<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN"
  "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.2">

  <front>

    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJA</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Indian Journal of Agroforestry</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">Indian Journal of Agroforestry</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2456-6489</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>ACS Publisher</publisher-name>
        <publisher-loc>India</publisher-loc>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>

    <article-meta>

      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.48165/ija.2025.27.02.05</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>

      <title-group>
        <article-title>Soil Fertility Underasana (Bridelia Retusa) Based Agroforestry Systems in Lateritic Soil of Konkan</article-title>
      </title-group>

      <contrib-group>

        <contrib contrib-type="author" id="AU1">
          <name>
            <surname>Mahadik</surname>
            <given-names>Smita P</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
        </contrib>

        <contrib contrib-type="author" id="AU2">
          <name>
            <surname>Dalvi</surname>
            <given-names>Vijay V</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
        </contrib>

        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" id="AU3">
          <name>
            <surname>Meshram</surname>
            <given-names>Nandkishor A</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
          <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="COR1"><sup>*</sup></xref>
        </contrib>

      </contrib-group>

      <aff id="aff1">
        <label>1</label>
        <institution>All India Coordinated Research Project on Agroforestry, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, College of Forestry, Dapoli, MS.</institution>
      </aff>

      <author-notes>
        <corresp id="COR1">
          <label>*</label>
          E-mail: <email>nandkishor.meshram@rediffmail.com</email>
        </corresp>
      </author-notes>

      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>22</day>
        <month>10</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>

      <volume>27</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>39</fpage>
      <lpage>43</lpage>
      <issue-title>April - June 2025</issue-title>

      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>7</day>
          <month>1</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="rev-recd">
          <day>10</day>
          <month>1</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>26</day>
          <month>6</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
      </history>

      <permissions>
        <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
        <copyright-holder>ACS Publisher Journal</copyright-holder>
      </permissions>

      <abstract>
        <p><italic>An experimental study was conducted during 2019-20 at the Research
Farm of AICRP on
Agroforestry, Dr. BSKKV,
Dapoli, Maharashtra. The results indicated that, significantly high soil
fertility of Asana based agroforestry was recorded by T6&gt;T5&gt;T7 than
other. The soil fertility status was noted slightly improvement in pH (5.94 to
5.97) and EC (0.232 to 0.254 dSm-1) by T6 during the years of 2019 and
2020. The maximum organic carbon (2.18 to 2.27 %), N (343.66 kg ha-1), and (351.33 kg ha-1), available P2O5 (22.30 to

25.20 kg ha-1) and available K2O (439.08
to 455.84 kg ha-1) was recorded
in T6 in the year of
2019 and 2020, respectively. Overall, it can be concluded that the improving
soil fertility were recorded significantly by T6&gt;T5&gt;T7 than other, it may
be due to presence of high amount biomass contribution and addition organic
matter in the soil. Thus, T6 –Asana + Jam is the best treatment under asana
based agroforestry systems seem to be increased the soil fertility in lateritic soils of Konkan.</italic></p>
      </abstract>

      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
        <title>Keywords</title>
        <kwd>Agroforestry systems</kwd>
        <kwd>Available nutrients</kwd>
        <kwd>Bridelia Retusa</kwd>
        <kwd>Syzygium samarangense</kwd>
      </kwd-group>

      <funding-group>
        <funding-statement>No specific funding was received for this study.</funding-statement>
      </funding-group>

    </article-meta>
  </front>

  <body>

    <sec id="S1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Agroforestry, the practice of introducing trees in farming system has played a significant role in enhancing land productivity and improving livelihood in both developed and developing countries. The planting of tree along with crops improves soil fertility, controls and prevents soil erosion, controls water logging, checks acidification and eutrophication of stream and rivers, increases local biodiversity, decreases pressure on natural forests for fuel and provides fodder for livestock (Mukundi and Sathaye, 2004). Soil fertility is the main factor affecting crop productivity. <italic>Bridelia retusa </italic>(L.) A. Juss., locally known as Asana belongs to Euphorbiaceae family. Normally asana was found in Konkan region of Maharashtra. It is an indigenous species in Konkan widely use farmers as a fodder and multipurpose tree species. It is found throughout India up to an altitude of 1000 m, except in very dry regions. Bark is grey to brown exfoliating in irregular flakes. By Asana based agroforestry systems removing carbon from the atmosphere and developing soil fertility and also helps to improved productivity of plants and crops. In contrast to selected forest tree along with some crop species for soil improvement naturally in the bio- diverse condition. This system used for bund plantation, block plantation, as a source of nutrient etc. easily in Konkan region. Therefore, considering that there is an increasing need to reforest the expanding areas of degraded land by easily available agroforestry sources that occurs in most parts of the Konkan region of Maharashtra, The present study focuses on “Soil Fertility under Asana based Agroforestry Systems in Rainfed Lateritic Soil. “Arial yam (<italic>Dioscorea bulbifera</italic>), Pineapple (<italic>Ananas comosus</italic>), Elephant foot yam (<italic>Amorphophallus paeonifolins</italic>), Mulberry (<italic>Morus alba</italic>), Karonda (<italic>Carissa carandas</italic>), Jam (<italic>Syzygium samarangense</italic>), Seedless lemon (<italic>Citrus latifolia</italic>), are being selected as intercrops in agroforestry system.</p>
    </sec>

    <sec id="S2">
      <title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title>
      <p>The experiment was conducted at Research Farm of All India Co-ordinated Research Project on Agroforestry, Central Experimental Station, Wakavali, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Dist. Ratnagiri, Maharashtra during 2019- 2020. The experimental soil is characterized by reddish colour; Lateritic type of Alfisols. The 15 years old block plantation of Asana tree species and framed in a randomized block design (RBD) with eight treatments and three replications. The treatment comprises <italic>viz. </italic>T1- Asana + Arial yam (<italic>Dioscorea bulbifera</italic>), T2- Asana + Pine apple (<italic>Ananas comosus</italic>), ,T3- Asana + Elephant foot, T4- Asana + Mulberry (<italic>Morus alba</italic>), T5- Asana + Karonda (<italic>Carissa carandas</italic>), T6- Asana + Jam (<italic>Syzygium samarangense</italic>), T7- Asana + Seedless Lemon (<italic>Citrus latifolia</italic>), T8- Only Asana (<italic>Bridelia retusa</italic>).Plot wise soil samples were collected at initial and after 1 year period of soil analyzing for physicochemical properties of soil. Soil samples were collected at the depth of 0-30 cm and it was air dried, powdered and passed through &lt;2 mm sieve for determination of physico-chemical properties. Bulk density was determine by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R4">Blake and Hartge (1986)</xref>, Maximum water holding capacity determined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R17">Piper (1966)</xref>, electrical conductivity (EC), soil reaction (pH), were determined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R12">Jackson (1973)</xref>, organic carbon (OC) was determine by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R17">Piper (1966)</xref>, available N determined by Subbiah and Asija, 1956, available P determined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R5">Bray and Kurtz (1945)</xref> and available K determined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R17">Piper (1966)</xref>.</p>
    </sec>

    <sec id="S3">
      <title>RESULTS AND DISSCUSION</title>
      <p>Bulk density of soil: The improved bulk density of soil was observed under T6- Asana+ Jam (<italic>Bridelia retusa + Syzygium samarangense</italic>) 1.36 Mg m-3  in 2019 and 1.38 Mg m-3 in 2020. The less improvement of bulk density of soil was noted under T8 - only Asana (<italic>Bridelia retusa</italic>) 1.48 Mg m-3 in 2019 and 1.50 Mg m-3 in 2020, respectively. It is given in (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). Less improvement in bulk density of soil was recorded in T8 - only Asana (<italic>Bridelia retusa</italic>) as compare to other species may be due to high compactions rate and less aggregations comparably to other. The maximum improvement in bulk density of soil might be due to the addition of plant and root biomass in soil and high builds up carbon in the soil helps to improved water stable in soil aggregates and microspores ultimately improved bulk density of soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R15">Meshram <italic>et al. </italic>2020</xref>). Similar finding were observed by Hirmas <italic>et al. </italic>(2005), Ramesh <italic>et al. </italic>(2009) and Choudhury <italic>et al. </italic>(2013) the application of organic influenced the soil fertility and increased bulk density of soil.</p>
      <p>Maximum water holding capacity of soil: The perusal data of maximum water holding capacity (MWHC) of soil are given in (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). The maximum water holding capacity of soil was noted significantly high in T6 – Asana+ Jam (<italic>Bridelia retusa + Syzygium samarangense</italic>) 57.07% in 2019 and increased up to 60.27% in the year of 2020. Lowest MWHC of soil was noted in T8- only Asana (<italic>Bridelia retusa</italic>) 49.16% and 51.61% in the year of 2019 and 2020 respectively. The higher water holding capacity may be due to addition of organic matter in the soil helps to maintain high pore spaces (increases micro-capillary and macro-capillary pores in soil) resulted, it filled the high amount of water (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R15">Meshram <italic>et al. </italic>2020</xref>). Moreover, Zou <italic>et al. </italic>(2001) also observed that increased rooting depth of different forest species significantly influenced bulk density and porosity of soil due to higher addition of root biomass ultimately greater formation of macro and micro pores inside which held high amount of water.</p>
      <p>pH of soil: The study revealed that the T6– Asana+ Jam (<italic>Bridelia retusa + Syzygium samarangense</italic>) was noted highest pH 5.94 in 2019 and increased up to</p>
      <p>5.97 in 2020 and T8– Only Asana (<italic>Bridelia retusa</italic>) had the lowest pH 5.27 in 2019 and 5.31 in 2020. The soil reaction like pH of soil had significant under different land use system and the data is given in (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). The improvement in pH of soil may be attributed to several mechanisms that release H+ ions such as soil-based cation uptake and decomposition of organic matter to organic acid (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R15">Meshram <italic>et al. </italic>2020</xref>). Similar findings were reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R9">Emma (2005)</xref> also observed that the addition of agroforestry litter and some phyto- remidial effect cause to increase soil pH particularly in acid soils. Singh <italic>et al. </italic>(2017) observed that after seven year plantation of Prosopis juliflora agroforestry systems were significantly influenced improvement in pH, EC, organic carbon of soil and productivity and also recorded the reclamation capacity in Alkali soil.</p>
      <p>Electrical conductivity (EC): The maximum electrical conductivity of soil was found significantly in T6– Asana + Jam ( <italic>Bridelia retusa + Syzygium samarangense</italic>) 0.232 in 2019 dS m-1 and increased up to 0.254 dS m-1 in the year of 2020. While less in T8 – Only Asana (<italic>Bridelia retusa</italic>) 0.076 in 2019 and 0.09 dS m-1 in 2020. Data of electrical conductivity of soil of asana-based agroforestry system shown in (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). The higher improvement of electrical conductivity was recorded in T6 – Asana + Jam (<italic>Bridelia retusa + Syzygium samarangense</italic>). The low electrical conductivity could be due to the leaching of soluble salts due to heavy precipitation resulting into less concentration of soluble salts in the soil. Ekhuya <italic>et al.</italic>, (2015) recorded that the soils under Grevillea robusta have significantly higher pH, EC, Organic carbon and total organic carbon due high addition of agroforestry biomass in acidic soils. Singh <italic>et al. </italic>(2017) observed that after seven-year plantation of Prosopis juliflora agroforestry systems are significantly influenced improvement in pH, EC, Organic carbon of soil and productivity and also recorded the reclamation capacity in Alkali soil.</p>
      <p>Organic carbon: The maximum organic carbon of soil was recorded by T6 – Asana + Jam (<italic>Bridelia retusa + Syzygium samarangense</italic>) 2.18% and 2.27. While lowest organic carbon was found in T8 – Only Asana (<italic>Bridelia retusa</italic>) 1.68% and 1.71% in the year of 2019 and 2020, respectively. The data of soil organic carbon under asana-based agroforestry systems is given in (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). Similarly, Chakravarty <italic>et al. </italic>(2011) recorded that the soil organic carbon (SOC) per cent was highest in natural forest of Shorea robusta which as significantly higher than rest of the land use systems. Bhavya <italic>et al. </italic>(2017) observed that the soil organic carbon under Mango orchard has significantly higher than other land use systems. Available Nitrogen of soil: Significantly higher available nitrogen of soil was recorded in T6 – Asana + Jam (<italic>Bridelia  retusa  </italic>+  <italic>Syzygium  samarangense</italic>)</p>
      <p>343.66 kg ha-1  in 2019 and increased up to 351.33 kg ha-1 in 2020 whereas lowest in T8– Only Asana (<italic>Bridelia retusa</italic>) 298.07 kg ha-1 in 2019 and 303.92 kg ha-1 in 2020. The data on available nitrogen of soil is given in (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). It might be attributed due to the available N status although showed increased under the organic matter, it has not been increased much due to the prevailing climatic condition accelerating oxidation of organic matter as well as the nature of nitrogen forms in the soil in the form of its losses through volatilization and leaching (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R15">Meshram <italic>et al. </italic>2020</xref>). Similarly, Sing <italic>et al. </italic>(2010) observed that available N, P, K under poplar-based agroforestry system. They found available nitrogen were statistically significant. Available N, P, K improved the soil fertility due to deposition of litter. Moreover, Zeng <italic>et al. </italic>(2010) and Basak <italic>et al. </italic>(2018) reported that the increases in NPK status due to the addition nutrients through agroforestry litters may be contributed to the sustainability of crop and improved soil fertility.</p>
      <p><xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>. Physical properties of soil under asana based agroforestry systems</p>
      <table-wrap id="T1">
        <label>Table 1</label>
        <table>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td>Treatments</td>
            <td>Bulk density (Mg m-3)</td>
            <td>Water holding capacity (%)</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>2019</td>
            <td>2020</td>
            <td>2019</td>
            <td>2020</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>T1-Asana + Arial yam (Dioscorea bulbifera)</td>
            <td>1.44</td>
            <td>1.45</td>
            <td>52.74</td>
            <td>54.88</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>T2- Asana + Pine apple (Ananas comosus)</td>
            <td>1.47</td>
            <td>1.47</td>
            <td>53.49</td>
            <td>55.08</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>T3- Asana + Elephant foot yam (Amorphophallus paeonifolins)</td>
            <td>1.40</td>
            <td>1.42</td>
            <td>52.92</td>
            <td>54.62</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>T4- Asana + Mulberry (Morus alba)</td>
            <td>1.42</td>
            <td>1.44</td>
            <td>54.03</td>
            <td>56.77</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>T5- Asana + Karonda (Carissa carandas)</td>
            <td>1.39</td>
            <td>1.41</td>
            <td>54.92</td>
            <td>57.43</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>T6- Asana + Jam (Syzygium samarangense)</td>
            <td>1.36</td>
            <td>1.38</td>
            <td>57.07</td>
            <td>60.27</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>T7- Asana + Seedless Lemon (Citrus latifolia)</td>
            <td>1.41</td>
            <td>1.42</td>
            <td>54.08</td>
            <td>57.07</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>T8- Only Asana (Bridelia retusa)</td>
            <td>1.48</td>
            <td>1.50</td>
            <td>49.16</td>
            <td>51.61</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Mean</td>
            <td>1.42</td>
            <td>1.44</td>
            <td>53.55</td>
            <td>55.97</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>S.Em.±</td>
            <td>0.009</td>
            <td>0.012</td>
            <td>1.32</td>
            <td>1.22</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>C.D. at 5 %</td>
            <td>0.028</td>
            <td>0.036</td>
            <td>4.01</td>
            <td>3.71</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>C.V. %</td>
            <td>1.11</td>
            <td>1.43</td>
            <td>4.27</td>
            <td>3.79</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>

      <p><xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>. Chemical properties of soil under asana based agroforestry systems</p>
      <table-wrap id="T2">
        <label>Table 2</label>
        <table>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td>Treatments</td>
            <td>pH (1:2.5)</td>
            <td>EC (dS m-1)</td>
            <td>Organic carbon (%)</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>2019</td>
            <td>2020</td>
            <td>2019</td>
            <td>2020</td>
            <td>2019</td>
            <td>2020</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>T1-Asana + Arial yam (Dioscorea bulbifera)</td>
            <td>5.83</td>
            <td>5.87</td>
            <td>0.096</td>
            <td>0.108</td>
            <td>1.81</td>
            <td>1.91</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>T2- Asana + Pine apple (Ananas comosus)</td>
            <td>5.82</td>
            <td>5.84</td>
            <td>0.084</td>
            <td>0.097</td>
            <td>1.79</td>
            <td>1.88</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>T3- Asana + Elephant foot yam (Amorphophallus paeonifolins)</td>
            <td>5.34</td>
            <td>5.44</td>
            <td>0.108</td>
            <td>0.120</td>
            <td>1.85</td>
            <td>1.91</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>T4- Asana + Mulberry (Morus alba)</td>
            <td>5.82</td>
            <td>5.85</td>
            <td>0.099</td>
            <td>0.115</td>
            <td>1.87</td>
            <td>1.95</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>T5- Asana + Karonda (Carissa carandas)</td>
            <td>5.85</td>
            <td>5.88</td>
            <td>0.137</td>
            <td>0.150</td>
            <td>1.89</td>
            <td>1.99</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>T6- Asana + Jam (Syzygium samarangense)</td>
            <td>5.94</td>
            <td>5.97</td>
            <td>0.232</td>
            <td>0.254</td>
            <td>2.18</td>
            <td>2.27</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>T7- Asana + Seedless Lemon (Citrus latifolia)</td>
            <td>5.92</td>
            <td>5.95</td>
            <td>0.132</td>
            <td>0.149</td>
            <td>1.87</td>
            <td>1.96</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>T8- Only Asana (Bridelia retusa)</td>
            <td>5.27</td>
            <td>5.31</td>
            <td>0.076</td>
            <td>0.090</td>
            <td>1.68</td>
            <td>1.71</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Mean</td>
            <td>5.72</td>
            <td>5.762</td>
            <td>0.120</td>
            <td>0.135</td>
            <td>1.87</td>
            <td>1.95</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>S.Em.±</td>
            <td>0.059</td>
            <td>0.047</td>
            <td>0.003</td>
            <td>0.004</td>
            <td>0.008</td>
            <td>0.012</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>C.D. at 5 %</td>
            <td>0.179</td>
            <td>0.143</td>
            <td>0.009</td>
            <td>0.011</td>
            <td>0.024</td>
            <td>0.035</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>C.V. %</td>
            <td>1.78</td>
            <td>1.42</td>
            <td>4.55</td>
            <td>4.6</td>
            <td>0.73</td>
            <td>1.04</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>

      <p>Available phosphorus of soil: The available phosphorus of soil was noted highest in T6 – Asana + Jam (<italic>Bridelia retusa + Syzygium samarangense</italic>)</p>
      <p>22.30 kg ha-1 in 2019 and increased up to 25.20 kg ha-1 in the year of 2020. While lowest in T8 – Only Asana (<italic>Bridelia retusa</italic>) 14.63 kg ha-1 and 15.21 kg ha-1, respectively in the years of experiment. The perusal data pertaining to available phosphorus in the soil is specified in (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>).Highest available phosphorus was recorded in T6 – Asana + Jam (<italic>Bridelia retusa + Syzygium samarangense</italic>) followed by T5–Asana + Karonda (<italic>Bridelia retusa + Carissa carandas</italic>), T7– Asana + Seedless lemon (<italic>Bridelia retusa + Citrus latifolia</italic>), this might have also solubilized the native phosphorus in the soil through the release of various organic acids which had the chelating effect that reduced phosphorus fixation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R15">Meshram <italic>et al. </italic>2020</xref>). Similar findings were also recorded by Finzi <italic>et al. </italic>(2001) during decomposition study maximum availability of the soil phosphorus in deciduous forest than pine forest due to optimum amount of moisture and decomposition of agroforestry litters in soil. Moreover, Kumar <italic>et al. </italic>(2017) showed the addition of litters contributed highest soil organic carbon and manganese was positively correlated with plant nutrients like (NPK).</p>
      <p>Available potassium of soil: Among various land use system under asana-based agroforestry systems, data were found to be statistically significant and given in (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). The available potassium of soil uppermost in T6–Asana + Jam (<italic>Bridelia retusa + Syzygium samarangense</italic>) 439.08 kg ha-1 and 455.84 kg ha-1 followed by T5 – Asana + Karonda (<italic>Bridelia retusa + Carissa carandas</italic>) 426.23 kg ha-1 and 440.57 kg ha-1 whereas lowest in T8 – Only Asana (<italic>Bridelia retusa</italic>) 338.56 kg ha-1 and 345.69 kg ha-1 during 2019 and 2020 respectively. The higher potassium in the soils might be due to greater degree of weathering of potash minerals in the region and higher amount of nitrogen content in the leaves of T6 – Asana + Jam which leads to synergistic effect through plant and root biomass contribution in soil or apply decomposition which increased the potassium content of the soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R15">Meshram <italic>et al. </italic>2020</xref>). Potassium enhanced cellulose decomposition; one or more micronutrients enhanced leaf litter and crop residues (fine roots and straw). However, Alfaia <italic>et al. </italic>(2003) and Singh <italic>et al. </italic>(2010) recorded observed that the decomposition rate and higher amount of C, N, P, K (nutrients) returned in the soil under agroforestry systems.</p>
    </sec>

    <sec id="S4">
      <title>CONCLUSION</title>
      <p>It can be concluded that the improvement of soil fertility was recorded significantly by T6-Asana + Jam (<italic>Syzygium samarangense</italic>) followed by T5- Asana + Karonda (<italic>Carissa carandas</italic>) than other systems. Build up soil carbon was found due to addition of more amount of plant biomass in soil, fine roots of T6 – Asana + Jam, T5 – Asana + Karonda, T7 – Asana + Seedless lemon, T4 – Asana + Mulberry and also developed bio- stability in soil which helps to maintain soil health. The improvement of available macronutrients of soil were recorded maximum by addition of organic matter in T6 – Asana + Jam, followed by T5 – Asana + Karonda, T7 – Asana + Seedless lemon and T4 – Asana + Mulberry which helps to determining carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium mineralization in soil for development of soil fertility. T6 – Asana + Jam is the best treatment under asana based agroforestry systems seem to be increased the soil fertility.</p>
      <p><xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>. Chemical properties of soil under asana based agroforestry systems</p>
      <table-wrap id="T3">
        <label>Table 3</label>
        <table>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td>Treatments</td>
            <td>Available N (kg ha-1)</td>
            <td>Available P2O5 (kg ha-1)</td>
            <td>Available K2O (kg ha-1)</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>2019</td>
            <td>2020</td>
            <td>2019</td>
            <td>2020</td>
            <td>2019</td>
            <td>2020</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>T1-Asana + Arial yam (Dioscorea bulbifera)</td>
            <td>321.86</td>
            <td>328.20</td>
            <td>17.33</td>
            <td>18.64</td>
            <td>370.03</td>
            <td>394.79</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>T2- Asana + Pine apple (Ananas comosus)</td>
            <td>314.57</td>
            <td>319.61</td>
            <td>15.66</td>
            <td>16.08</td>
            <td>367.97</td>
            <td>390.73</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>T3- Asana + Elephant foot yam (Amorphophallus paeonifolins)</td>
            <td>326.40</td>
            <td>331.36</td>
            <td>18.65</td>
            <td>19.81</td>
            <td>374.16</td>
            <td>400.66</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>T4- Asana + Mulberry (Morus alba)</td>
            <td>325.49</td>
            <td>330.13</td>
            <td>17.84</td>
            <td>19.17</td>
            <td>371.58</td>
            <td>398.40</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>T5- Asana + Karonda (Carissa carandas)</td>
            <td>332.36</td>
            <td>339.34</td>
            <td>19.09</td>
            <td>21.40</td>
            <td>426.23</td>
            <td>440.57</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>T6- Asana + Jam (Syzygium samarangense)</td>
            <td>343.66</td>
            <td>351.33</td>
            <td>22.30</td>
            <td>25.20</td>
            <td>439.08</td>
            <td>455.84</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>T7- Asana + Seedless Lemon (Citrus latifolia)</td>
            <td>329.61</td>
            <td>335.51</td>
            <td>18.92</td>
            <td>20.54</td>
            <td>418.92</td>
            <td>431.35</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>T8- Only Asana (Bridelia retusa)</td>
            <td>298.07</td>
            <td>303.92</td>
            <td>14.63</td>
            <td>15.21</td>
            <td>338.56</td>
            <td>345.69</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Mean</td>
            <td>324.00</td>
            <td>329.93</td>
            <td>18.05</td>
            <td>19.50</td>
            <td>388.32</td>
            <td>407.26</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>S.E. m.±</td>
            <td>1.64</td>
            <td>1.61</td>
            <td>0.50</td>
            <td>0.56</td>
            <td>1.57</td>
            <td>1.56</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>C.D. at 5 %</td>
            <td>4.97</td>
            <td>4.87</td>
            <td>1.53</td>
            <td>1.69</td>
            <td>4.76</td>
            <td>4.73</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>C.V. %</td>
            <td>0.88</td>
            <td>0.84</td>
            <td>4.84</td>
            <td>4.96</td>
            <td>0.7</td>
            <td>0.66</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>

    </sec>

  </body>

  <back>

    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>

      <ref id="R1">
        <element-citation publication-type="book-chapter">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Alfaia</surname><given-names>S. S., Ribeiro, G. A., Nobre, A. D., Luizão, R. C</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Luizão</surname><given-names>F. J</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Evaluation of soil fertility in smallholder agroforestry systems and pastures in western Amazonia</article-title>
          <source>Agriculture</source>
          <year>2003</year>
          <volume>102</volume>
          <fpage>409</fpage>
          <lpage>414</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R2">
        <element-citation publication-type="book-chapter">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Basak</surname><given-names>N., Kumar, P., Mishra, A. K., Chaudhari, S. K., Rai, P., Singh, K., Singh, R., Pandey, C. B</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Sharma</surname><given-names>D. K</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Carbon pools and nutrient dynamics under Eucalyptus-based agroforestry system in semi-arid region of north-west India</article-title>
          <source>Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science</source>
          <year>2018</year>
          <volume>66</volume>
          <issue>2</issue>
          <fpage>188</fpage>
          <lpage>199</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R3">
        <element-citation publication-type="book-chapter">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Bhavya</surname><given-names>V. P., Anil Kumar, S., Shiva Kumar, K. M., Alur, A</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Shivanna</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Land use systems to improve carbon sequestration in soil for mitigation of climate change</article-title>
          <source>International Journal of Chemical Studies</source>
          <year>2017</year>
          <volume>5</volume>
          <issue>4</issue>
          <fpage>2019</fpage>
          <lpage>2021</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R4">
        <element-citation publication-type="book-chapter">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Blake</surname><given-names>G. R</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Hartge</surname><given-names>K. H</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Bulk density</article-title>
          <source>In A. Klute (Ed.)</source>
          <year>1986</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R5">
        <element-citation publication-type="book-chapter">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Bray</surname><given-names>R. H</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Kurtz</surname><given-names>L. T</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Determination of total, organic, and available forms of phosphorus in soils</article-title>
          <source>Soil Science</source>
          <year>1945</year>
          <volume>59</volume>
          <fpage>39</fpage>
          <lpage>45</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R6">
        <element-citation publication-type="book-chapter">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Chakravarty</surname><given-names>S., Koul, D. N., Shukla, G</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Panwar</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Status of soil carbon sequestration under different land use systems in Terai zone of West Bengal</article-title>
          <source>Environment and Ecology</source>
          <year>2011</year>
          <volume>6</volume>
          <fpage>95</fpage>
          <lpage>100</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R7">
        <element-citation publication-type="book-chapter">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Choudhury</surname><given-names>B. U., Mohapatra, K. P., Das, A., Das, P. T., Nongkhlaw, L., Fiyaz, A. R., Ngachan, S. V., Rajkhowa, D. J</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Munda</surname><given-names>G. C</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Spatial variability in distribution of organic carbon stocks in the soils of north-east India</article-title>
          <source>Current Science</source>
          <year>2013</year>
          <volume>104</volume>
          <issue>5</issue>
          <fpage>604</fpage>
          <lpage>614</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R8">
        <element-citation publication-type="book-chapter">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Ekhuya</surname><given-names>N., Wesonga, J., Muriuki, J</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Mowo</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Influence of selected tree species on soil characteristics, growth and yield of maize in Western Kenya</article-title>
          <source>African Journal of Agricultural Research</source>
          <year>2015</year>
          <volume>10</volume>
          <fpage>2399</fpage>
          <lpage>2406</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R9">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Emma</surname><given-names>J. S</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Using experimental manipulation to assess the roles of leaf litter</article-title>
          <source>Agriculture</source>
          <year>2005</year>
          <volume>80</volume>
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          <lpage>31</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R10">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Finzi</surname><given-names>A. C., Allen, A. S., DeLucia, E. H., Ellsworth, D. S</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Schlesinger</surname><given-names>W. H</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Forest litter production, chemistry, and decomposition following two years of free-air CO₂ enrichment</article-title>
          <source>Indian Journal of Ecology</source>
          <year>2001</year>
          <volume>82</volume>
          <fpage>470</fpage>
          <lpage>484</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R11">
        <element-citation publication-type="book-chapter">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Hirmas</surname><given-names>D. R</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Furquim</surname><given-names>S. A. C</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Simple modification of the clod method for determining bulk density of very gravelly soils</article-title>
          <source>Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis</source>
          <year>2006</year>
          <volume>37</volume>
          <fpage>899</fpage>
          <lpage>906</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R12">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Jackson</surname><given-names>M. L</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Soil chemical analysis</article-title>
          <source>Prentice Hall of India</source>
          <year>1973</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R13">
        <element-citation publication-type="book-chapter">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>M., Kumar, V., Kumar, R</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Pratap</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Correlation between soil nutrient and plant nutrient concentration in mustard</article-title>
          <source>Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry</source>
          <year>2017</year>
          <volume>6</volume>
          <issue>4</issue>
          <fpage>751</fpage>
          <lpage>754</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R14">
        <element-citation publication-type="book-chapter">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Makundi</surname><given-names>W. R</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Sathaye</surname><given-names>J. A</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>GHG mitigation potential and cost in tropical forestry—Relative role for agroforestry</article-title>
          <source>Environment</source>
          <year>2004</year>
          <volume>6</volume>
          <fpage>235</fpage>
          <lpage>260</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R15">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Meshram</surname><given-names>N. A., Dalvi, V. V., Pinjari, S. S., Rathod, R. R</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Narkhade</surname><given-names>S. S</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Litter's effect on soil physicochemical and biological processes</article-title>
          <source>Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences</source>
          <year>2020</year>
          <volume>90</volume>
          <issue>6</issue>
          <fpage>1166</fpage>
          <lpage>1169</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R16">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Panse</surname><given-names>V. G</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Sukhatme</surname><given-names>P. V</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Statistical methods for agricultural workers</article-title>
          <source>Indian Council of Agricultural Research</source>
          <year>1985</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R17">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Piper</surname><given-names>C. S</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Soil and plant analysis</article-title>
          <source>Hans's Publications</source>
          <year>1966</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R18">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Ramesh</surname><given-names>P., Panwar, N. R., Singh, A. B</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Ramana</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Effect of organic nutrient management practices on production potential, nutrient uptake, soil quality, input use efficiency and economics of mustard (Brassica juncea)</article-title>
          <source>Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences</source>
          <year>2009</year>
          <volume>79</volume>
          <issue>1</issue>
          <fpage>40</fpage>
          <lpage>44</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R19">
        <element-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Sankaram</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Laboratory manual for agricultural chemistry (pp. 144–146)</article-title>
          <source>Asia Publishing House</source>
          <year>1966</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R20">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Shibu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Sougata</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Agroforestry for biomass production and carbon sequestration: An overview</article-title>
          <source>Agroforestry Systems</source>
          <year>2012</year>
          <volume>86</volume>
          <fpage>105</fpage>
          <lpage>111</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R21">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>B., Gill, R. I. S</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>[initials unavailable]</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Gill</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Soil fertility under various tree species and poplar-based agroforestry system</article-title>
          <source>Journal of Research</source>
          <year>2010</year>
          <volume>47</volume>
          <fpage>160</fpage>
          <lpage>164</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R22">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>Y. P., Singh, G. B., Sharma, D. K</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Arora</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Evaluation of different agroforestry systems for their effect on alkali soil</article-title>
          <source>Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science</source>
          <year>2017</year>
          <volume>65</volume>
          <fpage>42</fpage>
          <lpage>47</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R23">
        <element-citation publication-type="book-chapter">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Subbiah</surname><given-names>B. V</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Asija</surname><given-names>G. L</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>A rapid procedure for the estimation of nitrogen in soil</article-title>
          <source>Current Science</source>
          <year>1956</year>
          <volume>25</volume>
          <fpage>259</fpage>
          <lpage>260</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R24">
        <element-citation publication-type="book-chapter">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Tiessen</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Moir</surname><given-names>J. O</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Total and organic carbon</article-title>
          <source>In Soil sampling and methods of analysis (pp. 187–211)</source>
          <year>1993</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R25">
        <element-citation publication-type="book-chapter">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Zeng</surname><given-names>D.-H., Mao, R., Chang, S. X., Li, L.-J</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Carbon mineralization of tree leaf litter and crop residues from poplar-based agroforestry systems in Northeast China: A laboratory study</article-title>
          <source>Applied Soil Ecology</source>
          <year>2010</year>
          <volume>44</volume>
          <fpage>133</fpage>
          <lpage>137</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R26">
        <element-citation publication-type="book-chapter">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Zou</surname><given-names>S. Y., Zhang, J. L</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Feng</surname><given-names>Z. F</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Desertified land analysis in Horqin sandy land</article-title>
          <source>Journal of Desert Research</source>
          <year>2001</year>
          <volume>21</volume>
          <fpage>76</fpage>
          <lpage>78</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

    </ref-list>

  </back>

</article>
