus on limitations. Animal, 5(1), 43–55.

AOAC (1995). Official methods of analysis, 16th edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, Virginia, USA.

Baser, O., & Yalcin, S. (2017). Determination of some quality characteristics in pet foods. Veterinary Faculty Journal, 64(1), 21–24.

Biagi, G., Cipollini, I., Grandi, M., Pinna, C., Vecchiato, C. G., & Zaghini, G. (2016). A new in vitro method to evaluate digestibility of commercial diets for dogs. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 15(4), 617–625.

Castrillo, C., Vicente, F., & Guada, J. A. (2001). The effect of crude fibre on apparent digestibility and digestible energy content of extruded dog foods. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 85(7–8), 231–236.

Chau, V. T. P. (2021). Characterization of functional physical properties of dry pet food manufactured with animal and plant ingredients.

Dust, J. M., Grieshop, C. M., Parsons, C. M., Karr-Lilienthal, L. K., Schasteen, C. S., Quigley, J. D. III, & Fahey, G. C. Jr. (2005). Chemical composition, protein quality, palatability and digestibility of alternative protein sources for dogs. Journal of Animal Science, 83(10), 2414–2422.

Karthik, P., Kulkarni, V. V., & Sivakumar, K. (2010). Preparation, storage stability and palatability of spent hen meal-based pet food. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 47, 330–334.

Mozhiarasi, V., & Natarajan, T. S. (2022). Slaughterhouse and poultry wastes: Management practices, feedstocks for renewable energy production and recovery of value-added products. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 1–24.

National Research Council (2006). Nutrient requirements of dogs and cats. National Academy Press, Washington DC, USA.

Nongmaithem, R., Meda, V., Niranjan, T., Shukla, R. M., Hashmi, S., & Dwivedi, M. (2024). Effect of extrusion on germinated lentil-based snack foods: Impact on starch digestibility, physio-functional and antioxidant properties. Measurement: Food, 13, 100132.

Pame, K., Sathu, T., Vasudevan, V. N., Prajwal, S., & Gunasekaran, P. (2017). Effect of physicochemical characteristics, palatability and storage quality of kibbles incorporated with slaughterhouse by-products for canines. International Journal of Livestock Research, 7, 228–237.

Penazzi, L., Schiavone, A., Russo, N., Nery, J., Valle, E., Madrid, J., & Prola, L. (2021). In vivo and in vitro digestibility of extruded dog food containing black soldier fly larvae meal as protein source. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8, 653411.

Scott, W. J. (1957). Water relations of food spoilage microorganisms. Advances in Food Research, 7, 83–127.

Trivedi, N., & Benning, J. (2003). Palatability keys. In: Petfood Technology. Mount Morris, Illinois, USA, pp. 178–179.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-05

How to Cite

Venkateswarlu, J., P Gadekar, Y., Ambedkar, Y. . R., Nagamallika, E., & Prasada Rao, T. (2026). Valorisation Of Poultry Byproducts for Complementary Pet Food Production:  A Circular Economy Approach. Journal of Meat Science, 20(2), 54-58. https://doi.org/10.48165/jms.2025.20.02.7