Pubic Symphyseal Age Estimation from Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Pelvic CT Scans
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/jfmt.2026.43.01.01Keywords:
Forensic age estimation; pubic symphysis; 3D CT reconstruction; Indian population; Forensic radiologyAbstract
Background: Accurate age estimation remains a cornerstone of forensic identification. Among several skeletal markers, the pubic symphysis has emerged as a reliable site for adult age assessment due to its predictable morphological changes. Conventional methods like Todd’s and Suchey–Brooks phase systems have been widely used. However, these are primar ily based on direct skeletal examination, which may not always be feasible. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of age estimation from three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans using estab lished morphological phase systems. the pubic symphysis has emerged as a reliable site, assessing its application in living individuals for forensic purposes in the Indian population. Materials and Methods: CT scans of adult pelvises were reconstructed in 3D and analyzed for morphological changes at the pubic symphysis. A comparative analysis was conducted between Todd’s 10-phase system, McKern-Stewart’s component-based method, Gilbert-McKern’s female-specific modification, and the Suchey–Brooks six-phase system. Morphological features such as dorsal plateau, ventral rampart, and symphyseal rim were evaluated across age and sex strata. Statistical tools were used to assess interobserver agreement, correlations, and accuracy. Results and Conclusion: 3D CT reconstructions provided clear visualization of morphological changes, facilitating precise phase identification. The Suchey–Brooks and McKern-Stewart systems showed significant concordance with chronological age, and the component-based approach demonstrated higher objectivity and repeatability. Age estimation was more reliable in males due to the confounding effect of childbirth-related changes in females. Three-dimensional CT reconstruction is a promising, non-invasive tool for age estimation using pubic symphyseal mor phology. Its application can enhance forensic accuracy in living individuals and skeletal remains, particularly in regions like India where population-specific standards are needed. Future studies should focus on creating localized databases for improved forensic applicability.References
Spradley, M. K. (2016). Metric methods for the biological profile in forensic anthropology: Sex, ancestry, and stature. Academic Forensic Pathology, 6(3), 391–399.
Schmeling, A., Dettmeyer, R., Rudolf, E., Vieth, V., & Geserick, G. (2016). Forensic age estimation. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 113(4), 44–50.
Austin, D., & King, R. E. (2016). The biological profile of unidentified human remains in a forensic context. Academic Forensic Pathology, 6(3), 370–390.
Rojas-Torres, J., Martínez-Durán, L., de Anta, J. M., Bucchi, C., Fonseca, G. M., & Salazar, L. A. (2025). Accuracy and challenges in age estimation in adults: A scoping review of anthropological, dental, biochemical, and molecular methods. Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology.
Austin, D., & King, R. E. (2016). The biological profile of unidentified human remains in a forensic context. Academic Forensic Pathology, 6(3), 370–390.
Franklin, D. (2010). Forensic age estimation in human skeletal remains: Current concepts and future directions. Legal Medicine, 12(1), 1–7.
Schmitt, A., Murail, P., Cunha, E., & Rougé, D. (2002). Variability of the pattern of aging on the human skeleton: Evidence from bone indicators and implications on age at death estimation. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 47(6), 1203–1209.
Singh, S., Sarma, D. K., Verma, V., Nagpal, R., & Kumar, M. (2023). From cells to environment: Exploring the interplay between factors shaping bone health and disease. Medicina, 59(9), 1546.
Dudzik, B., & Langley, N. R. (2015). Estimating age from the pubic symphysis: A new component-based system. Forensic Science International, 257, 98–105.
Sarajlić, N., & Gradaščević, A. (2012). Morphological characteristics of pubic symphysis for age estimation of exhumed persons. Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences, 12(1), 51–54.
Sinha, A., & Gupta, V. (1995). A study on estimation of age from pubic symphysis. Forensic Science International, 75(1), 73–78.
Lynnerup, N., & Villa, C. (2014). Age estimation of skeletal remains: Principal methods. Research and Reports in Forensic Medical Science, 3.
Ubelaker, D. H., & Khosrowshahi, H. (2019). Estimation of age in forensic anthropology: Historical perspective and recent methodological advances. Forensic Sciences Research, 4(1), 1–9.
Mamabolo, B., Alblas, A., & Brits, D. (2020). Modern imaging modalities in forensic anthropology and the potential of low-dose X-rays. Forensic Imaging, 23, 200406.
Wink, A. E. (2014). Pubic symphyseal age estimation from three-dimensional reconstructions of pelvic CT scans of live individuals. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 59(3), 696–702.
Warrier, V., Kanchan, T., Shedge, R., Krishan, K., & Singh, S. (2021). Computed tomographic age estimation from the pubic symphysis using the Suchey–Brooks method: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Forensic Science International, 325, 110811.
Chiba, F., Makino, Y., Motomura, A., Inokuchi, G., Torimitsu, S., Ishii, N., et al. (2014). Age estimation by quantitative features of pubic symphysis using multidetector computed tomography. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 128(4), 667–673.
Garvin, H. M., & Stock, M. K. (2016). The utility of advanced imaging in forensic anthropology. Academic Forensic Pathology, 6(3), 499–516.
Colman, K. L., de Boer, H. H., Dobbe, J. G. G., Liberton, N. P. T. J., Stull, K. E., van Eijnatten, M., et al. (2019). Virtual forensic anthropology: The accuracy of osteometric analysis of 3D bone models derived from clinical computed tomography scans. Forensic Science International, 304, 109963.
Kanaujia, V. K., Kumar, A., & Yadav, S. P. (2024). Advancements in automatic kidney segmentation using deep learning frameworks and volumetric segmentation techniques for CT imaging: A review. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 31(5), 3151–3169.
Lottering, N., MacGregor, D. M., Meredith, M., Alston, C. L., & Gregory, L. S. (2013). Evaluation of the Suchey–Brooks method of age estimation in an Australian subpopulation using computed tomography of the pubic symphyseal surface. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 150(3), 386–399.
Sarajlić, N., & Gradaščević, A. (2012). Morphological characteristics of pubic symphysis for age estimation of exhumed persons. Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences, 12(1), 51–54.
Kim, Y., Lee, K. W., Lee, S., Woo, E. J., & Hu, K. S. (2025). Age-related morphological changes of the pubic symphyseal surface using three-dimensional statistical shape modeling. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 494.
Lottering, N., Reynolds, M. S., MacGregor, D. M., Meredith, M., & Gregory, L. S. (2014). Morphometric modelling of ageing in the human pubic symphysis: Sexual dimorphism in an Australian population. Forensic Science International, 236, 195.e1–195.e11.
Fortes, C. M. T., Goldberg, T. B. L., Kurokawa, C. S., Silva, C. C., Moretto, M. R., Biason, T. P., et al. (2014). Relationship between chronological and bone ages and pubertal stage of breasts with bone biomarkers and bone mineral density in adolescents. Journal of Pediatrics (Rio J), 90(6), 624–631.
Warrier, V., Shedge, R., Krishan, K., & Kanchan, T. (2023). McKern–Stewart method as a technique for analysing age-related pubic symphyseal changes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine, Science and the Law, 63(1), 31–41.
Klepinger, L. L., Katz, D., Micozzi, M. S., & Carroll, L. (1992). Evaluation of cast methods for estimating age from the os pubis. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 37(3), 763–770.
Joubert, L. C., Briers, N., & Meyer, A. (2019). Evaluation of the Suchey–Brooks age estimation method in a white South African population. Forensic Science International, 301, e14–e19.
