<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN"
  "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.2">

  <front>

    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJA</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Indian Journal of Agroforestry</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">Indian Journal of Agroforestry</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2456-6489</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>ACS Publisher</publisher-name>
        <publisher-loc>India</publisher-loc>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>

    <article-meta>

      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.48165/ija.2026.28.01.08</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>

      <title-group>
        <article-title>Economics Feasibility of Okra - Ailanthus Based Silvi- Horticultural System in South Gujarat</article-title>
      </title-group>

      <contrib-group>

        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" id="AU1">
          <name>
            <surname>Mevada</surname>
            <given-names>R J</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
          <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="COR1"><sup>*</sup></xref>
        </contrib>

        <contrib contrib-type="author" id="AU2">
          <name>
            <surname>Nayak</surname>
            <given-names>Dileswar</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
        </contrib>

        <contrib contrib-type="author" id="AU3">
          <name>
            <surname>Viyol</surname>
            <given-names>S V</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
        </contrib>

        <contrib contrib-type="author" id="AU4">
          <name>
            <surname>pampaniya</surname>
            <given-names>N K</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
        </contrib>

        <contrib contrib-type="author" id="AU5">
          <name>
            <surname>Balas</surname>
            <given-names>Duda B</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
        </contrib>

        <contrib contrib-type="author" id="AU6">
          <name>
            <surname>Patel</surname>
            <given-names>D P</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
        </contrib>

        <contrib contrib-type="author" id="AU7">
          <name>
            <surname>Surve</surname>
            <given-names>Nilam</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
        </contrib>

      </contrib-group>

      <aff id="aff1">
        <label>1</label>
        <institution>Department of Forest Resource Management, College of Forestry, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari- 396 450</institution>
      </aff>

      <aff id="aff2">
        <label>2</label>
        <institution>School of Environmental Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University. New Mehrauli Road, New Delhi-110067</institution>
      </aff>

      <author-notes>
        <corresp id="COR1">
          <label>*</label>
          E-mail: <email>rammevada7600@gmail.com</email>
        </corresp>
      </author-notes>

      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>

      <volume>28</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>66</fpage>
      <lpage>70</lpage>
      <issue-title>January-March</issue-title>

      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>9</day>
          <month>6</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>31</day>
          <month>12</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
      </history>

      <permissions>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
        <copyright-holder>ACS Publisher Journal</copyright-holder>
      </permissions>

      <abstract>
        <p>To evaluate the economic feasibility of okra cultivars under various land use regimes (under Ailanthus excelsa and in open condition), a field experiment was conducted in 2022–2023 and 2023–2024. The four varieties of okra i.e., Ajeet, Roshni, Sona-55 and Navsari okra, designated as V1, V2, V3 and V4, respectively, were grown beneath the five year old A. excelsa and in the open conditions. A randomized block design with four replications was used to create this experiment. According to the experiment's projected economics, growing the Sona-55 variety of okra under A. excelsa (V3 + A. excelsa) had the highest BC ratio (3.76) among the various land use systems. However, in a solo condition (V1 sole), the Ajeet variety of okra was reported to have a net realization maximum (Rs. 218,623 ha⁻¹). Therefore, the Sona-55 okra variety under A. excelsa has the potential to produce more revenue than the other land use systems.</p>
      </abstract>

      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
        <title>Keywords</title>
        <kwd>Ailanthus excelsa</kwd>
        <kwd>Agroforestry</kwd>
        <kwd>BCR</kwd>
        <kwd>Net Realization</kwd>
      </kwd-group>

      <funding-group>
        <funding-statement>No specific funding was received for this study.</funding-statement>
      </funding-group>

    </article-meta>
  </front>

  <body>

    <sec id="S1">
      <title>INTRODUCTION</title>
      <p>An agroforestry system is among the most economically significant of the various agriculture- integrated techniques, particularly when long-term benefits both tangible and intangible are taken into account (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R4">Elbakidze <italic>et al., </italic>2021</xref>). Despite this, farmers may have to deal with the difficulties of early investment, delayed profits, and risk diversification compared to traditional agriculture alone. The majority of farmers and agribusiness owners take the advantages of agricultural practices extremely seriously. As a result, economics plays a vital role in determining decisions made by governments, institutions, communities, and people. Agroforestry is widely regarded as a sustainable business and a way to address environmental issues, especially for farmers with few resources (Mahmud <italic>et al., </italic>2020).</p>
      <p><italic>Ailanthus excelsa </italic>is a deciduous tree species that grows quickly and is native to India. It is a member of the Simaroubaceae family and yields long-term returns from wood that is collected six to eight years later. It is also called Maharukh or Tree of Heaven. It grows well in dry and semi-arid areas and is commonly utilized in afforestation, social forestry, and agroforestry initiatives (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R17">Terzopoulou <italic>et al., </italic>2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R10">Lavhale and Mishra 2007</xref>). It is highly valued economically for its lightweight, termite-resistant wood, which is widely utilized in the pulp, plywood, matchstick, and packing box sectors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R7">Kaushik <italic>et al., </italic>2017</xref>). Whereas, Okra (<italic>Abelmoschus esculentus</italic>), commonly referred to as lady's finger or bhindi, is a member of the Malvaceae family and is widely grown in tropical and subtropical areas, particularly in Nigeria, Sudan, and India. The warm- season vegetable crop, which is valued for its tender green pods that appear within two to three months, is widely farmed by farmers due to its market demand and nutritional quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R11">Mevada <italic>et al., </italic>2023</xref>). As a result, both the <italic>A. excelsa </italic>tree and the vegetable product okra have the potential to increase demand and revenue. Thus, the economic assessment of okra - <italic>A. excelsa </italic>based silvi-horticulture systems in this work emphasizes their potential as a sustainable and lucrative land-use paradigm, especially in marginal and dryland areas. This integrated system makes it possible to grow okra for short-term revenue and reap long-term benefits from <italic>A. excelsa</italic>. For smallholder farmers, the method is both environmentally sustainable and economically viable thanks to this dual-income approach. Because cacao agroforestry systems in Costa Rica offer shade and reduced input costs, they have demonstrated higher long-term financial returns than monoculture cacao (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R13">Niether <italic>et al., </italic>2020</xref>).</p>
      <p>Farmers in South Gujarat are interested in implementing agroforestry techniques on their properties. According to several studies, farmers in this area have adopted agroforestry techniques and are bringing in extra money (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R2">Deshmukh <italic>et al., </italic>2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R12">Mevada <italic>et al., </italic>2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R3">Dobriyal <italic>et al., </italic>2019</xref>). Farmers find it difficult to estimate the economics of complex agricultural practices, such as agroforestry systems like okra – <italic>A. excelsa </italic>combinations, which necessitate a more thorough economic evaluation than sole cropping because of the multi-component interactions between trees and crops. As a result, the current study was carried out to assess the viability of a silvi-horticultural system based on okra and ailanthus in South Gujarat</p>
    </sec>

    <sec id="S2">
      <title>MATERIAL AND METHODS</title>
      <p><bold>Study site: </bold>The field experiment was conducted during kharif season of 2022-23 and 2023-24, at Forest Resource Management (FRM) Farm, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, Gujarat, India (Figure 1). It is geographically located at 20.95° N latitude and 72.93° E longitude with an elevation of 11 m above mean sea level (AMSL). This area is typically characterized by humid and warm monsoon with average annual rainfall of about 1500-1800mm, moderately cold winter, and fairly hot and humid  summer. The mean annual temperature is 27.1 °C during the study period. <bold>Materials: </bold>For the experiment required seed of okra variety <italic>i.e. </italic>Hybrid Ajeet, Roshni F1, Hybrid Sona-55 were collected from the seed bhandar, Navsari, whereas the one variety of Okra (Navsari okra) collected from Regional Horticultural Research Station, NAU, Navsari.</p>
      <p>Layout and design of the experiment The ailanthus based agroforestry system was laid out in randomized block design with treatments of four okra varieties grown under ailanthus tree and also all these varieties grown in sole condition (Total eight treatments combination) and tested in four replications. Okra was grown at a spacing of 45cm x 30cm. Where, four okra varieties <italic>Viz</italic>; V1: Ajeet, V2: Roshni, V3: Sona-55 and V4: Navsari okra. The existing <italic>Ailanthus excelsa </italic>plantation was planted at the spacing of 5m X 3m in the East- West direction (5 year old plantation).</p>
      <p><bold>Economic Analysis: </bold>Economic estimation of different crops like okra and ailanthus involves assessing costs of production and returns to evaluate profitability, viability, and sustainability. The process typically follows agro- economic analysis standards recommended by institutions. Economic analysis methods such as NPV, IRR, BCR, and sensitivity analysis are essential for assessing the long-term viability of agroforestry systems. In this study BCR method was used for estimate the economics of okra- ailanthus based silvi-horticulture system. The market value for the current year (2024–25) was used to determine the cost of growing <italic>A. excelsa </italic>and okra as well as the selling price of okra fruits and ailanthus wood.</p>
      <p><bold><xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>. Economics of Okra - Ailanthus based silvi-horticultural systems</bold></p>
      <table-wrap id="T1">
        <label>Table 1</label>
        <table>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td>BCR</td>
            <td>Under A. excelsa</td>
            <td>3.39</td>
            <td>2.96</td>
            <td>3.79</td>
            <td>2.95</td>
            <td>4.48</td>
            <td>In open Condition</td>
            <td>3.56</td>
            <td>2.98</td>
            <td>3.04</td>
            <td>2.77</td>
            <td> </td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Net Realization (Rs ha-1)</td>
            <td>156494</td>
            <td>127937</td>
            <td>182410</td>
            <td>127527</td>
            <td>50352</td>
            <td>218623</td>
            <td>168873</td>
            <td>173873</td>
            <td>151373</td>
            <td> </td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Total Cost of Cultivation (Rs ha-1)</td>
            <td>65356</td>
            <td>65356</td>
            <td>65356</td>
            <td>65356</td>
            <td>14449</td>
            <td>85377</td>
            <td>85377</td>
            <td>85377</td>
            <td>85377</td>
            <td> </td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Total Gross Realization (Rs ha-1)</td>
            <td>221850</td>
            <td>193293</td>
            <td>247766</td>
            <td>192883</td>
            <td>64801</td>
            <td>304000</td>
            <td>254250</td>
            <td>259250</td>
            <td>236750</td>
            <td> </td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>A. excelsa</td>
            <td>Gross Realization (Rs ha-1)</td>
            <td>58100</td>
            <td>57043</td>
            <td>62266</td>
            <td>57883</td>
            <td>64801</td>
            <td>-</td>
            <td>-</td>
            <td>-</td>
            <td>-</td>
            <td> </td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Cost (Rs ha-1)</td>
            <td>14449</td>
            <td>14449</td>
            <td>14449</td>
            <td>14449</td>
            <td>14449</td>
            <td>-</td>
            <td>-</td>
            <td>-</td>
            <td>-</td>
            <td> </td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Productivity (t ha-1 year-1)</td>
            <td>11.62</td>
            <td>11.41</td>
            <td>12.45</td>
            <td>11.58</td>
            <td>12.96</td>
            <td>-</td>
            <td>-</td>
            <td>-</td>
            <td>-</td>
            <td> </td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Okra</td>
            <td>Gross Realization</td>
            <td>163750</td>
            <td>136250</td>
            <td>185500</td>
            <td>135000</td>
            <td>-</td>
            <td>304000</td>
            <td>254250</td>
            <td>259250</td>
            <td>236750</td>
            <td> </td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Total Cost (Rs ha-1)</td>
            <td>50907</td>
            <td>50907</td>
            <td>50907</td>
            <td>50907</td>
            <td>-</td>
            <td>85377</td>
            <td>85377</td>
            <td>85377</td>
            <td>85377</td>
            <td> </td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Yield</td>
            <td>6.55</td>
            <td>5.45</td>
            <td>7.42</td>
            <td>5.40</td>
            <td>-</td>
            <td>12.16</td>
            <td>10.17</td>
            <td>10.37</td>
            <td>9.47</td>
            <td>(Rs. 25000/tonne</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Land Use Systems</td>
            <td>V1 + A. excelsa</td>
            <td>V2 + A. excelsa</td>
            <td>V3 + A. excelsa</td>
            <td>V4 + A. excelsa</td>
            <td>A. excelsa Sole</td>
            <td>V1</td>
            <td>V2</td>
            <td>V3</td>
            <td>V4</td>
            <td>Price rate : Okra rate</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>

    </sec>

    <sec id="S3">
      <title>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</title>
      <p>Economics has a key role in determining whether the system is lucrative or not. Consequently, the economics of the implemented systems were computed and displayed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>. It can be shown from the systems' calculated economics that the several okra kinds under the A. excelsa tree and in open conditions are the most investigated. It turns out that when okra varieties were cultivated in an open environment, the V1 variety (Ajeet) had the highest BCR (3.56:1) and net realization (Rs. 218623 ha-1) of all the kinds. With the exception of the Ajeet variety, all okra types cultivated in an ailanthus- based silvi-horticulture system showed higher BCR than those produced in an open environment. Under an ailanthus-based silvi-horticulture system, the sona-55 okra variety (V3 + <italic>A. excelsa</italic>) showed the highest BC</p>
      <p><xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>. Cultivations cost of okra in open condition and under <italic>A. excelsa</italic></p>
      <table-wrap id="T2">
        <label>Table 2</label>
        <table>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td>Description</td>
            <td>Rate</td>
            <td>Open (Rs. ha-1)</td>
            <td>Afs (Rs. ha-1)</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Preparatory tillage</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Ploughing by tractor with (1time) M.B. plough</td>
            <td>Rs.600 per hr for 8 hours</td>
            <td>4800.0</td>
            <td>2880.0</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Ploughing by tractor with (2 times) cultivator</td>
            <td>Rs.500 per hr for 6 hours</td>
            <td>6000.0</td>
            <td>3600.0</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Ploughing by tractor with (1 times) Rotavator with planking</td>
            <td>Rs.800 per hr for 4 hours</td>
            <td>3200.0</td>
            <td>1920.0</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Total</td>
            <td>14000.0</td>
            <td>8400.0</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Lay out and Transplanting</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Layout ,Preparation of channel, beds and earthing up (8 labour in open and 5 labours in AF for 2 days)</td>
            <td>Rs.399 per labour per day</td>
            <td>6384.0</td>
            <td>4788.0</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Seed requires (4.5 kg/ha in open and 2.5 kg/ha in AFs)</td>
            <td>Rs.1500 per kg</td>
            <td>6750.0</td>
            <td>4050.0</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Sowing (18 labours in open and 15 labours in AFs for 1 days)</td>
            <td>Rs.399 per labour per day</td>
            <td>7182.0</td>
            <td>4788.0</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Gap filling (8 labours in open and 5 labours in AFs for 1 days)</td>
            <td>Rs.399 per labour per day</td>
            <td>3192.0</td>
            <td>1995.0</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Total</td>
            <td>23508.0</td>
            <td>15621.0</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Manures</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>FYM (15 t/ha in open and 9 t/ha in AFs)</td>
            <td>Rs. 1000 per tonne</td>
            <td>15000.0</td>
            <td>9000.0</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>DAP (312.5 kg/ha in open and 187.5 kg/ha in AFs)</td>
            <td>Rs. 9 per kg</td>
            <td>3250.0</td>
            <td>1950.0</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Urea (83.33 kg/ha in open and 50 kg/ha in AFs)</td>
            <td>Rs. 15 per kg</td>
            <td>1200.0</td>
            <td>720.0</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Expenditure on manures application</td>
            <td>Rs. 200 per tonne of FYM</td>
            <td>3000.0</td>
            <td>1800.0</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Expenditure on fertilizer application (6 labours for 1 day)</td>
            <td>Rs.399 per labour per day</td>
            <td>2394.0</td>
            <td>1436.4</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Total</td>
            <td> </td>
            <td>24844.0</td>
            <td>14906.4</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Intercultural operations</td>
            <td> </td>
            <td> </td>
            <td> </td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Weeding (two times in Open and one time in Afs) (8 labours in open and 5 labours in AFs per weeding)</td>
            <td>Rs.399 per labour per day</td>
            <td>6384.0</td>
            <td>1995.0</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Total</td>
            <td>6384.0</td>
            <td>1995.0</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Irrigation application</td>
            <td> </td>
            <td> </td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Electric Charge for 5 Irrigations in open and 3 irrigations in AFs)</td>
            <td>Rs. 30 per hour</td>
            <td>3000.0</td>
            <td>1800.0</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Labour charges (2 men for 1 irrigation)</td>
            <td>Rs.399 per labour per day</td>
            <td>3990.0</td>
            <td>2394.0</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Total</td>
            <td>6990.0</td>
            <td>4194.0</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Plant protection</td>
            <td> </td>
            <td> </td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Labour for spraying (2 men per spray)</td>
            <td>Rs.399 per labour per day</td>
            <td>1596.0</td>
            <td>957.6</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Pendimethalin (Pre-emergance Weedicide @1 lit/ha)</td>
            <td>Rs. 475 per Liter</td>
            <td>475.0</td>
            <td>285.0</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Quizalofop-ethyl 10% EC (Post-emergance Weedicide @500 ml /ha)</td>
            <td>Rs. 850 per 500ml</td>
            <td>850.0</td>
            <td>510.0</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Total</td>
            <td> </td>
            <td>2071.0</td>
            <td>1242.6</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Harvesting</td>
            <td> </td>
            <td> </td>
            <td> </td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Fruit harvest (16 picking) (4 labours in open and 3 labours in AFs per picking)</td>
            <td>Rs.399 per labour per day</td>
            <td>25536.0</td>
            <td>19152.0</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Uprooting the plants (5 labours in open and 3 labours in AFs for 1 day)</td>
            <td>Rs.399 per labour per day</td>
            <td>1995.0</td>
            <td>1197.0</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Total</td>
            <td>1995.0</td>
            <td>1197.0</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Grand Total</td>
            <td>79792.0</td>
            <td>47556.0</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Interest on working capital @ 7 %</td>
            <td>5585.4</td>
            <td>3351.3</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Gross total</td>
            <td>85377.4</td>
            <td>50907.3</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>

      <p><xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>. Cultivations cost of <italic>A. excelsa</italic></p>
      <table-wrap id="T3">
        <label>Table 3</label>
        <table>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td>Operations</td>
            <td>Cost tree-1</td>
            <td>Total cost (Rs. ha-1)</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Cost of Planting (Planting Material, Preparation of Pits, Planting)</td>
            <td>Rs. 7.5</td>
            <td>5000.00</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>i.e. ha year-1</td>
            <td>1000.00</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>FYM</td>
            <td>Rs. 1</td>
            <td>133.33</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Urea</td>
            <td>Rs. 2</td>
            <td>266.66</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>SSP</td>
            <td>Rs. 1</td>
            <td>133.33</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Weeding and cleaning (10 labours 2 times per year)</td>
            <td>Rs.399 per labour per day</td>
            <td>7980.00</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Pruning (10 labours 1 times per year)</td>
            <td>Rs.399 per labour per day</td>
            <td>3990.00</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Total</td>
            <td> </td>
            <td>13503.33</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Interest on working capital @ 7 %</td>
            <td> </td>
            <td>945.23</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Gross Total</td>
            <td> </td>
            <td>14448.56</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>

      <p>ratio (3.79: 1) and net realization (Rs. 182410 ha-1) compared to other varieties. The V4 variety of okra had the lowest net realization and BCR among the intercrops, measuring Rs. 127527 ha-1and 2.95:1, respectively. In contrast to the ailanthus-based silvi- horticulture system, the open condition's increased growth and yield parameters are likely the cause of the highest net realization (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). The lower expense of the <italic>A. excelsa </italic>plantation and the higher return from the systems may be the reasons for the BCR ratio was at its highest with the V3 type of ok okra. The Sona-55 okra variety outperformed the other kinds under the <italic>A. excelsa</italic>. Similar outcomes were seen in okra under <italic>Litchi chinensis</italic>, which was previously reported by Hanif <italic>et al. </italic>(2010), Kumar <italic>et al. </italic>(2016) in <italic>Ocimum spp. </italic>under <italic>Tectona grandis</italic>, Rajalingam <italic>et al. </italic>(2016) in vegetable crops under <italic>Ailanthus excelsa</italic>, Kazi <italic>et al. </italic>(2017) in colocasia under <italic>Borassus flabellifer</italic>, Bhusara <italic>et al. </italic>(2018) in okra under <italic>Melia composita</italic>, Patel <italic>et al. </italic>(2018) in cucurbitaceous vegetable crops under <italic>Tectona grandis</italic>, Jilariya <italic>et al. </italic>(2019) in <italic>Aloe vera </italic>under <italic>Melia dubia </italic>and Mevada <italic>et al. </italic>(2022) in okra under <italic>Tectona grandis.</italic></p>
      <p>The projected variable cost of growing okra was calculated on the basis of one hector area of okra under <italic>A. excelsa </italic>trees and in open spaces shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>. Additionally, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref> presents the several variable particles that were used to evaluate the plantation cost and variable management cost of <italic>A. excelsa</italic>.</p>
    </sec>

    <sec id="S4">
      <title>CONCLUSION</title>
      <p>According to the estimated economics of several varieties of okra under different land use systems shown above, the Sona-55 variety of okra grown under</p>
      <p><italic>A. excelsa </italic>produced the highest BC ratio when compared to the other systems. However, in solitary condition, the Ajeet variety of okra showed the highest net realization, followed by the Sona-55 variety under <italic>A. excelsa</italic>. Thus, growing the sona-55 variety of okra with <italic>A. excelsa </italic>has the potential to produce more revenue than the other land use systems.</p>
    </sec>

    <sec id="S5">
      <title>Acknowledgement</title>
      <p>The experiment was funded through the plant project “Strategies to mitigate the impact of climate change” sponsored by Government of Gujarat, India. Authors are highly acknowledged the facility provided during the study at Navsari Agricultural University, India.</p>
    </sec>

    <sec id="S6">
      <title>Declarations</title>
      <p>On behalf of all Co-Authors, I shall bear full responsibility for the submission. I confirm that all authors listed on the title page have contributed significantly to the work, have read the manuscript, attest to the validity and legitimacy of the data and its interpretation, and agree to its submission. It is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.</p>
    </sec>

    <sec id="S7">
      <title>Conflict of interest</title>
      <p>The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.</p>
    </sec>

  </body>

  <back>

    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>

      <ref id="R1">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Bhusara</surname><given-names>J. B., Dobriyal, M. J., Thakur, N. S., Gunaga, R. P</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Tandel</surname><given-names>M. B</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Performance of okra (<italic>Abelmoschus esculentus</italic> L</article-title>
          <source>Moench) under different spatial arrangements of &lt;italic&gt;Melia composita&lt;/italic&gt; based agroforestry system. &lt;italic&gt;International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences</source>
          <year>2018</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R2">
        <element-citation publication-type="book-chapter">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Deshmukh</surname><given-names>H., Dobriyal, M., Tandel, M. B., Gunaga, R., Sharma, O. P., Garde, Y. A., Thakare, U., Kunwar, R., Chavan, S., Salunkhe, S., Thakur, N. S., Singh, N., Chinchmalatpure, U</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Mevada</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Development and standardization of an innovative scale for measuring the socio-economic status of agroforestry farmers in South Gujarat, India. <italic>Sustainability, 15</italic>, 2691</article-title>
          <year>2023</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R3">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Dobriyal</surname><given-names>M. J., Husain, M., Prajapati, V. M</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Jilariya</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Agroforestry models of South Gujarat. <italic>Flora and Fauna, 25</italic>(2), 137–139</article-title>
          <year>2019</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R4">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Elbakidze</surname><given-names>M., Surová, D., Muñoz-Rojas, J., Persson, J. O., Dawson, L., Plieninger, T</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Pinto-Correia</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Perceived benefits from agroforestry landscapes across North-Eastern Europe: What matters and for whom? <italic>Landscape and Urban Planning, 209</italic>, 104044</article-title>
          <year>2021</year>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104044</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R5">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Hanif</surname><given-names>M. A., Amin, M. H. A., Bari, M. S., Ali, M. S</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Uddin</surname><given-names>M. N</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Performance of okra under litchi-based agroforestry system. <italic>Journal of Agroforestry and Environment, 4</italic>(2), 137–139</article-title>
          <year>2010</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R6">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Jilariya</surname><given-names>D. J., Thakur, N. S., Singh, N</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Gunaga</surname><given-names>R. P</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Economics of cultivation of <italic>Melia dubia</italic> L</article-title>
          <source>Cav.–&lt;italic&gt;Aloe vera&lt;/italic&gt; silvi-medicinal model. &lt;italic&gt;Indian Journal of Agroforestry</source>
          <year>2019</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R7">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Kaushik</surname><given-names>N., Vikram</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Chhabra</surname><given-names>A. K</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Genetic divergence analysis in <italic>Ailanthus excelsa</italic> based on morphological traits. <italic>Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 87</italic>(2), 173–178</article-title>
          <year>2017</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R8">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Kazi</surname><given-names>A. A., Tandel, M. B., Pathak, J. G</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Prajapati</surname><given-names>D. H</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Potentiality of colocasia intercrop under naturally occurring Palmyra palm (<italic>Borassus flabellifer</italic> L.). <italic>Journal of Tree Science, 36</italic>(1), 58–61</article-title>
          <year>2017</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R9">
        <element-citation publication-type="book-chapter">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>M., Thakur, N. S</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Hegde</surname><given-names>H. T</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Fresh herb, essential oil yield and net returns from <italic>Ocimum</italic> spp. grown under teak (<italic>Tectona grandis</italic> L.f.) based silvi-medicinal systems in South Gujarat. <italic>Indian Journal of Ecology, 43</italic>(1), 306–311</article-title>
          <year>2016</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R10">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Lavhale</surname><given-names>M. S</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Mishra</surname><given-names>S. H</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Nutritional and therapeutic potential of <italic>Ailanthus excelsa</italic>: A review. <italic>Pharmacognosy Reviews, 1</italic>, 105–113</article-title>
          <year>2007</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R11">
        <element-citation publication-type="book-chapter">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Mevada</surname><given-names>R. J., Tandel, M. B</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Patel</surname><given-names>N. K</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Effect of integrated nitrogen management on growth and yield of okra (<italic>Abelmoschus esculentus</italic>) under teak (<italic>Tectona grandis</italic>) based silvi-horticulture system in South Gujarat. <italic>Indian Journal of Agroforestry, 25</italic>(1), 28–33</article-title>
          <year>2023</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R12">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Mevada</surname><given-names>R. J., Tandel, M. B., Prajapati, V. M</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Patel</surname><given-names>N. K</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Economic perspective of integrated nitrogen management under teak (<italic>Tectona grandis</italic> L.f.)–okra (<italic>Abelmoschus esculentus</italic> L.) based silvi-horticulture system. <italic>Indian Journal of Ecology, 49</italic>(5), 1719–1723</article-title>
          <year>2022</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R13">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Niether</surname><given-names>W., Jacobi, J., Blaser, W. J., Andres, C</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Armengot</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Cocoa agroforestry systems versus monocultures: A multi-dimensional meta-analysis. <italic>Environmental Research Letters, 15</italic>, 104085</article-title>
          <year>2020</year>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1748-9326/abb053</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R14">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Panwar</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Wani</surname><given-names>A. M</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Effect of organic production on growth and productivity of sweet potato (<italic>Ipomoea batatas</italic> L.) under poplar-based agroforestry system. <italic>International Journal of Advanced Research, 2</italic>(12), 229–232</article-title>
          <year>2014</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R15">
        <element-citation publication-type="book-chapter">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Patel</surname><given-names>S. M., Tandel, M. B., Desai, M. K., Pathak, J. G., Behera, L. K</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Parmar</surname><given-names>M. R</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Economics of cucurbitaceous vegetable crops under teak (<italic>Tectona grandis</italic> L.f.) based silvi-horticultural system in South Gujarat. <italic>International Journal of Chemical Studies, 6</italic>(2), 119–123</article-title>
          <year>2018</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R16">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Rajalingam</surname><given-names>G. V., Divya, M. P., Prabaharan, C</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Parthiban</surname><given-names>K. T</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Performance of vegetable crops under <italic>Ailanthus excelsa</italic> based agroforestry system. <italic>Indian Journal of Agroforestry, 18</italic>(1), 16–20</article-title>
          <year>2016</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="R17">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Terzopoulou</surname><given-names>P., Kamperidou, V</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Barboutis</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Utilization potential of tree-of-heaven species biomass—A review. <italic>Applied Sciences, 13</italic>, 9185</article-title>
          <year>2023</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

    </ref-list>

  </back>

</article>
