Constraints in Adoption of Biopesticides and Biological Control Agents: An Extension Analysis

Authors

  • Mahendra Gautam SMS (Plant Protection) Krishi Vigyan Kendra Ledaura, Azamgarh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/asl.2025.1.03.04

Keywords:

biopesticides, biological control agents, adoption constraints, agricultural extension, Garrett ranking, sustainable agriculture, technology transfer

Abstract

Biopesticides and biological control agents (BCAs) are central to reducing chemical-pesticide dependence and advancing sustainable crop protection, yet their field-level adoption remains persistently low relative to their demonstrated technical potential. This review synthesises extension-oriented empirical literature — drawing on studies from India (Andhra Pradesh, Bihar), the Philippines, Iran, Kenya and Tanzania — to develop a typology of constraints spanning knowledge and awareness, technical performance, economic, institutional/extension, regulatory and socio-psychological dimensions. Reported adoption rates ranged from 25 percent (Andhra Pradesh BCAs) to 60.7 percent (South Cotabato rice BCAs), with biopesticides accounting for only about 4.2 percent of India's pesticide market against a global average of roughly 10 percent. Across the reviewed studies, knowledge and awareness gaps were the most frequently cited barrier, followed closely by weak institutional/extension support and doubts about product efficacy. The review situates these findings within diffusion-of-innovation, theory-of-planned-behaviour and health-belief-model frameworks and argues that a strengthened, better-resourced extension system — rather than product innovation alone — is the pivotal lever for closing the adoption gap. Recommendations for extension policy and practice are outlined.

References

Abdollahzadeh, G., Damalas, C. A., & Sharifzadeh, M. S. (2017). Understanding adoption, non-adoption, and discontinuance of biological control in rice fields of northern Iran. Crop Protection, 93, 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.11.014

Chakraborty, N., Mitra, R., Pal, S., Ganguly, R., Acharya, K., Minkina, T., Sarkar, A., & Keswani, C. (2023). Biopesticide consumption in India: Insights into the current trends. Agriculture, 13(3), 557. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030557

Constantine, K., Makale, F., Mugambi, I., Rware, H., Chacha, D., Lowry, A., Rwomushana, I., & Williams, F. (2023). Smallholder farmers' knowledge, attitudes and practices towards biological control of papaya mealybug in Kenya. CABI Agriculture and Bioscience, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43170-023-00161-7

Kumar, S., Bhattacharya, D., & Banerjee, M. (2025). Bridging behavioral theories and government initiatives: Understanding the drivers of biopesticide adoption among farmers in India. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 40, e21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170525100070

Marrone, P. G. (2007). Barriers to adoption of biological control agents and biological pesticides. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources, 2(51). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626463.014

Mkenda, P. A., Ndakidemi, P. A., & Stevenson, P. C. (2020). Knowledge gaps hinder adoption of biological control. Biocontrol Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2019.1707169

Naranjo, S. E., Ellsworth, P. C., & Frisvold, G. B. (2015). Economic value of biological control in integrated pest management of managed plant systems. Annual Review of Entomology, 60(1), 621–645. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-021005

Pacol, R. D., & Marcelino, J. P. (2026). Determinants of biological control agent adoption among OPAG-assisted rice farmers in South Cotabato. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(5), 447–458. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20110942

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

van Lenteren, J. C. (2003). Commercial availability of biological control agents. In J. C. van Lenteren (Ed.), Quality control and production of biological control agents: Theory and testing procedures (pp. 167–179). CABI. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851996882.0167

van Lenteren, J. C., Bolckmans, K., Köhl, J., Ravensberg, W. J., & Urbaneja, A. (2018). Biological control using invertebrates and microorganisms: Plenty of new opportunities. BioControl, 63(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-017-9801-4

Varshney, R., Sivakumar, G., Subaharan, K., & Sushil, S. N. (2024). Advancing biocontrol: An Indian perspective on the production and status of biocontrol agents. Journal of Biological Control. https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2024/46321

Vennelasree, V., Divya, K., Uma, K., Prahadeeswaran, M., & Ashok Kumar, G. (2025). Determinants of the adoption of biological control agents in Andhra Pradesh. Plant Science Today, 12(sp1). https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.6106

Garrett, H. E., & Woodworth, R. S. (1969). Statistics in psychology and education. Vakils, Feffer & Simons.

Katole, R. T., et al. (2017). Constraints faced by the farmers in adoption of biofertilizers. ResearchGate preprint/conference paper.

Mongabay-India. (2019). What is preventing the widespread adoption of biopesticides in India? India Environmental Science and Conservation.

Published

2026-09-07

How to Cite

Constraints in Adoption of Biopesticides and Biological Control Agents: An Extension Analysis. (2026). Agro-Science Letters, 1(3), 32-37. https://doi.org/10.48165/asl.2025.1.03.04