Digital and Participatory Extension Approaches in Vegetable Farming

Authors

  • Chandra Prakash Yadav Senior Project Associate IRRI Varansi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/asl.2026.2.01.03

Keywords:

traditions, shaped, vegetable, farmers, agronomic

Abstract

Two distinct extension traditions have shaped how vegetable farmers gain agronomic knowledge: participatory approaches that treat farmers as co-designers of innovation, and digital approaches that use mobile phones, apps, and increasingly artificial intelligence to deliver advice at scale. This review examines both traditions and the growing literature on where they intersect. Evidence from the World Vegetable Center and related participatory-design frameworks shows that the appropriate level of farmer participation depends on how ready an innovation is for local use. Evidence from digital extension programmes shows real reach and adoption gains, but also a risk that farmer-centred design intentions erode as digital platforms scale. Machine-learning tools for vegetable pest and disease diagnosis show high technical accuracy in controlled studies, but limited evidence yet on real-world farmer uptake. Digital Farmer Field Schools, which combine both traditions directly, show some of the strongest documented knowledge gains of any approach reviewed here, though evidence on their cost-effectiveness and durability over time remains thin. The review argues that combining participatory design with digital delivery, rather than treating them as substitutes, offers the most promising path for reaching vegetable farmers at both scale and relevance.

References

Pawera, L., Manickam, R., Wangungu, C., Bonnarith, U., Schreinemachers, P., & Ramasamy, S. (2024). Guidance on farmer participation in the design, testing and scaling of agricultural innovations. Agricultural Systems, 218, 104006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104006

Jones-Garcia, E., Legun, K., & Klerkx, L. (2026). From farmer-centred design to algorithmic participation: Navigating technical demands and normative discourses in digital extension. Agriculture and Human Values, 43(3), 127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-026-10928-z

Ortiz-Crespo, B., Steinke, J., Quirós, C. F., van de Gevel, J., Daudi, H., Mgimiloko, M. G., & van Etten, J. (2021). User-centred design of a digital advisory service: Enhancing public agricultural extension for sustainable intensification in Tanzania. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 19(5–6), 566–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2020.1720474

Vidyawati, Singh, S. P., & Jadoun, R. S. (2025). Participatory agricultural extension: A catalyst for sustainability and farmer empowerment. https://doi.org/10.33545/26180723.2025.v8.i4e.1790

Diaz, J., & Polanco, Y. (2025). Co-design for participatory action research in agriculture: A practical guide for extension (EDIS, AEC832). https://doi.org/10.32473/EDIS-WC494-2025

Xu, Z., Adeyemi, A. E., Catalan, E., Ma, S., Kogut, A., Guzman, C., & Kordrostami, M. (2023). A scoping review on technology applications in agricultural extension. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292877

Kansiime, M. K., Alawy, A., Allen, C., Subharwal, M., Jadhav, A., & Parr, M. (2019). Effectiveness of mobile agri-advisory service extension model: Evidence from Direct2Farm program in India. World Development Perspectives, 13, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2019.02.007

Image-based crop disease detection using machine learning. (2024). Plant Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.14006

Ha, J. G., Moon, H., Kwak, J. T., et al. (2017). Deep convolutional neural network for classifying Fusarium wilt of radish from unmanned aerial vehicles. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 11(4), 042621. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.11.042621

Advanced deep learning techniques for early disease prediction in cauliflower plants. (2023). Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45403-w

Begum, I. A., Alam, M. J., Shankar, B., Cooper, G., Rich, K., Mastura, T., Parikh, P., Ratna, N. N., & Kadiyala, S. (2025). Pesticide safety behavior among vegetable farmers in Bangladesh: Evaluating the role of market aggregation services. Heliyon, 11(1), e41013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41013

Kadam, K. R., Ahire, M. C., Dhadwad, M. B., & Dahatonde, A. S. (2026). Effect of soybean digital farmer field school on knowledge levels of respondents in Maharashtra. Indian Journal of Extension Education. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2026.62105

Witteveen, L., Lie, R., Goris, M., & Ingram, V. (2017). Design and development of a digital farmer field school: Experiences with a digital learning environment for cocoa production and certification in Sierra Leone. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8), 1673–1684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.013

Quizon, J., Feder, G., & Murgai, R. (2001). Fiscal sustainability of agricultural extension: The case of the farmer field school approach. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 8(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.5191/jiaee.2001.08102

Published

2026-09-16

How to Cite

Digital and Participatory Extension Approaches in Vegetable Farming. (2026). Agro-Science Letters, 2(1), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.48165/asl.2026.2.01.03