Dna Profiling: Identification of Corpse in a Distressing Disaster Situation

Authors

  • Anupama Raina Forensic Pathology & Molecular DNA Laboratory, JPNATC, AIIMS, New Delhi.
  • Kamal Chauhan Central Forensic Science Laboratory, New Delhi, India.
  • Braja Kishore Mohapatra Central Forensic Science Laboratory, New Delhi, India.
  • Sindhu Sudha Sahu Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, AIIMS, Bhubaneswar, India.
  • Rajnikanta Swain Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, AIIMS, Bhubaneswar, India.
  • Sudipta Ranjan Singh Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, AIIMS, Bhubaneswar, India.
  • Chittaranjan Behera Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
  • Govinda Balmuchu Forensic Pathology & Molecular DNA Laboratory, JPNATC, AIIMS, New Delhi.
  • Deki Palmo Bodh Forensic Pathology & Molecular DNA Laboratory, JPNATC, AIIMS, New Delhi.
  • Jhansi Lakshmi Mylapalli Forensic Pathology & Molecular DNA Laboratory, JPNATC, AIIMS, New Delhi.
  • Ajay Parkash Forensic Pathology & Molecular DNA Laboratory, JPNATC, AIIMS, New Delhi.
  • Sanjeev Lalwani Forensic Pathology & Molecular DNA Laboratory, JPNATC, AIIMS, New Delhi.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/iijfmt.2026.24.12.07

Keywords:

Disaster management, Forensic DNA identification, train collisions, Sternum bone, teeth

Abstract

Safety measures in Indian railways have improved which has declined the rates of train accidents like collisions and derailment. However, train accident at Bahanga railway station at Balasore occurred on 2nd June 2023 in which around 293 passengers lost their lives and nearly 1200 passengers were injured which has again raised question on railway safety measures. One of the main objectives in such disasters is to identify the victims beside the reason behind the mishap. Forensic DNA analysis plays a key role in identification of mutilated bodies as it provides proficiency in discriminating biological exhibits in forensic situation. As many as 81 deceased could not be identified mainly due to mutilation as many changes were observed in their bodies in due course of time; some were decapitated, while in others only body parts were available. Also, most of these victims were not identified as they were travelling in unreserved compartments where there was no record of passengers available with the Railway Division. Sternum, teeth, scalp hairs and long bones which ever were found suitable for DNA analysis were collected. As these bodies were embalmed with 10% formalin, therefore it was a little challenging to generate DNA profile from all of them. With minor modifications in the protocol, DNA profile was generated successfully from all these 81 unknown bodies (100%) after 8-10 days of accident and compared with the claimants The DNA analysis was carried out for these unidentified bodies using commercially available autosomal STRs and Y-STRs kit. Although all exhibits were challenging but sternum emerged as ideal sample for identification in comparison to teeth and long bones even after exposed to 40% formaldehyde. 53 bodies were handed over to the relatives on the basis of DNA Fingerprinting positive match. Since there were no claimants for rest of the 28 bodies, the last rites for all these were fulfilled after following all legal formalities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hsu, C. M., Huang, N. E., Tsai, L. C., Kao, L. G., Chao, C. H., Linacre, A., & Lee, J. I. (1999). Identification of victims of the 1998 Taoyuan Airbus crash accident using DNA analysis. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 113, 43–46.

Singh, L. (1991). DNA profiling and its applications. Current Science, 60, 580–585.

Cattaneo, C., Ritz-Timme, S., Schutz, H. W., Collins, M., Waite, E., Boormann, H., & Kaatsch, H. J. (2000). Unidentified cadavers and human remains in the EU: An unknown issue. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 113(3), N2–N3.

Chakraborty, R., Stivers, D. N., Su, B., Zhong, Y., & Budowle, B. (1999). The utility of short tandem repeat loci beyond human identification: Implications for development of new DNA typing systems. Electrophoresis, 20(8), 1682–1696.

Olaisen, B., Stenersen, M., & Mevåg, B. (1997). Identification by DNA analysis of the victims of the August 1996 Spitsbergen civil aircraft disaster. Nature Genetics, 15(4), 402–405.

Finaughty, C., Heathfield, L. J., Kemp, V., & Márquez-Grant, N. (2022). Forensic DNA extraction methods for human hard tissue: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of technologies and sample type. Forensic Science International: Genetics. Advance online publication, 102818.

Nandineni, M. R., Prasad, S. P. R., Goud, C. V., Negi, D. S., Nagaraju, J., & Gowrishankar, J. (2010). DNA-based identification of victims of the Mangalore air crash of May 2010. Current Science, 99(3).

Gill, P., Brown, R. M., Fairley, M., Lee, L., Smyth, M., et al. (2008). National recommendations of the Technical UK DNA working group on mixture interpretation for the NDNAD and for court going purposes. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 2, 76–82.

Bright, J. A., Gill, P., & Buckleton, J. (2012). Composite profiles in DNA analysis. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 6, 317–321.

Raimann, P. E., Picanço, J. B., Silva, D. S., Albuquerque, T. C., Paludo, F. J. O., & Alho, C. S. (2012). Procedures to recover DNA from pre-molar and molar teeth of decomposed cadavers with different post-mortem intervals. Archives of Oral Biology, 57(11), 1459–1466.

Miloš, A., Selmanović, A., Smajlović, L., Huel, R. L., Katzmarzyk, C., Rizvić, A., & Parsons, T. J. (2007). Success rates of nuclear short tandem repeat typing from different skeletal elements. Croatian Medical Journal, 48(4), 486–493.

India Today. (2023, March 3). Deadly Greek train crash prompts strike; relatives give DNA. https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/deadly-greek-train-crash-prompts-strike-relatives-give-dna-2341945-2023-03-03

Akhteruzzaman, S., Hasan, M. M., Hossain, T., Mazumder, A. K., & Momtaz, P. (2015). Disaster victim identification by DNA analysis: The Tazreen Fashions garment fire incident experience in Bangladesh. Bioresearch Communications, 1(2), 116–120.

Skinner, M., Alempijevic, D., & Stanojevic, A. (2010). In the absence of dental records, do we need forensic odontologists at mass grave sites? Forensic Science International, 201(1–3), 22–26.

Biesecker, L. G., Bailey-Wilson, J. E., Ballantyne, J., Baum, H., Bieber, F. R., Brenner, C., & Walsh, A. (2005). DNA identifications after the 9/11 World Trade Center attack. Science, 310(5751), 1122–1123.

Raina, A., Yadav, B., Ali, S., & Dogra, T. D. (2011). Identification of tumor specimens by DNA analysis in a case of histocytological paraffin tissue block swapping. Croatian Medical Journal, 52(3), 410–414.

Buś, M. M., & Allen, M. (2014). Collecting and preserving biological samples from challenging environments for DNA analysis. Biopreservation and Biobanking, 12(1), 17–22.

Published

2026-08-01

How to Cite

Dna Profiling: Identification of Corpse in a Distressing Disaster Situation. (2026). Indian Internet Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, 24(1&2), 30-35. https://doi.org/10.48165/iijfmt.2026.24.12.07