Skip to content
Home▶ Journals▶ Indian Journal of Extension Education▶Archive▶Vol. 62 No. 1 (2026)▶Advancing Digital Extension Education: Development and…
Indian Journal of Extension Education
Research Tool

Advancing Digital Extension Education: Development and Validation of Digital Learning Engagement Scale

,
Yamini Pakala — Research Scholar, Department of Management Studies, National Institute of Technology, Warangal, Telangana, India
Sunitha Guniganti — Associate Professor, Department of Management Studies, National Institute of Technology, Warangal, Telangana, India
Published 29 Dec 2025 Vol. 62 No. 1 (2026), pp. 159-165 ● Open access
Formats:PDF ● Open access
Download PDF

Abstract

Digital transformation has revolutionized extension education and professional upskilling, revealing significant gaps in learning engagement assessment within digital contexts. Conventional classroom-based scales fail to capture multifaceted digital engagement in AI-augmented, asynchronous environments, overlooking self-regulation difficulties, learner isolation, and adaptive interactions. This hampers organizations and extension practitioners from identifying disengagement early and designing evidence-based interventions. Addressing this, an 18-item Digital Learning Engagement Scale (DLES) was developed through robust psychometric evaluation, content validation by eight experts. Data was collected from 461 digital learning platform users. Exploratory factor analysis (n=227) using principal axis factoring is chosen to handle correlated engagement dimensions, identified a stable four-factor structure (behavioural, emotional, cognitive and psychological engagement) explaining 66.93 per cent of variance (KMO=0.937, Bartlett’s p < 0.001). Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed excellent model fit (χ²//df = 1.34, CFI = 0.945, TLI = 0.935, RMSEA = 0.065, SRMR = 0.057) with strong internal consistency (α = 0.86 -0.91), composite reliability (CR = 0.87- 0.91), convergent and discriminant validity. The DLES enables extension professionals, educators, and organizations to assess engagement, identify barriers, and implement targeted data-driven interventions, improving retention and learning effectiveness.

KeywordsDigital learning engagementScale developmentBehavioural engagementCognitive engagementEmotional engagementPsychological engagementDigital extension education

The full text of this article is available as a PDF.

Download PDF
  1. Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002
  2. Chakraborty, J., Das, R., & Jha, K. K. (2025). The role of cognitive style in academic achievements and creative thinking among students. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 61(3), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2025.61313
  3. Cotton, R., Johnson, M., Hanks, J., & McGill, D. (2025). Is a virtual learning environment effective for mid-career agricultural extensionists’ cross-cultural learning? The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2025.2513265
  4. Deng, R., Benckendorff, P., & Gannaway, D. (2020). Learner engagement in MOOCs: Scale development and validation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12810
  5. Du Plooy, E., Casteleijn, D., & Franzsen, D. (2024). Personalized adaptive learning in higher education: A scoping review of key characteristics and impact on academic performance and engagement. Heliyon, 10(21), e39630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39630
  6. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
  7. Feroz, H. M. B., Zulfiqar, S., Noor, S., & Huo, C. (2022). Examining multiple engagements and their impact on students’ knowledge acquisition: The moderating role of information overload. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(1), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-11-2020-0422
  8. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3516061
  9. Gao, T., Lu, Q., Feng, H., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Does farmers’ cognition enhance their enthusiasm for adopting sustainable digital agricultural extension services? Evidence from rural China. Sustainability, 16(10), 3972. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16103972
  10. Greenhow, C., Graham, C. R., & Koehler, M. J. (2022). Foundations of online learning: Challenges and opportunities. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2090364
  11. Gupta, R. M., & Anusha. (2020). Determinants of successful integration of e-learning into higher education. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 56(4), 37–42.
  12. Gupta, R., & Vatta, L. (2025). Disruptions in lifestyle due to escalating screen time: A behavioural perspective. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 61(4), 14–18. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2025.61403
  13. Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2019). Learner engagement in blended learning environments: A conceptual framework. Online Learning, 23(2), 145–178. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1450
  14. Haqyar, Z., Rohila, A. K., Malik, J. S., & Kumar, A. (2025). Usage pattern of information and communication technology tools among university faculty members. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 61(1), 108–112. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2025.611RN03
  15. Kahu, E. R., Nelson, K., & Picton, C. (2018). The development and validation of the Higher Education Student Engagement Scale (HESES). Review of Higher Education, 41(3), 413–435. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2018.0011
  16. Malavika, G., Shamsa, F., Allan, A. T., Thara, S., Meethal, S. V. K., Sownthariya, S., & Thomas, A. (2025). Time management and procrastination patterns among undergraduate agriculture students. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 61(4), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2025.61421
  17. National Institute of Agricultural Extension Management. (2024). Extension MOOCs: Online platform for extension functionaries. https://www.manage.gov.in/moodleafa/
  18. Parekkadan House, P. J. S., & Roy, D. (2025). Attainment of student engagement in secondary schools in Kerala: An empirical investigation. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 61(2), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2025.61202
  19. Roy, S., Mukherjee, S., B. M., Y., Singh, G., Kalaiselvi, P., Raj, R., Balo, S., & Diwakar, N. (2025). From field to future: The evolution of agricultural extension in the digital age for sustainable and revitalized rural economies. International Journal of Agriculture Extension and Social Development, 8(11), 530–540.
  20. Wong, Z. Y., & Liem, G. A. D. (2022). Student engagement: Current state of the construct, conceptual refinement, and future research directions. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 107–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09628-3
  21. Xue, Y., Khalid, F., & Karim, A. A. (2025). Cognitive and behavioural engagement challenges in open and distance learning and potential solutions from artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1610148. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1610148

Looking up citing articles…