Incorporating gender dimensions in the multi-criteria management of Homestead Agroforestry in the Kashmir Himalayas, India

Authors

  • Saika Manzoor Division of Silviculture and Agroforestry, Faculty of Forestry, SKUAST-K
  • Aafaq A. Parrey Iqbal Jeelani Division of Agri-Stat, Faculty of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry, SKUAST-K
  • N A Pala Division of Silviculture and Agroforestry, Faculty of Forestry, SKUAST-K
  • Mansha Manzoor Division of Silviculture and Agroforestry, Faculty of Forestry, SKUAST-K
  • Vaishnu Dutt Division of Silviculture and Agroforestry, Faculty of Forestry, SKUAST-K
  • J I Mir ICAR-Central Institute of Temperate Horticulture, Srinagar
  • M Maqbool Rather Division of Forest Biology and Tree Improvement, Faculty of Forestry, SKUAST
  • G M Bhat Division of Silviculture and Agroforestry, Faculty of Forestry, SKUAST-K
  • Megna Rashid Division of Silviculture and Agroforestry, Faculty of Forestry, SKUAST-K
  • Sufiya Shabir Division of Silviculture and Agroforestry, Faculty of Forestry, SKUAST-K

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/ija.2026.28.01.10

Keywords:

Women participation, Agroforestry management, Decision-making processes, Rural livelihoods, Gender dynamics, Environmental sustainability

Abstract

Women play a pivotal yet often underrecognized role in sustaining homestead agroforestry systems. Despite their significant contributions, they continue to face systemic barriers, such as wage disparities, limited access to resources, unfavourable working conditions, and the undervaluation of their labour, which is commonly perceived as unskilled and routine. This study aims to integrate gender perspectives into the multi-criteria management of homestead agroforestry in District Anantnag, Jammu & Kashmir. A multi-stage random sampling approach was adopted to select representative villages, blocks, and 171 households (10% sampling intensity). Primary data were gathered through structured, pre- tested interview schedules and non-participant observation, followed by analysis using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results indicated that material benefits of homestead agroforestry, such as fuelwood, food, and fodder, were rated highest by respondents, whereas non-material benefits (environmental and cultural) were considered moderately important. Approximately 70.18% of women independently managed agroforestry activities, and 52.05% were responsible for organising fruit-related inputs. In contrast, male participation in input planning was 29.24%), and joint family involvement was minimal (2.34%). Women performed nearly 70% of operational tasks (weeding, mulching, cleaning, etc.), yet men dominated income-related decision-making (76.02%), with women contributing only 12.28%). Women also exhibited strong leadership in livestock management (91.23%) and household gardening, participating actively in production (67.25%) and harvesting (50.29%). The major constraints identified were small landholdings, long gestation periods, limited technical knowledge, and the complexity of agroforestry systems. Addressing these gender-specific challenges is crucial for enhancing women's agency, ensuring equitable participation, and strengthening the overall sustainability of homestead agroforestry systems in the region.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ankita, S., Kundan, K., Jeeva, J. C., Srivastava, S. K., & Lalatendu, M. (2018). Understanding gender dynamics in fruit cultivation under Indian condition. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7, 1923–1933.

Bargali, K. (2015). Comparative participation of rural women in agroforestry home gardens in Kumaun Himalaya, Uttarakhand, India. Asian Journal of Agriculture Extension and Economics & Sociology, 6, 16–22.

Bijalwan, A., Swamy, S. L., Sharma, C. M., & Tiwari, A. K. (2011). Land-use, biomass and carbon estimation in dry tropical forest of Chhattisgarh region in India using satellite remote sensing and GIS. Journal of Forest Research, 21, 161–170.

Fartyal, S., & Rathore, S. (2013). Vegetable cultivation in Uttarakhand hills: Viewing through a gender lens. Tropical Agriculture Research, 24, 238–248.

Fernandes, E. C. M., & Nair, P. K. R. (1986). An evaluation of the structure and function of some tropical homegardens. Agroforestry Systems, 21, 179–210.

Finerman, R., & Sackett, R. (2003). Using homegardens to decipher health and healing in Andes. Medical Anthropology, 17, 459–482.

Franzel, S., Arimi, H. K., & Murithi, F. M. (2002a). Calliandra calothyrsus: Assessing the early stages of adoption of a fodder shrub in the highlands of central Kenya. In S. Franzel & S. J. Scherr (Eds.), Trees on the farm: Assessing the adoption potential of agroforestry practices in Africa. CAB International.

Franzel, S., Phiri, D., & Kwesiga, F. (2002b). Assessing the adoption potential of improved fallows in eastern Zambia. In S. Franzel & S. J. Scherr (Eds.), Trees on the farm: Assessing the adoption potential of agroforestry. CAB International.

Geberehiwot, M., Elbakidze, M., & Lidestav, G. (2018). Gender relations in changing agroforestry home-gardens in rural Ethiopia. Journal of Rural Studies, 61, 197–205.

Halbrendt, J., Kimura, A. H., Gray, S. A., Radovich, T., Reed, B., & Tamang, B. B. (2014). Implications of conservation agriculture for men's and women's workloads among marginalized farmers in the central middle hills of Nepal. Mountain Research and Development, 34, 214–223.

International Labour Organization. (1998). Women in the informal sector and their access to micro-credit. ILO Employment Sector, Social Finance Unit.

Islam, M. A., Banyal, R., Rai, R., & Singh, P. K. (2012). Determinant factors of agroforestry adoption in North Kashmir. Indian Journal of Social Research, 53, 123–129.

Kareemulla, K., Rizvi, R. H., Yadav, R. S., Munnaram, & Dhyani, S. K. (2009). Agroforestry for rural development—Cooperatives as viable institutions. Agricultural Situation in India, May, 61–67.

Kokate, K. D., & Subrahmanyum, K. V. (2006). Extension strategies for increasing sugarcane production. Asian Journal of Extension Education, 25, 10–14.

Kumar, B. M., & Nair, P. K. R. (2004). The enigma of tropical homegardens. Agroforestry Systems, 6, 135–152.

Lal, R., & Khurana, A. (2011). Gender issues: The role of women in agriculture sector. Zenith International Journal of Business Economics and Management Research, 1, 29–39.

Maarse, L. M. (1995). A gender difference study on the impact of dairy farming in Kiambu, Meru, Migori, Nandi and Vihiga district of Kenya. National Dairy Development Project.

Maharjan, A., Bauer, S., & Knerr, B. (2012). Do rural women who stay behind benefit from male out-migration? A case study in the hills of Nepal. Gender, Technology and Development, 16, 95–123.

Meganathan, K. N., Selvakumar, M., Prabu, S., Sravan Pandian, A. S., & Senthil Kumar, G. (2010). Constraint analysis of tribal livestock farming in Tamil Nadu. Tamil Nadu Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 6, 12–18.

Miah, M. G., & Ahmed, M. M. (2003). Traditional agroforestry in Bangladesh: Livelihood activities of the rural households [Poster presentation]. XII World Forestry Congress, Canada.

Nahar, N. (2008). Relationship of selected characteristics of the farm women with usefulness of agricultural radio program and homestead farming knowledge [Master’s thesis, Bangladesh Agricultural University].

National Sample Survey Office. (2010). Situation assessment survey of farmers. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India.

Nyeko, P., Stewart, J., Franzel, S., & Barkland, P. (2004). Farmers experiences in the management and utilization of Calliandra calothyrsus, a fodder shrub in Uganda. Agricultural Research & Extension Network, AgREN No. 140.

Oluwatayo, I. B. (2012). Gender considerations in decision making in rural Nigeria: Implications on households' food security in Ekiti State; 2008.

Parihaar, R. S., Bargali, K., & Bargali, S. S. (2015). Status of an indigenous agroforestry system: A case study in Kumaun Himalaya, India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 85, 442–447.

Quisumbing, A., & Pandolfelli, L. (2010). Promising approaches to address the needs of poor female farmers: Resources, constraints and interventions. World Development, 38, 581–592.

Raju, V. T., & Rani, S. (1991). Decision-making role of women in agriculture. Indian Journal of Home Science, 20, 13–17.

Raney, T., Anviquez, G., Croppenstedt, A., Gerosa, S., Lowder, S., Matuscke, I., Skoet, J., & Doss, C. (2011). The role of women in agriculture (ESA Working Paper No. 11-02). Agriculture Development Economics Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Raut, P. N. (2006). Production constraints of orange cultivation in Nagpur district of Maharashtra. Asian Journal of Extension Education, 25, 1–4.

Ray, G. L., & Mondol, S. (2011). Research methods in social sciences and extension education. Kalyani Publishers.

Sekhar, C., Selvarajan, M., Pounraj, A., & Prabhadeeswaran, M. (2013). Production and export of mango in India. American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 13, 78–87.

Sharma, S. K. (2009). Development of tree-based agroforestry systems for degraded lands—A review. Range Management and Agroforestry, 30, 98–103.

Singha, A. K., Talukdar, R. K., & Singha, J. K. (2006). Maintenance behaviour of forest resources by the people of forest villagers in Assam. Indian Journal of Forestry, 29, 47–54.

Talukder, A., Khan, T. A., Baker, S. K., Zakaria, A. K. M., Bloem, M. W., & Kiess, L. K. (1997). Home gardening activities in Bangladesh. In S. Satter (Ed.), Mapping report and inventory. Helen Keller International, Incorporated.

Wambugu, C., Franzel, S., Tuwei, P., & Karanja, G. (2001). Scaling up the use of fodder trees in central Kenya. Development in Practice, 11, 487–494.

Published

2026-08-25

How to Cite

Incorporating gender dimensions in the multi-criteria management of Homestead Agroforestry in the Kashmir Himalayas, India. (2026). Indian Journal of Agroforestry, 28(1), 80-87. https://doi.org/10.48165/ija.2026.28.01.10