Skip to content
Home▶ Journals▶ Indian Journal of Extension Education▶Archive▶Vol. 62 No. 2 (2026)▶Selective Complementarity of Indigenous Leadership: Ninik…
Indian Journal of Extension Education
Research Article

Selective Complementarity of Indigenous Leadership: Ninik Mamak’s Role in Livestock Development in Minangkabau, Indonesia

, ,
Riza Andesca Putra — Doctoral Program in Extension and Development Communication, Graduate School, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Sunarru Samsi Hariadi — Doctoral Program in Extension and Development Communication, Graduate School, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Mujtahidah Anggriani Ummul Muzayyanah — Doctoral Program in Extension and Development Communication, Graduate School, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Published 18 Mar 2026 Vol. 62 No. 2 (2026), pp. 20-25 ● Open access
Formats:PDF ● Open access
Download PDF

Abstract

Indigenous leadership plays an important role in rural development, but Ninik Mamak’s specific contribution as an indigenous leader of the Minangkabau people to livestock development has not been empirically documented. Present research analyzes the influence of Ninik Mamak’s role on livestock development from technical, social, and economic aspects. A quantitative method was used in this study to collect data from 210 respondents from 42 livestock groups in West Sumatra Province. A validated and reliable Likert-scale questionnaire was employed for data collection, and multiple linear regression was used for data analysis. The results show that all regression models are statistically significant. Ninik Mamak’s decision-making role shows a strong positive effect on all aspects. However, the role of information dissemination does not show a significant impact, whereas the role of cooperation facilitation has significant negative effects on the technical and economic aspects. This study confirms that Ninik Mamak has a significant role in the development of farms with complex patterns. These findings introduce the concept of “selective complementarity” in institutional theory and recommend selective engagement strategies to optimize the role of indigenous leadership.
KeywordsInformal institutions, Social capital, Institutional theory, Livestock groups, Matrilineal system.

The full text of this article is available as a PDF.

Download PDF
  1. Adisa, R. S. (2015). Livestock extension practice and competency among agricultural extension agents in north-central Nigeria. South African Journal of Agricultural Extension, 43(1), 12–21.
  2. Ahmad, K. B., & Zulfidar, F. (2023). Understanding the concept of merantau, tau jo nan ampek, and ninik mamak in Minangkabau culture in West Sumatra, Indonesia. Asian Journal of Arts and Culture, 23(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.48048/ajac.2023.256669
  3. Anas, A., Ediset, E., & Alianta, A. A. (2024). Evaluation of government grant program (Case study: “Dana Pokok Pikiran (POKIR)” or principal grant by legislator in farmers groups in Padang City, West Sumatra, Indonesia). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1292(1), 012028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1292/1/012028
  4. Azwar, S. (2015). Fundamentals of psychometrics (2nd ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.
  5. Azwar, W., Yunus, Y., Muliono, M., & Permatasari, Y. (2018). Nagari Minangkabau: The study of indigenous institutions in West Sumatra, Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 10(2), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.10.2018.231-239
  6. Banda, L. J., & Tanganyika, J. (2021). Livestock provide more than food in smallholder production systems of developing countries. Animal Frontiers, 11(2), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfab001
  7. Bansal, S., Sarker, T., Yadav, A., Garg, I., Gupta, M., & Sarvaiya, H. (2024). Indigenous communities and sustainable development: A review and research agenda. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 43(4), 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22237
  8. Beaman, L., BenYishay, A., Magruder, J., & Mobarak, A. M. (2021). Can network theory-based targeting increase technology adoption? American Economic Review, 111(6), 1918–1943. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20200295
  9. Bujang, M. A., Omar, E. D., & Baharum, N. A. (2018). A review on sample size determination for Cronbach’s alpha test: A simple guide for researchers. Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences, 25(6), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2018.25.6.9
  10. Chili, N. S., & Ngxongo, N. A. (2017). The role of community leadership in fostering an agenda of active community participation in rural regional tourism development: Perspectives from Umhlwazini. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 6(4).
  11. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
  12. Curry, G. N., Nake, S., Koczberski, G., Oswald, M., Rafflegeau, S., Lummani, J., Peter, E., & Nailina, R. (2021). Disruptive innovation in agriculture: Socio-cultural factors in technology adoption in the developing world. Journal of Rural Studies, 88, 422–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.07.022
  13. Dau, L. A., Li, J., Lyles, M. A., & Chacar, A. S. (2022). Informal institutions and the international strategy of MNEs: Effects of institutional effectiveness, convergence, and distance. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(6), 1257–1281. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-022-00543-5
  14. Dewi, S. F., Syafril, R., Hasmira, M. H., Bakhtiar, Y., Salleh, K. M., Yulika, F., Evelynd, E., & Sulaiman, N. L. (2024). Strengthening social cohesion through the Manyanda tradition in Minangkabau customary society: A cultural insight from West Sumatra, Indonesia. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(13), Article 13. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd9344
  15. Elfia, E., Shalihin, N., Surwati, S., Fajri, Y., & Rahmat, A. (2024). Institutionalizing maqasid hifz al-nasl within the Minangkabau inheritance framework. Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v24i2.193-222
  16. Hakim, L., Hadi, R. T., & Ahmad. (2025). Minangkabau leadership philosophy: Synthesizing religion, adat, and intellectuals in the history of Islamic political thought. Miqot: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 49(1), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v49i1.1357
  17. Hariadi, S. S. (2011). Group dynamics: Theory and application for analyzing the success of farmer groups as units of learning, cooperation, production, and business. Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Gadjah Mada.
  18. Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4), 725–740. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592704040472
  19. Herrero, M., Grace, D., Njuki, J., Johnson, N., Enahoro, D., Silvestri, S., & Rufino, M. C. (2013). The roles of livestock in developing countries. Animal, 7(S1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112001954
  20. Indrayani, I., Andri, A., & Boyon, B. (2022). Analysis of the role of beef cattle in the economic development of the livestock sub-sector in West Sumatra Province. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jepa.2022.006.04.18
  21. Jatav, S. S. (2024). Livelihood diversification and rural household economic security in Uttar Pradesh, India. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 60(3), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2024.60302
  22. Kiptot, E., & Franzel, S. (2014). Voluntarism as an investment in human, social, and financial capital: Evidence from a farmer-to-farmer extension program in Kenya. Agriculture and Human Values, 31(2), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-013-9463-5
  23. Liu, P., Han, A., & Yuan, Y. (2025). Community leadership and its contribution to rural revitalization under the context of population hollowing-out: Evidence from Shanghai, China. Population, Space and Place, 31(1), e2880. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2880
  24. Madarisa, F., Putra, R. A., & Novarista, N. (2024). The influence of the performance of livestock farming groups on the development of government-assisted livestock populations in Lima Puluh Kota District. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1341(1), 012103. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1341/1/012103
  25. Makate, C. (2020). Local institutions and indigenous knowledge in adoption and scaling of climate-smart agricultural innovations among sub-Saharan smallholder farmers. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 12(2), 270–287. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-07-2018-0055
  26. Matsiliza, N. S. (2024). The strategic role of traditional leadership in promoting good governance. Africa’s Public Service Delivery & Performance Review, 12(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.4102/apsdpr.v12i1.825
  27. Mbalyohere, C., & Lawton, T. C. (2022). Engaging informal institutions through corporate political activity: Capabilities for subnational embeddedness in emerging economies. International Business Review, 31(2), 101927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101927
  28. Olaopa, O. R., & Ogundare, S. (2023). Traditional leadership, indigenous knowledge, and local governance: Implications for good governance and sustainable development agenda. In Indigenous people—Traditional practices and modern development. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1003144
  29. Pali, P. N., Tebeka, Y. A., Schut, M., Mangheni, M. N., Wairegi, L. W., Manyong, V. M., & van Asten, P. J. A. (2023). Elaborating institutional arrangements to better enhance sustainable crop intensification in Uganda: A farmers’ perspective. Journal of Rural Studies, 98, 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.02.002
  30. Putra, R. A., Novarista, N., Anas, A., & Madarisa, F. (2023). Identification of capacity grade improvement of livestock farmer groups receiving government assistance in Padang Pariaman District, West Sumatera. Jurnal Peternakan Indonesia, 25(2), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.25077/jpi.25.2.136-149.2023
  31. Rahmat, A., Warassih, E., & Syamsudin, M. (2023). The existence of Nagari in West Sumatra on state policy hegemony. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 11(2), 310–329. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol11no2.452
  32. Salkind, N. (2007). Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412952644
  33. Sharma, S., & Singh, R. (2023). Knowledge enhancement of landless and marginal farmers through entrepreneurship training on goat farming. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 59(4), 58–61. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2023.59412
  34. Verma, H., Singh, M., Shruti, & Meena, H. R. (2025). Farmers’ livelihood security through sheep farming in Bareilly District of Uttar Pradesh. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 61(4), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2025.61406
  35. Webster, J. (2013). Animal husbandry regained: The place of farm animals in sustainable agriculture. Routledge.
  36. Widianingsih, I., McIntyre, J. J., Rakasiwi, U. S., Iskandar, G. H., & Wirawan, R. (2023). Indigenous Sundanese leadership: Ecosystemic lessons on zero emissions. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 36(2), 321–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-022-09606-y
  37. Yami, M., & van Asten, P. (2018). Relevance of informal institutions for achieving sustainable crop intensification in Uganda. Food Security, 10(1), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-017-0754-3
  38. Yang, Y., Huang, Y., Huang, J., & Nie, F. (2024). The role of social capital in the impact of multiple shocks on households’ coping strategies in underdeveloped rural areas. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 14218. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65206-x
  39. Zhou, T. M. (2023). The role of traditional leaders and culture in Zimbabwean elections. In E. Mavengano & S. Chirongoma (Eds.), Electoral politics in Zimbabwe, Vol. II: The 2023 election and beyond (pp. 331–350). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33796-3_18

Looking up citing articles…