DETECTION OF SEED BORNE MYCOFLORA OF WHEAT

Authors

  • H S K Nagari Department of Plant Pathology, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (MS) India
  • S T Ingle Department of Plant Pathology, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (MS) India
  • Y V Ingle AICRP on Fruits, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, (MS) India
  • S S Mane Department of Plant Pathology, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (MS) India
  • Swati G Bharad Wheat Research Unit, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, (MS), India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/jpds.2025.20.2.25

Keywords:

Detection, Mycoflora, Seed borne, Wheat

Abstract

Detection of seed-borne mycoflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) was carried out during 2024–25 at the Department of Plant Pathology, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth (PDKV), Akola. The study aimed to identify the seed-borne mycoflora associated with different cultivars of wheat. Four incubation techniques, namely the standard blotter method, agar plate method, 2,4-D blotter method, and rolled paper towel method, were evaluated for their efficiency in detecting seed-borne fungi. A total of eight seed-borne fungal species were identified, namely Cladosporium cladosporioides, Alternaria alternata, Fusarium moniliforme, Curvularia lunata, Bipolaris sorokiniana, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus, and Rhizopus spp. Among the incubation methods, the agar plate method recorded the highest frequency of seed-borne mycoflora (93.25%), followed by the standard blotter method (87.00%), whereas the 2,4-D blotter method recorded 59.00%. The rolled paper towel method recorded the lowest detection of seed-borne mycoflora (35.75%). The standard blotter method proved most effective in detecting Cladosporium cladosporioides (23.00%) and Alternaria alternata (20.50%), while the agar plate method efficiently detected Curvularia lunata (13.75%) and Bipolaris sorokiniana (8.50%). Lower frequencies were observed for Aspergillus spp. and Rhizopus spp. across all incubation methods. It was concluded that the agar plate method and standard blotter method were more efficient for routine detection of seed-borne fungi in wheat. These methods are therefore recommended for seed health testing to ensure phytosanitary quality and disease-free seed production in wheat.

References

Barari, H., A. Afshari and M. Khodarahmi, 2012. Detection of seed-borne fungi of wheat and their pathogenic potential in Iran. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 45(18): 2203–2210.

Chandel, S. and S. Deepika, 2015. Evaluation of different culture media for the growth and sporulation of seed-borne fungi. Journal of Mycopathological Research, 53(1): 133–137.

Dhakar, R. C., R. P. Kumawat and R. S. Rathore, 2018. Comparative evaluation of seed health testing methods for the detection of seed-borne fungi in wheat. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 6(3): 2983–2986.

Ghosh, S., S. A. Shabnam and A. Sinha, 2018. Mycoflora associated with cereal seeds in India and their impact on seed health. Journal of Mycopathological Research, 56(3): 221–226.

ISTA (International Seed Testing Association), 1985. International rules for seed testing. Seed Science and Technology, Supplement Rules, Bassersdorf, Switzerland.

Kumar, R., M. Yadav and A. Singh, 2016. Detection and identification of seed-borne mycoflora in wheat and their management. International Journal of Advanced Research, 4(3): 140–144.

Kaur, R. and R. Aggarwal, 2017. Detection of seed-borne fungi using standard and modified blotter tests. Indian Phytopathology, 70(2): 192–195.

Mathur, S. B. and O. Kongsdal, 2003. Common laboratory seed health testing methods for detecting fungi. International Seed Testing Association, Bassersdorf, Switzerland, pp. 425.

Mohan, S., V. Singh and S. Gupta, 2011. Efficacy of seed health testing methods for detecting seed-borne fungi in wheat. Indian Phytopathology, 64(2): 156–158.

Mohapatra, N. K. and S. K. Mohanty, 2011. Comparative evaluation of methods for detection of seed-borne fungi in rice and wheat. Journal of Plant Protection and Environment, 8(2): 63–67.

Neergaard, P., 1977. Seed pathology. Vol. I and II. The Macmillan Press Ltd., London, UK.

Nicolaisen, M., S. Suproniene, L. K. Nielsen, I. Lazzaro, N. H. Spliid and A. F. Justesen, 2009. Real-time PCR for quantification of eleven individual Fusarium species in cereals. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 76(3): 234–240.

Shaban, M. and K. Kumar, 2000. Detection of seed-borne fungi of wheat in Rajasthan. Indian Phytopathology, 53(2): 178–180.

Sharma, A. and S. Chaurasia, 2014. Detection of seed-borne fungi in wheat and their control. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 4(9): 1–5.

Singh, P., A. Kumar and A. K. Mishra, 2018. Evaluation of seed health testing methods for detection of seed-borne fungi in wheat. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(3): 3443–3449.

Pathak, V. N. and M. A. Zaidi, 2013. Detection and control of seed-borne fungi in wheat. Indian Phytopathology, 66(2): 184–189.

Perello, A. E., M. V. Moreno and M. N. Sisterna, 2006. First report of Alternaria triticina causing leaf blight of wheat in Argentina. Plant Pathology, 55(2): 299.

Prasada, R. and A. S. Prabhu, 1962. Seed-borne nature of Alternaria triticina and its transmission in wheat. Indian Phytopathology, 15: 167–171.

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

DETECTION OF SEED BORNE MYCOFLORA OF WHEAT. (2025). Journal of Plant Disease Sciences, 20(2), 232-238. https://doi.org/10.48165/jpds.2025.20.2.25