Skip to content
Home▶ Journals▶ Indian Journal of Extension Education▶Archive▶Vol. 61 No. 4 (2025)▶Modeling of Farmers’ Preferences towards Climate-Smart…
Indian Journal of Extension Education
Indian Journal of Extension Education ›
Online ISSN 2454-552X
Submit your paper About the journal
Research Article

Modeling of Farmers’ Preferences towards Climate-Smart Agriculture Using Conjoint Analysis

, , , ,
Bhartendu Yadav — Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara-144411, Punjab, India
Bhavesh — Ph.D. Scholar, Western Sydney University, Australia
Abhilash Singh Maurya — Subject Matter Specialist (Agricultural Extension), Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Raebareli-II (Palti Khera), Uttar Pradesh, India
Sarju Narain — Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension, BNPG College, Rath, Hamirpur-210431, Uttar Pradesh, India
Joginder Singh Malik — Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension Education, CCS HAU, Hisar-125004, Haryana, India
Published 3 Oct 2025 Vol. 61 No. 4 (2025), pp. 106-111 ● Open access
❝ How to cite 🔗 https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2025.61418
Formats:PDF ● Open access
Download PDF

Abstract

Climate change poses a significant threat to agricultural productivity, particularly for smallholder farmers in India. The study utilized a mixed-method approach, which involved 150 farmers and expert consultations from Punjab and Uttar Pradesh states related to the domain in the year 2024-25. Farmers’ preferences were studied using CSA attributes: productivity, adaptation, and mitigation, deploying the conjoint analysis. It was found that the farmers are continuously affected by the dynamic weather conditions, causing irregular rainfall to impact crop health and eventually crop yield. Although awareness related to CSA was present but its adoption was very low due to the absence of infrastructure and technology. A gap was found between the recommendation of the experts related to integrated and efficient nutrient management and the farmers’ adoption level. As a result of the conjoint analysis, it was found that the adaptation attribute was highly favoured by the farmers, followed by the other two, i.e., mitigation and productivity. The reliability of the model was supported by Pearson’s R (0.934) and Kendall’s tau (0.856), which revealed a strong connection between the prediction and the actual preferences. 

 

KeywordsConjoint analysisFarmer’s preferencesClimate smart agriculture (CSA)AdaptationSustainable agriculture.

The full text of this article is available as a PDF.

Download PDF
  1. Andati, P., Majiwa, E., Ngigi, M., Mbeche, R., & Ateka, J. (2023). Effect of climate-smart agriculture technologies on crop yields: Evidence from potato production in Kenya. Climate Risk Management, 41, 100539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2023.100539
  2. Asenahabi, B. M., & Ikoha, P. A. (2023). Scientific research sample size determination. The International Journal of Science & Technoledge, 7(11). https://www.internationaljournalcorner.com/index.php/theijst/article/view/173085
  3. Ashoka, N., Harshavardhan, M., Hongal, S., Meti, S., Raju, R., Patil, G. I., & Shashidhara, N. (2022). Farmers’ acuity on climate change in the central dry zone of Karnataka. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 58(3), 136–141. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJEE/article/view/125123
  4. Bhatnagar, S., Chaudhary, R., Sharma, S., Janjhua, Y., Thakur, P., Sharma, P., & Keprate, A. (2024). Exploring the dynamics of climate-smart agricultural practices for sustainable resilience in a changing climate. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 24, 100535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2024.100535
  5. Das, S., & Paul, S. (2021). An assessment of cultivators’ perception about climate change and its-induced adaptation practices in agriculture of Cooch Behar Sadar sub-division, West Bengal, India. Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 9(2), 271–279. https://pubs.sciepub.com/aees/9/2/19/index.html
  6. Djufry, F., Wulandari, S., & Villano, R. (2022). Climate smart agriculture implementation on coffee smallholders in Indonesia and strategy to accelerate. Land, 11(7), 1112. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/7/1112
  7. Mahto, R. K., Sharma, D., John, R., & Putcha, C. (2021). Agrivoltaics: A climate-smart agriculture approach for Indian farmers. Land, 10(11), 1277. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/11/1277
  8. Malarkodi, M., Kanaka, S., Premavathi, P., Tamilselvi, C., Agila, R., & Sridhar, P. (2023). Cultivating adaptation: A study of FPO farmer preferences for climate-smart training in the western zone of Tamil Nadu, India. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, 41(12), 246–252. https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/article/view/2325
  9. Meena, D. C., Kumari, M., Kishore, P., & Bangararaju, S. V. (2023). Do socio-economic conditions and personal behaviour influence the adoption of climate change mitigating measures? Indian Journal of Extension Education, 59(2), 22–25. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJEE/article/view/132323
  10. Mo, T., Lee, H., Oh, S., Lee, H., & Kim, B. H. S. (2023). Economic efficiency of climate smart agriculture technology: Case of agrophotovoltaics. Land, 12(1), 90. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/90
  11. Mosso, C., Pons, D., & Beza-Beza, C. (2022). A long way towards climate smart agriculture: The importance of addressing gender inequity in the agricultural sector of Guatemala. Land, 11(8), 1268. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/8/1268
  12. Ndue, K., & Pal, G. (2022). Life cycle assessment perspective for sectoral adaptation to climate change: Environmental impact assessment of pig production. Land, 11(6), 827. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/6/827
  13. Raghuvashi, R., & Ansari, M. A. (2020). Farmers’ vulnerability to climate change: A study in the north Himalayan region of Uttarakhand, India. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 56(4), 1–8. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJEE/article/view/108399
  14. Rampa, A., Gadanakis, Y., & Rose, G. (2020). Land reform in the era of global warming: Can land reforms help agriculture be climate-smart? Land, 9, 471. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/12/471
  15. Ravindera, R., & Singh, A. (2019). Farmers’ perception and adoption of abiotic stress tolerant rice varieties in rain-fed lowlands of north-eastern Uttar Pradesh. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 55(4), 19–24. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJEE/article/view/108015
  16. Sarker, J. R., Roy, S. S., & Roy, M. (2025). Evaluating agricultural decision-making: A systematic review of discrete choice experiments and producers’ preferences. World Development Sustainability, 7, 100231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2025.100231
  17. Shanabhoga, M. B., Bommaiah, K., Suresh, S. V., Dechamma, S., & Kumar, R. V. (2023). Climate change adaptation constraints among paddy growing farmers in Kalyana-Karnataka region of Karnataka state. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 59(2), 124–127. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJEE/article/view/132326
  18. Sharma, K., Dhaliwal, N. S., & Bishnoi, C. (2021). Adoption status of improved crop production practices in Bt-cotton in Sri Muktsar Sahib, Punjab. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 57(2), 63–68. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJEE/article/view/111677
  19. Shitu, A. G., & Nain, M. S. (2024). Benefits of precision conservation agriculture practices as perceived by Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP) community for climate-smart agriculture. SKUAST Journal of Research, 26(2), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.5958/2349-297X.2024.00029.2
  20. Sodhi, G. P. S., Singh, R. K., Dhillon, G. S., Ahuja, S., Kaur, A., Sunidhi, K., Kaur, T., Murai, A. S., Singh, R., & Kaur, S. (2023). Adoption behaviour of climate-resilient agricultural practices in Punjab under the NICRA project. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 59(2), 46–50. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJEE/article/view/134044
  21. Vatsa, P., Ma, W., Zheng, H., & Li, J. (2023). Climate-smart agricultural practices for promoting sustainable agrifood production: Yield impacts and implications for food security. Food Policy, 121, 102551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102551

Looking up citing articles…

    Creative Commons License

    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.