<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN"
  "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.2">

  <front>

    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJA</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Indian Journal of Agroforestry</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">Indian Journal of Agroforestry</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2456-6489</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>ACS Publisher</publisher-name>
        <publisher-loc>India</publisher-loc>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>

    <article-meta>

      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.48165/ija.2026.28.01.14</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>

      <title-group>
        <article-title>Wood utilization prospects of Neolamarckia cadamba
based on age and axial dependent fibre morphology</article-title>
      </title-group>

      <contrib-group>

        <contrib contrib-type="author" id="AU1">
          <name>
            <surname>Roghan</surname>
            <given-names>H B</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
        </contrib>

        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" id="AU2">
          <name>
            <surname>Sekar</surname>
            <given-names>I</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
          <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="COR1"><sup>*</sup></xref>
        </contrib>

        <contrib contrib-type="author" id="AU3">
          <name>
            <surname>Sivaprakash</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
        </contrib>

        <contrib contrib-type="author" id="AU4">
          <name>
            <surname>Vennila</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
        </contrib>

        <contrib contrib-type="author" id="AU5">
          <name>
            <surname>Jenifer</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref>
        </contrib>

      </contrib-group>

      <aff id="aff1">
        <label>1</label>
        <institution>Ph.D. Research Scholar, Department of Agroforestry, Forest College and Research Institute, Mettupalayam- 641 301, Tamil Nadu</institution>
      </aff>

      <aff id="aff2">
        <label>2</label>
        <institution>Professor and Head, Department of Forest Biology and Tree Improvement, Forest College and Research Institute, Mettupalayam-641 301, Tamil Nadu</institution>
      </aff>

      <aff id="aff3">
        <label>3</label>
        <institution>Associate Professor (Forestry), Department of Agroforestry, Forest College and Research Institute, Mettupalayam-641 301, Tamil Nadu</institution>
      </aff>

      <aff id="aff4">
        <label>4</label>
        <institution>Assistant Professor (Forestry), Department of Agronomy, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Vazhavachanur, Tiruvannamalai -606 753, Tamil Nadu</institution>
      </aff>

      <aff id="aff5">
        <label>5</label>
        <institution>Forest College and Research Institute, Mettupalayam- 641 301, Tamil Nadu</institution>
      </aff>

      <author-notes>
        <corresp id="COR1">
          <label>*</label>
          E-mail: <email>sekar.i@tnau.ac.in</email>
        </corresp>
      </author-notes>

      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>

      <volume>28</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>110</fpage>
      <lpage>113</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>12</day>
          <month>1</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>19</day>
          <month>3</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>

      <abstract>
        <p>The present study investigates the anatomical characteristics of Neolamarckia cadamba wood with emphasis on age-wise and axial variations in fibre morphology. Wood samples were collected from trees of five different ages (2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 years) and analyzed for fibre length, fibre diameter, lumen width and cell wall thickness using standard microscopic techniques. The results revealed significant variation in fibre morphology with age. Fibre length increased from 1509.00 µm at 2 years to 1854.16 µm at 10 years, indicating improved fibre development with maturity. Fibre diameter also showed a gradual increase, whereas lumen width increased up to 6 years and declined thereafter. In contrast, cell wall thickness increased substantially at older ages, suggesting enhanced fibre strength. Axial variation within the tree indicated that fibre length decreased significantly from base to top, while fibre diameter, lumen width and wall thickness showed non-significant variation along the stem. The findings highlight that age has a stronger influence than axial position on fibre characteristics. Neolamarckia cadamba exhibits favorable fibre properties, particularly at intermediate ages, making it a promising species for pulp, paper and other wood-based industries</p>
      </abstract>

      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
        <title>Keywords</title>
        <kwd>Neolamarckia cadamba</kwd>
        <kwd>Age</kwd>
        <kwd>Axial Variation</kwd>
        <kwd>Fibre morphology</kwd>
        <kwd>Strength</kwd>
      </kwd-group>

      <funding-group>
        <funding-statement>No specific funding was received for this study.</funding-statement>
      </funding-group>

    </article-meta>
  </front>

  <body>

    <sec id="S1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p><italic>Neolamarckia cadamba </italic>(Roxb.) Bosser locally known as 'Kadamba', is a tropical tree species native to South Asia and Southeast Asia, including India. It is a large tropical tree with broad a crown and straight cylindrical bole having an average height of 15 meters with self- pruning ability. Under favorable climatic conditions, this tree attains a height of 20 m or more with a clean bole of about 9 m and a diameter of 40 to 60 cm. In Assam, the tree attains a height of 6.5 m and diameter of 12.7 cm at 4 years (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R3">Ghosh, 1977</xref>). The rate of growth is very fast in the earlier years, the height increment averages 3 m per annum for the first six or eight years after which the growth slow up to 20 years and thereafter becomes very slow. This species is increasingly important for wood- based industries. Wood of this species is suitable for multiple end uses, such as plywood, light construction materials, flooring, beams and rafters, boxes and crates, tea-chests, packing cases, shuttering, ceiling boards, toys, wooden shoes, bobbins, yokes, carvings, matches, chopsticks and pencils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R13">Soerianegara and Lemmens, 1993</xref>). This species is expected to become highly important to meet the gap between demand and supply of raw materials for pulpwood, matchwood, pencil and plywood wood-based industries. There is already a high demand for pencils, plywood and match splints in India. Although, the species is indigenous, fast growing with multiple uses, it has received little research attention and there is no tree improvement programme for this species. The objective of the study was to access the anatomical properties of <italic>N. cadamba </italic>wood at different ages.</p>
    </sec>

    <sec id="S2">
      <title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title>
      <p>Species Name: <italic>Neolamarckia cadamba </italic>(Roxb.) Bosser</p>
      <p>Sample collection</p>
      <p><bold> </bold></p>
      <table-wrap id="T1">
        <label>Table 1</label>
        <table>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td>Age (years)</td>
            <td>Diameter (cm)</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Base</td>
            <td>Middle</td>
            <td>Top</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>2</td>
            <td>11.60</td>
            <td>10.70</td>
            <td>10.15</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>4</td>
            <td>12.25</td>
            <td>11.20</td>
            <td>10.40</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>6</td>
            <td>14.35</td>
            <td>12.15</td>
            <td>11.45</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>8</td>
            <td>20.20</td>
            <td>19.90</td>
            <td>18.30</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>10</td>
            <td>25.55</td>
            <td>24.20</td>
            <td>23.40</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>

      <p>Destructive sampling method was adopted to collect the wood samples across the different ages. Twelve trees per age was taken and averaged.</p>
      <sec id="S2a">
        <title>Estimation of anatomical properties</title>
        <p>Three samples each of dimension 2 x 2 x 2 cm were sliced from the heartwood and sapwood regions of <italic>Neolamarckia cadamba. </italic>Thin microscopic sections(15 to 20 µm thick) were exampled using a <italic>'Leica </italic>SM 2000 R Microtome'. Measurement of various parameters was done using the Motic software.</p>
        <p><bold>Fibre length, Diameter, Cell wall thickness </bold>was measured from macerated wood samples by measuring both ends of the fibre using Motic Image Analysis Software.</p>
      </sec>

    </sec>

    <sec id="S3">
      <title>RESULTS</title>
      <p><bold><xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>: Fiber morphology of <italic>Neolamarckia cadamba </italic>at different ages</bold></p>
      <table-wrap id="T2">
        <label>Table 2</label>
        <table>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td>Age</td>
            <td>Fibre Morphology</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Fibre length (µm)</td>
            <td>Fibre diameter (µm)</td>
            <td>Fibre lumen width (µm)</td>
            <td>Fibre wall thickness (µm)</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>2</td>
            <td>1509.00</td>
            <td>40.55</td>
            <td>29.20</td>
            <td>5.64</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>4</td>
            <td>1463.25</td>
            <td>41.43</td>
            <td>29.15</td>
            <td>6.13</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>6</td>
            <td>1781.88</td>
            <td>44.56</td>
            <td>32.78</td>
            <td>5.87</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>8</td>
            <td>1758.43</td>
            <td>41.69</td>
            <td>30.10</td>
            <td>5.82</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>10</td>
            <td>1854.16</td>
            <td>43.47</td>
            <td>26.26</td>
            <td>8.67</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Mean</td>
            <td>1673.34</td>
            <td>42.34</td>
            <td>29.49</td>
            <td>6.42</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>SD</td>
            <td>165.77</td>
            <td>1.62</td>
            <td>2.31</td>
            <td>1.24</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>SEd</td>
            <td>51.01</td>
            <td>0.95</td>
            <td>0.91</td>
            <td>0.26</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>CD (p=0.05)</td>
            <td>101.74</td>
            <td>1.89</td>
            <td>1.81</td>
            <td>0.53</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>

      <p><xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>: Axial variation of fiber morphology of <italic>Neolamarckia cadamba </italic>wood at different ages (replicates of four)</p>
      <table-wrap id="T3">
        <label>Table 3</label>
        <table>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td>Age</td>
            <td>Axial position</td>
            <td>Fibre Morphology</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Fibre length (µm)</td>
            <td>Fibre diameter (µm)</td>
            <td>Fibre lumen width (µm)</td>
            <td>Fibre wall thickness (µm)</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>2</td>
            <td>Base</td>
            <td>1647.50</td>
            <td>41.97</td>
            <td>30.25</td>
            <td>5.90</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Middle</td>
            <td>1555.75</td>
            <td>41.06</td>
            <td>29.47</td>
            <td>5.86</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Top</td>
            <td>1323.75</td>
            <td>38.63</td>
            <td>27.88</td>
            <td>5.15</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Mean</td>
            <td>1509.00</td>
            <td>40.55</td>
            <td>29.20</td>
            <td>5.64</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>SD</td>
            <td>166.77</td>
            <td>1.75</td>
            <td>1.19</td>
            <td>0.42</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>SEd</td>
            <td>61.67</td>
            <td>2.17</td>
            <td>1.51</td>
            <td>0.64</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>CD (p=0.05)</td>
            <td>134.38</td>
            <td>NS</td>
            <td>NS</td>
            <td>NS</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>4</td>
            <td>Base</td>
            <td>1573.85</td>
            <td>42.63</td>
            <td>30.49</td>
            <td>6.00</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Middle</td>
            <td>1446.25</td>
            <td>41.08</td>
            <td>29.20</td>
            <td>5.92</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Top</td>
            <td>1369.65</td>
            <td>40.59</td>
            <td>27.75</td>
            <td>6.46</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Mean</td>
            <td>1463.25</td>
            <td>41.43</td>
            <td>29.15</td>
            <td>6.13</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>SD</td>
            <td>104.07</td>
            <td>1.06</td>
            <td>1.37</td>
            <td>0.29</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>SEd</td>
            <td>40.11</td>
            <td>1.72</td>
            <td>1.68</td>
            <td>0.32</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>CD (p=0.05)</td>
            <td>87.40</td>
            <td>NS</td>
            <td>NS</td>
            <td>NS</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>6</td>
            <td>Base</td>
            <td>1909.55</td>
            <td>45.58</td>
            <td>33.50</td>
            <td>6.09</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Middle</td>
            <td>1808.50</td>
            <td>44.42</td>
            <td>32.99</td>
            <td>5.65</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Top</td>
            <td>1627.59</td>
            <td>43.68</td>
            <td>31.84</td>
            <td>5.88</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Mean</td>
            <td>1781.88</td>
            <td>44.56</td>
            <td>32.78</td>
            <td>5.87</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>SD</td>
            <td>143.94</td>
            <td>0.97</td>
            <td>0.84</td>
            <td>0.22</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>SEd</td>
            <td>72.03</td>
            <td>1.53</td>
            <td>1.65</td>
            <td>0.48</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>CD (p=0.05)</td>
            <td>156.94</td>
            <td>NS</td>
            <td>NS</td>
            <td>NS</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>

      <table-wrap id="T4">
        <label>Table 4</label>
        <table>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td>8</td>
            <td>Base</td>
            <td>1867.14</td>
            <td>42.54</td>
            <td>31.94</td>
            <td>5.92</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Middle</td>
            <td>1780.54</td>
            <td>42.18</td>
            <td>29.91</td>
            <td>5.78</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Top</td>
            <td>1627.60</td>
            <td>40.33</td>
            <td>28.44</td>
            <td>5.75</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Mean</td>
            <td>1758.43</td>
            <td>41.69</td>
            <td>30.10</td>
            <td>5.82</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>SD</td>
            <td>120.33</td>
            <td>1.17</td>
            <td>1.76</td>
            <td>0.09</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>SEd</td>
            <td>3.46</td>
            <td>1.05</td>
            <td>1.36</td>
            <td>0.47</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>CD (p=0.05)</td>
            <td>116.48</td>
            <td>NS</td>
            <td>NS</td>
            <td>NS</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>10</td>
            <td>Base</td>
            <td>1963.29</td>
            <td>44.60</td>
            <td>26.93</td>
            <td>9.03</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Middle</td>
            <td>1886.25</td>
            <td>43.48</td>
            <td>26.01</td>
            <td>8.63</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Top</td>
            <td>1712.95</td>
            <td>42.32</td>
            <td>25.83</td>
            <td>8.37</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Mean</td>
            <td>1854.16</td>
            <td>43.47</td>
            <td>26.26</td>
            <td>8.67</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>SD</td>
            <td>126.22</td>
            <td>1.14</td>
            <td>0.59</td>
            <td>0.33</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>SEd</td>
            <td>45.43</td>
            <td>1.43</td>
            <td>1.50</td>
            <td>0.39</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>CD (p=0.05)</td>
            <td>98.99</td>
            <td>NS</td>
            <td>NS</td>
            <td>NS</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>

      <p>The fibre morphology of <italic>Neolamarckia cadamba </italic>exhibited significant variation across different ages (2–10 years), particularly in fibre length, diameter, lumen width and wall thickness (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). Fibre length ranged from 1463.25 µm at 4 years to 1854.16 µm at 10 years, showing an overall increasing trend with age despite minor fluctuations. The increase was more pronounced from 6 years onward, indicating enhanced fibre development during later growth stages. Fibre diameter also showed a gradual increase with age, reaching a maximum of 44.56 µm at 6 years before slightly declining at older ages. The statistical analysis (CD = 1.89) confirms significant differences among age classes (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>).122ibre lumen width initially increased from 29.20 µm at 2 years to 32.78 µm at 6 years, followed by a decline to 26.26 µm at 10 years, suggesting increased secondary wall deposition in older wood. In contrast, fibre wall thickness showed a clear increasing trend, particularly at 10 years (8.67 µm), indicating strengthening of fibres with maturity. All these variations were statistically significant, highlighting the influence of age on fibre characteristics (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>).Axial variation within the tree revealed a consistent pattern across all ages (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). Fibre length was highest at the base and lowest at the top, with significant differences observed along the stem. For instance, at 6 years, fibre length decreased from 1909.55 µm at the base to 1627.59 µm at the top,  reflecting the maturity gradient along the stem. However, fibre diameter, lumen width and wall thickness did not show significant axial variation (NS), although numerically they tended to decrease from base to top (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p>
    </sec>

    <sec id="S4">
      <title>DISCUSSIONS Fibre length</title>
      <p>Fibre length is a critical property influencing fibre bonding and strength, as longer fibres form stronger networks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R7">Johansson, 2011</xref>). In the present study, fibre length ranged from 1463.25 µm to 1854.16 µm, with values at 6, 8 and 10 years not significantly different. Although no strict linear trend was observed, fibre length generally increased with age. The values recorded were higher than several species such as <italic>Eucalyptus camaldulensis </italic>(670 µm) and <italic>Eucalyptus globulus </italic>(716 µm) and <italic>Melia dubia </italic>(936.60 µm) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R12">Saravanan et al., 2013</xref>), <italic>Albizzia chinensis </italic>(1147 µm) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R1">Darmawan et al., 2013</xref>) and young teak wood (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R15">Wahyudi et al., 2014</xref>). Axially, fibre length varied significantly, decreasing from base to top, consistent with findings in <italic>Ricinodendron heudelotii </italic>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R11">Ogunleye, 2017</xref>), <italic>Moringa oleifera </italic>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R2">Ekhuemelo et al., 2016</xref>) and <italic>Eucalyptus tereticornis </italic>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R14">Uniyal, 2012</xref>).</p>
      <sec id="S4a">
        <title>Fibre diameter</title>
        <p>Fibre diameter increased gradually with age, indicating enhanced cell development in older wood. Similar trends were reported in <italic>Afzelia africana </italic>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R5">Idu and Ijomah, 1996</xref>). However, axial variation was non- significant, though diameter decreased slightly from base to top. This may be attributed to reduced photosynthate availability at upper stem portions, affecting cell development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R6">Ismail et al., 1995</xref>).</p>
      </sec>

      <sec id="S4b">
        <title>Fibre lumen width and wall thickness</title>
        <p>Fibre lumen width (26.26–32.78 µm) and wall thickness (5.64–8.67 µm) varied significantly with age but without a clear trend. Increased wall thickness with age has been reported in <italic>Eucalyptus </italic>clones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R4">Grzeskowiak <italic>et al.</italic>, 2000</xref>), while a strong relationship between fibre width and wall thickness was noted in <italic>Quercus suber </italic>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R8">Leal <italic>et al.</italic>, 2006</xref>). Similar patterns were observed in <italic>Ricinodendron heudelotii </italic>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R11">Ogunleye <italic>et al.</italic>, 2017</xref>) and <italic>Azadirachta excelsa </italic>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R10">Nordahlia <italic>et al.</italic>, 2014</xref>). These variations may be linked to cambial age and physiological development (Moya Roque <italic>et al.</italic>, 2007).</p>
      </sec>

    </sec>

    <sec id="S5">
      <title>CONCLUSION</title>
      <p>The present study demonstrated that fibre morphology of <italic>Neolamarckia cadamba </italic>is significantly influenced by age, with comparatively lesser variation along the axial positions of the stem. Fibre length, diameter and wall thickness generally increased with age, indicating progressive maturation and improved mechanical strength of wood. In contrast, fibre lumen width showed variable trends, reflecting changes in cell development and wall deposition. Axial variation revealed that fibre length decreased from base to top, while other parameters remained statistically non- significant, suggesting relative uniformity within the stem. The results indicate that intermediate ages (6–8 years) provide a balance between fibre strength and desirable processing characteristics. <italic>N. cadamba </italic>exhibits favourable anatomical properties suitable for pulp, paper and other wood-based industries.</p>
    </sec>

    <fig id="fig1">
      <label>Figure 1</label>
      <caption><p>Figure 1: Fibre morphology vs Age (Dual axis graph)</p></caption>
      <graphic xlink:href="https://www.acspublisher.com/journals/index.php/ija/article/download/25182/version/24621/21759/48563/figure1.jpg"/>
    </fig>

  </body>

  <back>

    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>

      <ref id="R1">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Darmawan</surname><given-names>W., Nandika, D., Rahayu, I., Fournier, M</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Marchal</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Determination of juvenile and mature transition ring for fast-growing sengon and jabon wood. <italic>Journal of the Indian Academy of Wood Science, 10</italic>(1), 39–47</article-title>
          <year>2013</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R2">
        <element-citation publication-type="book-chapter">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Ekhuemelo</surname><given-names>D. O</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Udo</surname><given-names>A. M</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Investigation of variations in the fibre characteristics of <italic>Moringa oleifera</italic> Lam. stem for pulp and paper production. <italic>International Journal of Science and Technology, 5</italic>(1), 19–25</article-title>
          <year>2016</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R3">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Ghosh</surname><given-names>R. C</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title><italic>Handbook of afforestation techniques</italic></article-title>
          <source>Controller of Publications</source>
          <year>1977</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R4">
        <element-citation publication-type="conference">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Grzeskowiak,</surname><given-names>V., Turner, P., &amp; Megown, R. A. (</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <year>2000</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R5">
        <element-citation publication-type="book-chapter">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Idu</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Ijomah</surname><given-names>J. U</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Wood anatomy of some savanna Fabaceae species: III</article-title>
          <source>Dimensional variation in fibre and vessel elements of &lt;italic&gt;Afzelia africana&lt;/italic&gt; Sm</source>
          <year>1996</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R6">
        <element-citation publication-type="book-chapter">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Ismail</surname><given-names>J., Jusoh, M. Z</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Sahri</surname><given-names>M. H</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Anatomical variation in planted kelempayan (<italic>Neolamarckia cadamba</italic>, Rubiaceae). <italic>IAWA Journal, 16</italic>(3), 227–287</article-title>
          <year>1995</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R7">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Johansson</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title><italic>Correlations between fibre properties and paper properties</italic></article-title>
          <year>2011</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R8">
        <element-citation publication-type="book-chapter">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Leal</surname><given-names>S., Sousa, V. B</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Pereira</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Within- and between-tree variation in the biometry of wood rays and fibres in cork oak (<italic>Quercus suber</italic> L.). <italic>Wood Science and Technology, 40</italic>(7), 585–597</article-title>
          <year>2006</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R9">
        <element-citation publication-type="book-chapter">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Moya Roque</surname><given-names>R., Tomazello Filho, M</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Canessa Amador</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Fiber morphology in fast-growth <italic>Gmelina arborea</italic> plantations. <italic>Madera y Bosques, 13</italic>(2), 3–13</article-title>
          <year>2007</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R10">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Nordahlia</surname><given-names>A. S., Anwar, U. M. K., Hamdan, H., Zaidon, A</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Omar</surname><given-names>M. M</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Mechanical properties of 10-year-old sentang (<italic>Azadirachta excelsa</italic>) grown from vegetative propagation. <italic>Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 26</italic>, 240–248</article-title>
          <year>2014</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R11">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Ogunleye</surname><given-names>B. M., Fuwape, J. A., Oluyege, A. O., Ajayi, B</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Fabiyi</surname><given-names>J. S</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Evaluation of fiber characteristics of <italic>Ricinodendron heudelotii</italic> (Baill., Pierre ex Pax) for pulp and paper making. <italic>International Journal of Science and Technology, 6</italic>(1), 634–641</article-title>
          <year>2017</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R12">
        <element-citation publication-type="book-chapter">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Saravanan</surname><given-names>V., Parthiban, K. T., Sekar, I., Kumar, P</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Vennila</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Radial variations in anatomical properties of <italic>Melia dubia</italic> Cav. at five different ages. <italic>Scientific Research and Essays, 8</italic>(45), 2208–2217</article-title>
          <year>2013</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R13">
        <element-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Soerianegara</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Lemmens</surname><given-names>R. H. M. J</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title><italic>Plant resources of South-East Asia No. 5(1): Timber trees: Major commercial timbers</italic></article-title>
          <source>Pudoc Scientific Publishers</source>
          <year>1993</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R14">
        <element-citation publication-type="book-chapter">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Uniyal</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title><italic>Variation in wood anatomical properties and specific gravity in Eucalyptus tereticornis Sm.</italic> (Doctoral dissertation)</article-title>
          <source>Forest Research Institute University</source>
          <year>2012</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R15">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Wahyudi</surname><given-names>I., Priadi, T</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Rahayu</surname><given-names>I. S</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Karakteristik dan sifat-sifat dasar kayu jati unggul umur 4 dan 5 tahun asal Jawa Barat [Characteristics and basic properties of 4- and 5-year-old superior teakwoods from West Java]. <italic>Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia, 19</italic>(1), 50–56</article-title>
          <year>2014</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

    </ref-list>

  </back>

</article>
