Skip to content
Home▶ Journals▶ Indian Journal of Extension Education▶Archive▶Vol. 62 No. 2 (2026)▶Post-Adoption Satisfaction and Policy Demand Paradox among…
Indian Journal of Extension Education
Research Article

Post-Adoption Satisfaction and Policy Demand Paradox among Household Solar Users in Ladakh

, , , ,
Immad A Shah — Assistant Professor/Junior Scientist, Division of Agricultural Statistics, SKUAST-K, Shalimar, Srinagar, J&K, India
Irshad Ahmad Para — Research Assistant, ICSSR-Solar Project, Division of Agricultural Statistics, SKUAST-K, Shalimar, Srinagar, J&K, India
Rafia N Zargar — Research Assistant, ICSSR-Solar Project, Division of Agricultural Statistics, SKUAST-K, Shalimar, Srinagar, J&K, India
Ishtiyaq Bashir — Field Investigator, ICSSR-Solar Project, Division of Agricultural Statistics, SKUAST-K, Shalimar, Srinagar, J&K, India
Quadri Javeed Ahmad Peer — Assistant Professor, Division of Agricultural Extension and Communication, SKUAST-K, Shalimar, Srinagar, J&K, India
Published 18 Mar 2026 Vol. 62 No. 2 (2026), pp. 39-46 ● Open access
Formats:PDF ● Open access
Download PDF

Abstract

The study aimed to identify factors that influence satisfaction after-adoption and explain why households continue to request government support despite owning functional solar systems. Using a quantitative cross-sectional design, primary data were collected in 2025 from 440 selected solar-adopting households in Ladakh through a primary field study. A structured questionnaire captured demographic, financial, attitudinal, technical, and environmental variables. The analysis employed Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to extract latent constructs, logistic regression to determine predictors of policy demand, and K-means clustering to segment adopters into behavioural groups. The results showed that financially stable and highly satisfied households unexpectedly exhibit the strongest demand for continued subsidies, while financially constrained users report lower satisfaction but have limited policy influence. Three clusters emerged: Happy Rent-Seekers, Contented Independents, and Struggling Dissatisfied, revealing subsidy capture by wealthier users. The study concluded that universal subsidies contribute to inequitable resource distribution and recommends shifting toward targeted, performance-based support, enhanced maintenance services, and improved post-adoption monitoring. This research contributed novel empirical evidence on post-adoption dynamics in high-altitude regions, highlighting the need for policy frameworks that align financial support with household needs.
KeywordsSolar energy adoption, Post adoption satisfaction, Principal component analysis, K-means cluster analysis.

The full text of this article is available as a PDF.

Download PDF
  1. Ahmed, Y. A., Rashid, A., & Khurshid, M. M. (2022). Investigating the determinants of the adoption of solar photovoltaic systems: Citizens’ perspectives of two developing countries. Sustainability, 14(18), 11764. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811764
  2. Ahmed, Y., Ebrahim, S., & Ahmed, M. (2022). Determinants of solar technology adoption in rural households: The case of Belesa districts, Amhara region of Ethiopia. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 2087644. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2087644
  3. Al-Mohamad, A. (2004). Efficiency improvements of photovoltaic panels using a sun-tracking system. Applied Energy, 79(3), 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2003.12.004
  4. Chandel, S. S., Shrivastva, R., Sharma, V., & Ramasamy, P. (2016). Overview of the initiatives in renewable energy sector under the national action plan on climate change in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 866–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.057
  5. Dhami, M. K., Mandel, D. R., & Sothmann, K. (2007). An evaluation of post-adoption services. Children and Youth Services Review, 29(2), 162–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2006.06.003
  6. El-Afifi, M. I. (2024). Solar energy: Our future for sustainable energy. Nile Journal of Communication and Computer Science, 7(1), 67–83.
  7. Elum, Z. A., & Momodu, A. S. (2017). Climate change mitigation and renewable energy for sustainable development in Nigeria: A discourse approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76, 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.040
  8. Etongo, D., & Naidu, H. (2022). Determinants of household adoption of solar energy technology in Seychelles in a context of 100% access to electricity. Discover Sustainability, 3(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-022-00108-4
  9. Famili, A., Shen, W. M., Weber, R., & Simoudis, E. (1997). Data preprocessing and intelligent data analysis. Intelligent Data Analysis, 1(1–4), 3–23.
  10. Gupta, S., Sharma, K. C., Badhala, B. S., & Sharma, R. N. (2022). Knowledge and association of solar pump users regarding vegetable production technology in Jaipur, Rajasthan. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 58(3), 29–32.
  11. Haq, I., Khan, M., Chakma, S., Hossain, M. I., Sarkar, S., Rejvi, M. R. A., & Sarker, M. M. R. (2024). Determinants of household adoption of clean energy with its rural–urban disparities in Bangladesh. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 2356. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52798-7
  12. Hemalatha, M., & Senthil Nayaki, S. (2014). K-means clustering for profiling rural women entrepreneurs in India. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 17(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2014.064114
  13. Hosseini, S. E., & Wahid, M. A. (2020). Hydrogen from solar energy: A clean energy carrier from a sustainable source of energy. International Journal of Energy Research, 44(6), 4110–4131. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.4930
  14. Jatav, S. S. (2024). Factors affecting adoption of climate-smart agriculture practices: Evidence from Uttar Pradesh, India. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 60(2), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2024.60205
  15. Joshi, N., & Kothari, A. (2025). Autonomy and pluriversal energy futures in Ladakh, India. Human Geography, 18(2), 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/19427786241303762
  16. Khalkho, R., Mondal, S., Haque, M., & Acharya, S. K. (2023). Factors driving jute to maize shift in Uttar Dinajpur, West Bengal. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 59(4), 125–129. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2023.59425
  17. Khare, V., Nema, S., & Baredar, P. (2013). Status of solar wind renewable energy in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 27, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.06.018
  18. Kumar, S., & Rathore, K. (2023). Renewable energy for sustainable development goal of clean and affordable energy. International Journal of Materials Manufacturing and Sustainable Technologies, 2(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.56896/IJMMST.2023.2.1.001
  19. Lahmouri, M., Drewes, J. E., & Gondhalekar, D. (2019). Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions in centralized and decentralized water reclamation with resource recovery strategies in Leh Town, Ladakh, India. Water, 11(5), 906. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11050906
  20. Merlino, V. M., Renna, M., Nery, J., Muresu, A., Ricci, A., Maggiolino, A., & Tarantola, M. (2022). Are local dairy products better? Using principal component analysis to investigate consumers’ perception towards quality, sustainability, and market availability. Animals, 12(11), 1421. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12111421
  21. Najam, A., & Cleveland, C. J. (2003). Energy and sustainable development at global environmental summits: An evolving agenda. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 5(1), 117–121.
  22. Namgyal, P., & Sarkar, S. (2025a). Comparative livelihood vulnerability assessment of villages to climate change in high-altitude cold desert, Ladakh, India. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27(3), 7949–7971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04232-7
  23. Namgyal, P., & Sarkar, S. (2025b). Spatial and temporal analysis of climatic parameters in the cold arid Trans-Himalayan region of Ladakh, India. Acta Geophysica.
  24. Ofetotse, E. L., Essah, E. A., & Yao, R. (2021). Evaluating the determinants of household electricity consumption using cluster analysis. Journal of Building Engineering, 43, 102487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102487
  25. Penner, J. (2024). Post-adoption service provision: A scoping review. Adoption Quarterly, 27(4), 319–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2023.2176957
  26. Pundir, S., Padaria, R. N., Muralikrishnan, L., Aiswarya, S., Mukherjee, S., Shravani, K., & Ghosh, B. (2025). Cluster analysis-based discernment of farmers’ typologies and climate change adaptation strategies among rural women. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 61(1), 78–82. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2025.61114
  27. Singh, S. P., Singh, R. D., & Rawal, R. S. (2023). Development of Ladakh: The issue of integrating a renewable energy and tourism-based economy with pastoralism and ecology. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 49(4), 341–351.
  28. Upreti, P., Singh, D. R., Kumar, N. R., Venkatesh, P., Nain, M. S., Jha, G. K., & Kumar, S. (2023). Feasibility analysis of solar-powered tubewells in arid and sub-humid regions of Rajasthan. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 59(3), 126–131. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2024.59324
  29. Yadav, B., Maurya, A. S., Supriya, N. S., & Kumar, A. (2026). Socio-economic determinants of agricultural households in Punjab: A principal component analysis. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 62(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2026.62107
  30. Yang, S., & Zhao, D. (2015). Do subsidies work better in low-income than in high-income families? Survey on domestic energy-efficient and renewable energy equipment purchase in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 841–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.022
  31. Zegeye, A. A., Masresha, D. A., Tefera, S. A., Admas, B. E., Awoke, D. A., Kebede, G. M., & Mekonnen, B. A. (2025). Adoption of solar energy technology among households: Evidence from Ethiopia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 521, 146287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146287

Looking up citing articles…