Skip to content
Home▶ Journals▶ Indian Journal of Extension Education▶Archive▶Vol. 62 No. 4 (2026)▶Drivers of Farmers’ Intention to Adopt Digital Platforms…
Indian Journal of Extension Education
Research Article

Drivers of Farmers’ Intention to Adopt Digital Platforms for Natural Farming Inputs in Andhra Pradesh

,
Aravind Kumar Saride — Research Scholar
Mrigank Sharad — Assistant Professor, Rajendra Mishra School of Engineering Entrepreneurship, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, West Bengal, India
Published 28 Sep 2026 Vol. 62 No. 4 (2026), pp. 207-213 ● Open access
Formats:PDF ● Open access
Download PDF

Abstract

The study examined the drivers of farmers’ intention to adopt a Natural Farming digital input platform. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology was extended by incorporating Personal Innovativeness, Perceived Cost and Perceived Risk alongside Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, Social Influence and Facilitating Conditions. Primary data were collected between July and November 2024 from 795 Natural Farming farmers across Andhra Pradesh, employing a structured questionnaire through direct interviews and supported by Rythu Sadhikara Samstha, the state nodal agency for Natural Farming. An integrated methodology combining a two-stage Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling with an Artificial Neural Network approach, complemented by Importance Performance Map Analysis, was employed. Results showed a positive and significant influence of Personal Innovativeness, Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy and Facilitating Conditions on behavioural intention, explaining 51.8% of its variance, while Social Influence, Perceived Cost and Perceived Risk were statistically non-significant. The Artificial Neural Network sensitivity analysis confirmed Personal Innovativeness as the most important predictor. Strengthening rural digital infrastructure and designing intuitive regional-language interfaces could accelerate inclusive adoption intention among small and marginal farmers.

KeywordsNatural farmingBehavioural intentionUnified theory of acceptance and use of technologyStructural equation modellingArtificial neural network

The full text of this article is available as a PDF.

Download PDF
  1. Ahn, M., Kang, J., & Hustvedt, G. (2016). A model of sustainable household technology acceptance. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40(1), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12217
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  3. Alharbi, A., & Sohaib, O. (2021). Technology readiness and cryptocurrency adoption: PLS-SEM and deep learning neural network analysis. IEEE Access, 9, 21388–21394. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3055785
  4. Alhumaid, K., Habes, M., & Salloum, S. A. (2021). Examining the factors influencing the mobile learning usage during COVID-19 pandemic: An integrated SEM-ANN method. IEEE Access, 9, 102567–102578. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3097753
  5. Al-Saedi, K., Al-Emran, M., Ramayah, T., & Abusham, E. (2020). Developing a general extended UTAUT model for M-payment adoption. Technology in Society, 62, 101293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101293
  6. Balla, J., & Goswami, K. (2022). Understanding the constraints and reasons to adopt natural farming – A study on rice growing farmers of Andhra Pradesh, India. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 20(6), 1209–1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2022.2070340
  7. Bharucha, Z. P., Mitjans, S. B., & Pretty, J. (2020). Towards redesign at scale through zero budget natural farming in Andhra Pradesh, India. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 18(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2019.1694465
  8. Centre for Economic and Social Studies. (2019). Impact assessment of zero budget natural farming in Andhra Pradesh: 2018–2019 report. https://apcnf.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/CESS-2018-2019-Report.pdf
  9. Chin, K. Y., Lee, K. F., & Chen, Y. L. (2015). Impact on student motivation by using a QR-based u-learning material production system to create authentic learning experiences. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 8(4), 367–382. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2015.2416717
  10. Cimino, A., Coniglio, I. M., Corvello, V., Longo, F., Sagawa, J. K., & Solina, V. (2024). Exploring small farmers’ behavioral intention to adopt digital platforms for sustainable and successful agricultural ecosystems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 204, 123436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123436
  11. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  12. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  13. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
  14. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  15. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  16. Hew, T. S., & Kadir, S. L. S. A. (2016). Predicting instructional effectiveness of cloud-based virtual learning environment. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(8), 1557–1584. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-11-2015-0475
  17. Hu, Z., Ding, S., Li, S., Chen, L., & Yang, S. (2019). Adoption intention of fintech services for bank users: An empirical examination with an extended technology acceptance model. Symmetry, 11(3), 340. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11030340
  18. Jain, M., Soni, G., Mangla, S. K., Verma, D., Toshniwal, V. P., & Ramtiyal, B. (2025). Mediating and moderating role of socioeconomic and technological factors in assessing farmers’ attitude towards adoption of Industry 4.0 technology. British Food Journal, 127(5), 1810–1830. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-12-2023-1139
  19. Koner, N., & Laha, A. (2021). Economics of alternative models of organic farming: Empirical evidences from zero budget natural farming and scientific organic farming in West Bengal, India. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 19(3–4), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2021.1905346
  20. Kumar, S., Nain, M. S., Sangeetha, V., & Satyapriya. (2023). Determinants and constraints for adoption of zero budget natural farming (ZBNF) practices in farmer field school. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 59(4), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2023.59427
  21. Kumar, S., Nain, M. S., Sangeetha, V., Satyapriya, Das, S., Anbukkani, P., & Khan, S. A. (2025). Measuring sustainability of zero-budget natural farming practices. Journal of Community Mobilization and Sustainable Development, 20(2), 613–618. https://doi.org/10.5958/2231-6736.2025.00141.4
  22. Kumar, S. (2025). Determining the knowledge level and accessibility of major ICT tools by farmers in Madhya Pradesh. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 61(4), 101–105. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2025.61417
  23. Larasati, N., Putri, A. A., Soemodinoto, A. S., Alyssa, N., & Shoofiyani, O. S. (2024). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model to understand farmers’ readiness: Implementation of precision agriculture based on digital IoT monitoring apps in West Java, Indonesia. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 14(4), 176–183. https://doi.org/10.55493/5005.v14i4.5258
  24. Lee, C. T., Pan, L. Y., & Hsieh, S. H. (2022). Artificial intelligent chatbots as brand promoters: A two-stage structural equation modeling–artificial neural network approach. Internet Research, 32(4), 1329–1356. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-01-2021-0030
  25. Leong, L. Y., Hew, T. S., Ooi, K. B., & Wei, J. (2020). Predicting mobile wallet resistance: A two-staged structural equation modeling–artificial neural network approach. International Journal of Information Management, 51, 102047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102047
  26. Li, L., Min, X., Guo, J., & Wu, F. (2024). The influence mechanism analysis on the farmers’ intention to adopt Internet of Things based on UTAUT-TOE model. Scientific Reports, 14, 15016. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65415-4
  27. Lin, D., Fu, B., Xie, K., Zheng, W., Chang, L., & Lin, J. (2023). Research on the improvement of digital literacy for moderately scaled tea farmers under the background of digital intelligence empowerment. Agriculture, 13(10), 1859. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101859
  28. Luarn, P., & Lin, H. H. (2005). Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(6), 873–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.003
  29. Mangudhla, T., Zhao, X., Tong, J. J. J., Ahakwa, I., Bram, A. K., & Boadi, E. B. (2026). Examining adaptive capacities of tobacco farmers in Zimbabwe: The role of climate information and livelihood diversification in climate change adaptation – A PLS-SEM, ANN and fsQCA approach. Sustainable Development, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70853
  30. Mastiholi, A. B., Sowmya, B., Maheswarappa, H. P., Gondi, S. P., Shantappa, T., Rudresh, D. L., & Gopali, J. B. (2023). Organic and natural farming improve microbial diversity and dehydrogenase activity in cluster bean–tomato cropping sequence. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 69(15), 3705–3716. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2023.2273899
  31. Morepje, M. T., Sithole, M. Z., Msweli, N. S., & Agholor, A. I. (2024). The influence of e-commerce platforms on sustainable agriculture practices among smallholder farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa. Sustainability, 16(15), 6496. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156496
  32. NITI Aayog. (2025a, January 3). Implementation progress. Retrieved January 3, 2025, from https://naturalfarming.dac.gov.in/NaturalFarming/ImplementationProcess
  33. NITI Aayog. (2025b, April 17). Natural farming. Retrieved April 17, 2025, from https://naturalfarming.niti.gov.in/
  34. Pragnya, P. N., Vardhan, P. N. H., Kumar, A., Nihal, R., Mounika, T., & Pulletikurthi, V. (2026). Determinants of farmers’ knowledge and safe pesticide utilisation behaviour: Artificial neural network approach. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 62(3), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2026.62322
  35. Press Information Bureau. (2024). Universal connectivity and Digital India initiatives reaching to all areas, including tier-2/3 cities and villages [Press release]. https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=2040566
  36. Sabbir, M. M., Islam, M., & Das, S. (2020). Understanding the determinants of online pharmacy adoption: A two-staged SEM–neural network analysis approach. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 12(4), 666–687. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-07-2020-0108
  37. Saride, A. K., & Sharad, M. (2024). Augmentation of farmers’ income through non-pesticidal management (NPM) input production: An economic analysis. In Proceedings of the 2024 9th International Conference on Energy Efficiency and Agricultural Engineering (EEAE). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EEAE60309.2024.10600518
  38. Shanmuka, A., Kumbhare, N. V., Nain, M. S., Muralikrishnan, L., Sinha, K., Prasad, S., Kumar, P., & Meena, S. L. (2025). Economics of chemical and natural farming with and without cattle integration in rice-jowar cropping system. Journal of Community Mobilization and Sustainable Development, 20(1), 136–142. https://doi.org/10.5958/2231-6736.2025.00021.4
  39. Sharma, A., Mohan, A., Johri, A., & Asif, M. (2024). Determinants of fintech adoption in agrarian economy: Study of UTAUT extension model in reference to developing economies. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(2), 100273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100273
  40. Shi, Y., Siddik, A. B., Masukujjaman, M., Zheng, G., Hamayun, M., & Ibrahim, A. M. (2022). The antecedents of willingness to adopt and pay for the IoT in the agricultural industry: An application of the UTAUT 2 theory. Sustainability, 14(11), 6640. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116640
  41. Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322–2347. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189
  42. Singh, S., Kumar, S., Doharey, R. K., Singh, S., & Sahoo, S. (2026). Understanding entrepreneurial behaviour of rural youth in agriculture and allied sectors. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 62(2), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2026.62202
  43. Sonu, K., & Jha, K. K. (2025). Understanding entrepreneurial behaviour of Makhana growers in Bihar using SEM-PLS approach. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 61(2), 62–66. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2025.61212
  44. Soomro, R. B., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Dahri, N. A., Almuqren, L., Almogren, A. S., & Aldaijy, A. (2025). A SEM–ANN analysis to examine impact of artificial intelligence technologies on sustainable performance of SMEs. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 5438. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86464-3
  45. Timilsina, R. R., Khosla, S., Rahut, D. B., Jena, P. R., & Sonobe, T. (2025). A comprehensive review of the soil health status for enhancing agricultural sustainability. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 13, 1548095. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1548095
  46. Upadhyay, C. K., & Kaur, S. (2026). Trust and risk for technology adoption: Extending UTAUT for digital crowd farming in rural India. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-10-2025-0486
  47. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  48. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
  49. Wang, H., Qi, W., & Guo, W. (2026). Does ICT adoption influence agricultural efficiency of Chinese farmers? Mechanism analysis based on agricultural insurance and credit. Digital Economy and Sustainable Development, 4(1), 1.
  50. Yang, Q., Al Mamun, A., Naznen, F., & Masud, M. M. (2024). Adoption of conservative agricultural practices among rural Chinese farmers. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 450. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02956-z
  51. Yu, Z., Zhao, Y., Shi, G., & Yu, X. (2026). Structured neural network model reveals how resettler perceptions influence agricultural effectiveness. Discover Agriculture, 4(1), 134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-026-00605-4
  52. Yuan, Y. P., Tan, G. W. H., & Ooi, K. B. (2024). Does COVID-19 pandemic motivate privacy self-disclosure in mobile fintech transactions? A privacy-calculus-based dual-stage SEM-ANN analysis. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 2986–3000. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2022.3204285
  53. Zeng, Y., Cao, S., & Li, L. (2016). Exploring the factors affecting consumers’ online agricultural products purchase behavior based on the UTAUT model. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Business (ICEB 2016). https://aisel.aisnet.org/iceb2016/73
  54. Zhou, W., Li, M., & Achal, V. (2025). A comprehensive review on environmental and human health impacts of chemical pesticide usage. Emerging Contaminants, 11(1), 100410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emcon.2024.100410

Looking up citing articles…