Economic returns of apricot- and cherry-based agroforestry systems with garlic and onion intercrops in the Kashmir Himalayas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/ija.2026.28.01.09Keywords:
Agroforestry, Fruit trees, Vegetables, Benefit-Cost ratio, Tree-crop interfaceAbstract
Fruit-based agroforestry systems in Kashmir have the potential to improve farm productivity and profitability, yet their performance under different intercrop combinations requires systematic evaluation. The present study was conducted at the experimental field of the Division of Silviculture and Agroforestry, Faculty of Forestry, SKUAST-K, Benhama, Ganderbal, from October 2022 to June 2023. A randomized block design (RBD) was used with three replications and ten treatment combinations involving 3-year-old Apricot (Prunus armeniaca) and Cherry (Prunus avium) plantations. Two intercrops garlic (Allium sativum) and onion (Allium cepa) were grown in different combinations: sole fruit trees, sole intercrops, and integrated tree–crop systems. Growth and yield attributes of garlic and onion, including total biomass, bulb diameter, weight per bulb, and related parameters, were generally higher under sole cropping compared to agroforestry conditions. In contrast, fruit yields of apricot and cherry were higher when both intercrops were grown together, particularly under Apricot + Garlic + Onion (7.57 t ha⁻¹) and Cherry + Garlic + Onion (6.74 t ha⁻¹) treatments. The findings demonstrate that integrating garlic and onion with young apricot and cherry plantations can substantially improve the economic performance of the system. The diversified combinations, particularly Apricot + Garlic + Onion, consistently generated higher returns, indicating that such integrations offer a practical and profitable option for farmers in temperate agroforestry regions.
Downloads
References
Anonymous. (2016). Estimated district wise/kind wise area under major horticulture crops in J&K state for the year 2015–2016. Directorate of Horticulture, Jammu and Kashmir.
Bijalwan, A. (2012). Structure, composition and diversity of horticulture trees and agricultural crops productivity under traditional agri-horticulture system in mid hill station of Garhwal Himalaya, India. American Journal of Plant Science, 3(2), 480–488.
Bhat, G. M., Islam, M. A., Malik, R., & Rather, T. A. (2019). Productivity and economic evaluation of willow (Salix alba L.) based silvopastoral agroforestry system in Kashmir valley. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 11(3), 743–751.
Chauhan, V. K., & Dhiman, R. C. (2002). Evaluation of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under different spacing of poplar (Populus deltoides) in lower western Himalayas. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 72(8), 470–473.
Chadha, K. L. (2003). Handbook of horticulture. Directorate of Information and Publications of Agriculture, Indian Council of Agricultural Research.
Cornell, J. (2014). Agroforestry. Encyclopaedia of Earth.
Dutt, V., & Thakur, P. S. (2020). Bio-economics of cropping systems combining medicinal and aromatic herbs with commercial timber tree species. Indian Journal of Agroforestry, 6(1), 1–7.
Directorate of Horticulture. (2017). Horticulture statistics of Jammu & Kashmir 2016–17. Department of Horticulture, Government of Jammu and Kashmir.
Ferdous, J., Ahamed, T., Miah, M. M. U., & Rahman, M. M. (2022). Performance of radish in aonla-based multistoried agroforestry system. European Journal of Agriculture and Food Science, 4(3), 9–16.
Ghosh, S., Dhyani, S. K., Handa, A. K., & Sharda, V. N. (2020). Agroforestry for resource conservation, livelihood and environmental security in India. Agroforestry Systems, 94, 1–15.
Gomez, K. A., & Gomez, K. A. (1984). Statistical procedures for agricultural research (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Kantaroglu, M., & Demirbas, N. (2020). Technical and economic factors affecting losses in sweet cherry production: A case study from Turkey. International Journal of Fruit Science, 20, 1994–2004.
Kay, S., Graves, A., Palma, J., Moreno, G., Roces-Díaz, J. V., & Aviron, S. (2019). Agroforestry is paying off: Economic evaluation of ecosystem services in European agroforestry systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 275, 100–109.
Kumar, P., Garg, A., & Bhatt, R. K. (2021). Agroforestry: A climate-smart approach for sustainable agriculture in India. Current Science, 121(6), 815–824.
Patil, S. J., Mutanal, S. M., & Patil, H. Y. (2010). Response of summer mungbean to date of sowing and level of fertilizers. Indian Journal of Pulses Research, 16(2), 122–124.
Sayed, M. K. I., Wadud, M. A., Khatun, M. A., Yasmin, R., & Rahman, G. M. M. (2009). Interaction effects of vegetables in association with two years old Hopea odorata sapling. Journal of Agroforestry and Environment, 3(2), 103–106.
Singh, V., Raj, A., Jhariya, M. K., & Thakur, S. (2022). Economic evaluation of agroforestry and non-agroforestry systems in Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Vegetos, 35, 749–758.
Wojtkowski, P. A. (2002). Agroecological perspectives in agronomy, forestry and agroforestry. Science Publishers.
Yadav, P. K. (2003). Effect of nitrogen and potassium on growth and yield of garlic (Allium sativum) in western Rajasthan. Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 32(3–4), 290–291.
Yelenov, J., Omurzakov, A., & Toktoraliev, B. (2019). Productivity of apricot-based agroforestry systems under semi-arid conditions of Kyrgyzstan. Agroforestry Systems, 93, 2147–2157.
Zahoor, S., Dutt, V., Mughal, A. H., Pala, N. A., Qaisar, K. N., & Khan, P. A. (2021). Apple-based agroforestry systems for biomass production and carbon sequestration: Implication for food security and climate change in temperate region of Northern Himalaya, India. Agroforestry Systems, 95, 367–382.
